Home
Login
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Jack Sarfatti's Blog
Blog (Full Text Display)
News
Science
Weird Desk
News Archive
Science News (2010)
Weird Desk (2010)
Library
Research
Fringes
Physics
UFO Sightings Map
Cosmology
Nanotechnology
Advanced Propulsion
Metamaterials
Quantum Computing
Text Size
You are here:
Home
Jack Sarfatti's Blog
Zielinski's report on time travel to the past in modern physics
Zielinski's report on time travel to the past in modern physics
ack Sarfatti
2 minutes ago
near
San Francisco
Paul Zielinski
report on time travel to the past
Like
·
·
Share
Jack Sarfatti
CTC = Closed Timelike Curves allows in principle time travel to the past as in some UFO evidence.
On Jun 7, 2013, at 3:46 PM, Paul Zelinsky <
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
> wrote:
Jack,
Here is the review of CTCs I did for Dan. Let me know what you think.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: CTCs.....
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 12:13:50 -0700
From: Paul Zielinski <
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
>
Reply-To:
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
To: Dan <
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
>
CC: David Gladstone <
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
>
Hi Dan,
OK I've done my technical review of CTCs and here is a summary of my take on this. I won't copy Jack on this until we've had a chance to talk about it.
Here goes:
1. CTCs are a feature of numerous spacetimes with metrics that are mathematically well behaved and are fully compatible
with the principles of classical GR.
agreed
Well known examples include
=> The Godel universe: Rev. Mod. Phys. 21 (3): 447–450 (1949)
=> Van Stockum spacetimes: van Stockum, WJ, Proc. R. Soc. Edin. 57, 135–154 (1937)
=> Tipler cylinders: Tipler FJ, Phys. Rev. D9, 2203–2206 (1974)
=> Longitudinally spinning cosmic strings: Visser M. (1995).
=> Kerr and Kerr–Newman geometries: Hawking and Ellis, The Large Scale Structure of Spacetime (1973)
=> Gott’s time machines: Gott JR, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1126-1129 (1991)
=> Wheeler wormholes (spacetime foam): Wheeler JA, Geometrodynamics (1962)
=> Morris–Thorne traversable wormholes: Morris MS and Thorne KS, Am. J. Phys. 56, 395–412 (1988).
=> Alcubierre “warp drive” spacetimes: Alcubierre M, Class. Quant. Grav. 11, L73–L77 (1994)
right
2. Paradoxes allegedly associated with such CTCs, namely the grandfather paradox and the self-causality paradox, were
initially thought to exclude CTCs and GR time machines as unphysical, leading to Hawking's "chronology protection conjecture"
(CPC) which barred all GR metrics featuring CTCs (Hawking SW, Phys. Rev. D46, 603-611 (1992)). The divergences predicted
to occur at chronology horizons in such universes in the context of classical GR (Hawking SW, Ellis GFR: The large scale
structure of space-time (1973)) which would prevent CTCs from forming were later found not to occur in the context of quantum
gravity (e.g., Kim SW, Thorne KS, Phys. Rev. D43, 3929 (1991)).
right
3. In the 1970s and 1980s Igor Novikov discussed the possibility of CTCs in the context of classical GR, and then later
co-authored a paper on the subject (Friedman, Novikov, et al, Phys. Rev. D, 42 (6). pp. 1915-1930 (1990)) in which
the following self-consistency conditions for physical CTCs was proposed:
"The only solutions to the laws of physics that can occur locally in the real Universe are those which are globally self-
consistent."
The authors of the 1990 Phys. Rev. paper remarked,
"This principle allows one to build a local solution to the equations of physics only if that local solution can be extended to a
part of a (not necessarily unique) global solution, which is well defined throughout the non-singular regions of the spacetime."
right
3. Further research, reviewed for example by Kip Thorne et al. (Morris MS, Thorne KS, and Yurtsever U, Phys. Rev.
Lett. 61(13) 1446-1449 (1988)) and later by Matt Visser (Visser M, “The Quantum Physics of Chronology Protection” (2003)) led to
the conclusion that Hawking's CPC is not an essential feature of classical GR, and that definitive answers to the question of the
physical admissibility of CTCs would have to await a deeper and more complete understanding of quantum gravity.
right
4. In a seminal 1991 paper David Deutsch (Phys. Rev. D 44(10): 3197–3217 (1991)) explored the implications of CTCs in the
context of quantum computational theory, and proposed a self-consistency condition on the density matrices of CTC qubits that he
claims resolves the grandfather paradox (although not everyone accepts Deutsch's arguments). Deutsch’s self-consistency condition
essentially requires that the density matrix of the CTC system after an interaction be equal to the density matrix before the interaction.
