More from Nick Herbert on presponse

Obviously this point needs close attention from the experts. I am not one of them. ;-)

On Oct 20, 2012, at 5:20 PM, nick herbert <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.> wrote:

Because the hypothetical expectation bias is an increasing function of n, not only will excitation peak on the Emotional pictures N, this hypothesis also predicts a lesser peak on the Neutral picture M that just precedes each emotional picture--the picture I call N-1. In some cases N-1 will be an Emotional picture also. In this case you choose N-2. The expectation bias hypothesis predicts that If a data set shows a strong Radin Effect (presponse on the Ns greater than presponse on the Ms),
then the same data set will show a (weaker) Radin Effect on the N-1s.

I am surprised that there was not a big flurry of interest in the Robin hypothesis because it is a valid challenge to the presentiment experiment that has testable consequences.


On Oct 19, 2012, at 10:05 PM, Dean Radin wrote:

Can you describe what the N-1 effect is? I can imagine what that means, but I'd rather know for sure.

best wishes,
Dean


On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:15 PM, nick herbert <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.> wrote:
Thanks for the update. To your knowledge has the N-1 effect predicted by expectation bias
ever been tested?