God was behind Big Bang, universe no accident: Pope http://bit.ly/hIWeSf

Yesterday at 11:09am via AutoTweet Connector · Like · Comment
Susan Waitt, Richard Jensen, Justin Smith and 2 others like this.

Adam Crowl But who was Behind God?
17 hours ago · Like

Jack Sarfatti Who do you think?
"Get behind me Satan."
I have not read the original link yet. If you look you will see Kim posted it.
16 hours ago · Like ·  1 person

Adam Crowl Of course. Should've known.
15 hours ago · Like

Kevin Dufoort Thought.
14 hours ago · Like

Adam Crowl The Fred Hoyle quote at the bottom of that post is stunningly outdated and inaccurate these days. Biomolecules - especially enzymes - aren't like the parts of a Jumbo at all. There's a lot more "wiggle room" in the amino acid sequences of enzymes - a huge range of working enzymes are produced in the natural world which do the same chemical task with very different sequences. Hoyle's problem isn't the problem it is portrayed to be.
13 hours ago · Like

Jack Sarfatti I put your quote in the news item.
12 hours ago · Like

Adam Crowl Kewl.
12 hours ago · Like

Jack Sarfatti The real evidence for God is the dark energy accelerating the expansion of our observable universe that comes from a future horizon that is a back-from-the-future hologram computer.
12 hours ago · Like ·  1 person

Adam Crowl Will we be resurrected by the Omega Point in your opinion?
11 hours ago · Like

Richard Jensen God is a holographic computer that exists in the future? True or False ?
4 hours ago · Like

Kevin Dufoort False
2 hours ago · Like

Jack Sarfatti True!
about an hour ago · Like ·  1 person

Richard Jensen I think I'm understanding your theories Jack :)
about an hour ago · Like

Jack Sarfatti Kevin is clueless. His opinion on this is is based on total ignorance of the physics involved. Yes, God is the holographic computer at the future horizon boundary of our observable universe. That's precisely my idea that will change religious beliefs.

about an hour ago · Like ·  1 person
Jack Sarfatti This idea is scientific - Popper falsifiable. Blind ignorant faith plays no role at all.
about an hour ago · Like

Jack Sarfatti Now, that said, I make no specific claims that God is personally interested in us - that is a separate problem. My view is like Einstein's more pantheistic.
about an hour ago · Like

Jack Sarfatti My view is consistent with Teilhard de Chardin's however. Also Pope Benedict would like it.
about an hour ago · Like

Jack Sarfatti I see Kevin is a smart a$$ kid of 18 who dares to challenge the Whiz of What Is! ;-)
about an hour ago · Like

Jack Sarfatti Read Seth Lloyd's papers. He is at MIT. He argues that gravity horizons are computers.
about an hour ago · Like

Richard Jensen hehehe Jack, we were all smart a$$ kids of 18 once.
about an hour ago · Like

Jack Sarfatti Also read P.K. Dick's VALIS, Olaf Stapledon's Star Maker, Fred Hoyle's Black Cloud, also Stan Lem's Solaris, and look up I.J. Good's "GOD(D)" Deux Ex Machina has a new meaning and Henri Bergson's "elan vital" is post-quantum signal nonlocality allowing not only back from the future destiny matrix communication but also creation!
about an hour ago · Like ·  1 person

Jack Sarfatti Indeed, but the survival of the planet depends on these ideas being understood in time and the revolution is starting here. This meme must go viral now on Facebook as a start or all is lost in this timeline of the multiverse.
about an hour ago · Like ·  1 person

Jack Sarfatti See Frank Tipler Physics of Immortality on resurrection. Since we are all back-from-the-future hologram images of our future event horizon Mind of God computer - seems like Jesus Christ may have known a thing or two about that. ;-)
a few seconds ago · Like