Deutsch tacitly assumes a spacetime in which CTCs exists and applies QM to the CTC forward-in-time and backwards-in-time
information transfers and concludes that quantum phenomena observable near such trajectories at the macroscopic level ensure
that the grandfather paradox is resolved and the proposed consistency condition is satisfied.
right
about a minute ago
·
Like
Jack Sarfatti
In his 1991 paper Deutsch said:
"I have shown that the traditional 'paradoxes' of chronology violation, whatever position one takes on their seriousness, do not
occur at all under quantum mechanics."
"The physics near closed timelike lines is dominated by macroscopic quantum effects and has many novel features. The
correspondence principle is violated. Pure states evolve into mixed states. The dynamical evolution is not unitary nor is it even
the restriction to a subsystem of unitary evolution in a larger system."
"All these effects are stable and do not require the maintenance of quantum coherence. They therefore apply to macroscopic
systems."
5. In 2009 G. Svetlichny proposed ("Effective Time Travel", arXiv:0902.4898v1 [quant-ph] (2009)) that a quantum teleportation
protocol can be used to simulate a physical CTC, arguing that the probabilistic nature of the QM predictions resolves all paradoxes
associated with CTCs. Such a time loop is described as the "QM analog of a CTC". However, since this is a QM teleportation
model, in such models only the qubit content of the state of the teleported entangled system is sent back into the past, as opposed
to the entangled system itself:
"What we have... is effective time travel. After the fact of the measurement M taken place there is no empirical way to falsify
the statement that the qubit at A did travel back in time to B, but this is not true time travel. By true time travel I mean one whose
denial can be falsified by empirical evidence. One can however ask if any of the supposed effects and benefits of supposed
true time travel do somehow exist in this case. The surprising answer is yes, but obviously those that cannot lead to time travel
paradoxes. In these cases, time travel is a reading of the situation which can otherwise be analyzed in usual quantum
mechanical terms."
Essentially the quantum circuit with the back-in-time channel is treated as a metaphor for a physical CTC that allows certain
conclusions to be drawn about their behavior and to show how time travel paradoxes can be resolved:
"Of course the above is a narrative and should not be simply accepted as a description of a physical process. All philosophically
or scientifically motivated discussions of time travel have been likewise narratives as the time travel process, or time machine, is
necessarily merely hypothesized to have certain properties not being able to refer to physically realizable situations. This type of
narrative is at best a meta-theoretic discussion, for instance exploring the question as to whether the existence of supposed true
time travel is consistent with present physical laws or do these need to be modified to admit it. In our narratives neither the claim
nor the denial of time travel can be empirically falsified. This non-falsifiability makes both the claim and the denial non-scientific
assertions. On the other hand our narrative takes place in the context of a physically realizable process and so cannot lead to
any contradiction. We thus have a source of time travel narratives in which all paradoxes are resolved and this has interesting
philosophical and scientific implications." - p5
a few seconds ago
·
Like
Jack Sarfatti
6. In 2010 Seth Lloyd et al., following the same basic approach as Svetlichny, published two papers in which they proposed the
use of post- selected quantum teleportation protocol to simulate a physical CTC, with a self-consistency condition
different from Deutsch's that has different physical consequences ("P-CTC"). Lloyd et al.'s P-CTC protocol operates by combining
a chronology-respecting qubit with a chronology-violating qubit, and allowing them to interact under unitary evolution. After such
interaction, the chronology-respecting qubit goes forward in time, while the chronology-violating qubit goes back in time. It is
assumed that the unitary evolution of the 2-qubit system is mathematically equivalent to combining the state of the chronology-
respecting qubit with a maximally entangled Bell state. There follows a unitary interaction between the chronology-respecting
qubit and half of the entangled Bell state. The final steps in the protocol are the projection of the two substates onto the entangled
Bell state, then non-linear renormalization of the state, followed by tracing out of the last two systems.
As mentioned above, Deutsch’s self-consistency condition requires that after unitary interaction the density matrices of the CTC
system before and after the interaction are equal. This was designed to reproduce the predictions of ordinary QM without CTCs.
Post-selected CTCs, on the other hand, are effectively equivalent in this approach to “post-selection with certainty”, which the
authors argue neatly excludes all unitary evolutions resulting in paradoxes.
7. The thermodynamic implications of CTCs, and thermodynamic arguments for and against chronology protection, are explored
by Michael Devin (Devin M: Thermodynamics of Time Machines (2013)). No conclusive argument against CTCs is evident in this
Devins' paper.
