istanbul evden eve nakliyat eşya depolama uluslararası nakliyat uluslararası evden eve nakliyat evden eve nakliyat istanbul ev taşıma istanbul nakliye firması ev eşyası depolama istanbul depo kiralama gebze nakliyat eşya depolama

 

 

We compute the total power P by multiplying the far-away redshifted energy density by the area A of the horizon. This may be a conceptual error in Hawking's original estimate of black hole evaporation time. The clock hovering at L distant from A is running much faster than our far away clock where we are. A is an infinite redshift surface, but including L makes it finite but large. Also it takes infinite far away clock time for objects to reach A etc.
 
Therefore, we can argue that the Wikipedia calculation is wrong. That is, for Hawking's surface gravity case, replace
 
P ~ A (energy density) ~ A^-1
 
by
 
P ~ g00(L)^1/2A (energy density)
~  [1 + z(L)]^-1A (energy density)
~ (L/A^1/2)^1/2A^-1
 
 
Therefore, even in Hawking's case, 
 
P ~ dM/dt ~ L^1/2/A^5/4
 
Therefore,
 
dM/dt ~ L^1/2/M^5/2
 
tHawking ~ M^7/2 /L^1/2  not M^3
 
remember there is no actual evidence for M^3.
 
Next our new case
 
Instead of
 
P' ~ AT'^4 ~ A/L^2A ~ L^-2 ~ mp^-2
 
dM'/dt ~ mp^-2
 
P' ~ [1 + z(L)]^-1AT'^4
~ (L^1/2/A^1/4)A/L^2A
~ 1/L^1/2A^1/4
 
dM'/dt ~ 1/L^1/2M^1/2
 
t' ~ L^1/2M^3/2

to be continued

Putting in some numbers
From Wiki
 
Stefan–Boltzmann–Schwarzschild–Hawking black hole radiation power law derivation:
For a solar mass black hole
Putting in the gravity time dilation factor L^1/2/A^1/4
 
L ~ 10^-35 meters
 
L^1/2 ~ (1/3) 10^-17
 
A^1/2 ~ 10^3 meters

A^1/4 ~ 3 x10
 
L^1/2/A^1/4 ~ 10^-17/3x3s10 ~ 10^-19
 
so
 
P ~ 10^-28 x 10^-19 ~ 10^-47 watts
 
Next for our gravity radiation
 
 
P' ~ [1 + z(L)]^-1AT'^4 ~ (L^1/2/A^1/4)A/L^2A ~ 1/L^1/2A^1/4

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stefan–Boltzmann_constant
 
P' ~ 6 x 10^-8T'^4
 
Our T' = (A^1/2/L)^1/2T ~  10^23(M/mp)^1/2(1/M) ~ 10^23/(mpM)^1/2  deg K
 
Therefore, energy density is
 
6 x 10^-8 x 10^92/mp^2M^2
 
Multiply by the area A and the gravity time dilation factor L^1/2/A^1/4
 
So that's effective area    L^1/2A^3/4
 
Total power is then
 
P' ~ 10^85 L^1/2A^3/4/mp^2M^2  Watts
 
for a solar mass scale black hole that's roughly
 
P' ~ 10^85 (1/3) 10^-17 (10^6^)3/4 10^10 x 10^-60  Watts
 
P' ~ 10^23 Watts - very roughly in gravity wave black body radiation ~ 
 
peak wavelength ~ 10^-16 meters ~ 10^24 Hz
 
to be continued - next order of biz evaporation lifetime

The 10^23 Watts is only the initial output - that increases as the black hole evaporates

Putting in some numbers
From Wiki
 
 
 
In our new theory this is I think
 
t'ev = c^2(mpM)^3/2 /3Kev 
 
(mpM)^3/2 = xM^3
 
x = (mpM)^3/2/M = (mp/M)^3/2
 
t'ev = (mp/M)^3/2 tev ~  (mp/M)^3/2 10^-16[M/kg]^3
 
For a ~ solar mass black hole 
 
(10^ -35)3/2 10^67 years ~ 10^-52 10^67 ~ 10^15 years

 
 
On Dec 5, 2013, at 7:55 PM, JACK SARFATTI <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.> wrote:


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawking_radiation
 
From the beginning:
 
First Hawking
 
L = Schwarzschild radial coordinate distance to horizon classical 2D surface g00 = 0.
 
Newton's surface gravity ~ A^-1/2
 
A = area-entropy of g00 = 0
 
What they do in Wikipedia above comes down to this
 
Redshifted Unruh temperature a long distant from the black hole is
 
THawking ~ A^-1/2
 
Stefan-Boltzmann law
 
energy density ~ THawking^4 ~ A^-2
 
Total redshifted power
 
P ~ A (energy density) ~ A^-1
 
A ~ M^2
 
P ~ dM/dt
 
tlifetime ~ M^3
 
OK now my new prediction following the same argument as above
 
The redshifted thickness gravity Unruh temperature is
 
T' ~ (LA^1/2)^-1/2
 
If we take
 
Lp ~ mp = Planck mass
 
T' ~ (mpM)^-1/2
 
P' ~ AT'^4 ~ A/L^2A ~ L^-2 ~ mp^-2
 
dM'/dt ~ mp^-2
 
t' ~ mp^2M << t ~ M^3