Links:
Hawking SW, Phys. Rev. D 46, 603-611 (1992)
http://prd.aps.org/abstract/PRD/v46/i2/p603_1
Thorne K: Closed Timelike Curves (1993)
http://www.its.caltech.edu/~kip/scripts/ClosedTimelikeCurves-II121.pdf
Visser M: The quantum physics of chronology protection (2002)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/0204022v2.pdf
Roberts B: Closed Timelike Curves (2008)
http://www-bcf.usc.edu/~bwrobert/research/RobertsB_CTCreview.pdf
Morris et al: Wormholes. Time Machines, and the Weak Energy Condition (1988)
http://authors.library.caltech.edu/9262/1/MORprl88.pdf
Deutsch D: Quantum mechanics near closed timelike lines, Phys Rev D 44(10), 3197–3217 (1991)
http://www.hpc.unm.edu/~alsing/Courses/RQI/articles/deutsch_prd44_p3197_Y91_qm_closed_timelike_curves.pdf
Svetlichny G: Effective Quantum Time Travel (2009)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/0902.4898v1.pdf
Lloyd S et al: Closed timelike curves via post-selection: theory and experimental demonstration (2010)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.2219v1.pdf
Lloyd S et al: The quantum mechanics of time travel through post-selected teleportation (2010)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1007.2615v2.pdf
___________________________________________________________________________________
So from the standpoint of physics, what is the bottom line for CTCs? From the above it appears that CTCs are not only a feature
of numerous mathematically well-behaved spacetimes that are compatible with classical GR, but the feared time-travel paradoxes
associated with CTCs in the context of classical or semi-classical GR can be resolved by the use of quantum computational protocols
to model the forward-in-time and back-in-time qubit information transfers that can be expected to occur in such loops, even if the QM
protocols are really only metaphors (models) in relation to actual physical CTCs that are associated with certain solutions of the GR
field equations. Thus far from enforcing Hawking's CPC, these protocols appear to make it irrelevant. Which I suppose is good news
for you.
What is not so good news for you is that both the Deutsch and Seth Lloyd et al. approaches piggyback on classical CTCs. They
both *presuppose* the existence of spacetime CTCs, and investigate the time travel paradoxes associated with then using quantum
computational techniques. The only difference between Deutsch and Lloyd et al. consists in application of different quantum
informational self-consistency principles with different physical consequences, which in the case of Lloyd et al. is based on a post-
selected quantum teleportation model. This means that CTCs are still a feature of certain 4D spacetimes, and are thus not buried in
any quantum "implicate order". Both Deutsch and Lloyd et al. use QM to see how the information transfer properties of classically
defined CTCs play out in the context of QM.
Thus the relationship between CTCs and the holographic universe is much the same as any other world line -- CTCs belong to the
"explicate" order. So if only the explicate order is to be regarded as fundamental, such CTCs cannot be regarded as fundamental.
The belong to the explicate physical reality that may or may not be encoded on a 3D hypersurface according to the holographic
model.
correct
Now as to the relevance of CTCs to your BPWH, there is a tricky question of interpretation. The standard interpretation of physical
CTCs wherein a particle moving along a CTC can return to an earlier time to "bump into itself" seems questionable, since there is
nothing in the principles of GR to suggest that the mere existence of such a closed timelike trajectory must convert one object into
two. It seems arguable to me that an alternative interpretation in which the returning object is one and the same as the starting object,
and experiences endless recurrences of its life history along the CTC, is a more natural one. But then one has to deal with the
internal properties of the object and irreversible thermodynamic processes and how they relate to the proper time intervals around
the CTC.
I disagree here. There will be two copies and older and a younger. This is what Deutsch says and I agree with Deutsch.
You said that you would like to insert a "spark gap" into such a CTC, that would somehow be analogous to a Wheelerian self-excited
loop. The only solution I have been able to think of so far is a wormhole with its mouth positioned along the CTC. This might create a
"gap" without actually interrupting the CTC. But I'd like to hear more from you about exactly you are looking for before pursuing this
idea.
As I see it the next step in this project is to investigate the meaning of black hole thermodynamics (as per Beckenstein) and the
holographic model for the universe, and there implications for your BPWH metaphysics.
OK
Phys. Rev. D 46, 603 (1992): Chronology protection conjecture
link.aps.org
S. W. HawkingDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Silver Street, Cambridge CB3 9EW, United Kingdom
a few seconds ago
·
Like
·
Remove Preview
Category:
MyBlog
Written by Jack Sarfatti
Published on Friday, 07 June 2013 13:12
Categories ...
't Hooft
100 Year Star Ship
Abner Shimony
accelerometers
action-reaction principle
Aephraim Sternberg
Alan Turing
Albert Einstein
Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer
American Institute of Physics
Andrija Puharich
Anthony Valentin
Anton Zeilinger
Antony Valentini
anyon
Apple Computer
Artificial Intelligence
Asher Peres
Back From The Future
Basil Hiley
Bell's theorem
Ben Affleck
Ben Libet
Bernard Carr
Bill Clinton
black body radiation
Black Hole
black hole firewall
black hole information paradox
black holes
Bohm
brain waves
Brian Josephson
Broadwell
Cambridge University
Carnot Heat Engine
Central Intelligence Agency
CIA
Clive Prince
closed time like curves
coherent quantum state
Consciousness
conservation laws
Cosmic Landscape
Cosmological Constant
cosmology
CTC
cyber-bullying
Dancing Wu Li Masters
Dark Energy
Dark Matter
DARPA
Daryl Bem
David Bohm
David Deutsch
David Gross
David Kaiser
David Neyland
David Tong
de Sitter horizon
Dean Radin
Deepak Chopra
delayed choice
Demetrios A. Kalamidas
Demetrios Kalamidas
Dennis Sciama
Destiny Matrix
Dick Bierman
Doppler radars
E8 group
Einstein's curved spacetime gravity
Einstein's happiest thought
electromagnetism
Eli Cartan
EMP Nuclear Attack
entanglement signals
ER=EPR
Eric Davis
Ernst Mach
ET
Eternal Chaotic Inflation
evaporating black holes
Facebook
Faster-Than-Light Signals?
fictitious force
firewall paradox
flying saucers
FQXi
Frank Tipler
Frank Wilczek
Fred Alan Wolf
Free Will
G.'t Hooft
Garrett Moddel
Gary Zukav
gauge theory
general relativity
Geometrodynamics
Gerard 't Hooft
Giancarlo Ghirardi
God
Goldstone theorem
gravimagnetism
gravity
Gravity - the movie
gravity gradiometers
gravity tetrads
Gravity Waves
Gregory Corso
gyroscopes
hacking quantum cryptographs
Hagen Kleinert
Hal Puthoff
Hawking radiation
Heisenberg
Henry Stapp
Herbert Gold
Higgs boson
Higgs field
hologram universe
Horizon
How the Hippies Saved Physics
I.J. Good
ICBMs
Igor Novikov
inertial forces
inertial navigation
Inquisition
Internet
Iphone
Iran
Isaac Newton
Israel
Jack Sarfatti
Jacques Vallee
James F. Woodward
James Woodward
JASON Dept of Defense
Jeffrey Bub
Jesse Ventura
Jim Woodward
John Archibald Wheeler
John Baez
John Cramer
John S. Bell
Ken Peacock
Kip Thorne
Kornel Lanczos
La Boheme
Laputa
Large Hadron Collider
Lenny Susskind
Leonard Susskind
Levi-Civita connection
LHC CERN
libel
Louis de Broglie
Lubos Motl
LUX
Lynn Picknett
M-Theory
Mach's Principle
Mae Jemison
Making Starships and Star Gates
Martin Rees
Mathematical Mind
MATRIX
Matter-AntiMatter Asymmetry
Max Tegmark
Menas Kafatos
Michael Persinger
Michael Towler
microtubules
Milky way
MIT
MOSSAD
multiverse
NASA
Nick Bostrum
Nick Herbert
Nobel Prize
nonlocality
Obama
organized-stalking
Origin of Inertia
P. A. M. Dirac
P.K.Dick
P.W. Anderson
Paranormal
parapsychology
Paul Werbos
Perimeter Institute
Petraeus
Physical Review Letters
Physics Today
Post-Quantum Physics
pre-Big Bang
precognition
presponse
PSI WARS
Psychic Repression
qualia
Quantum Chromodynamics
quantum computers
quantum entanglement
quantum field theory
quantum gravity
Quantum Information Theory
Quantum Theory
RAF Spitfires
Ray Chiao
Red Chinese
Remote Viewing
retrocausality
Reviews of Modern Physics
Richard Feynman
Richard P. Feynman
Rindler effect
Robert Anton Wilson
Robert Bigelow
Roger Penrose
rotating black holes
Roy Glauber
Rupert Sheldrake
Russell Targ
Ruth Elinor Kastner
S-Matrix
Sagnac effect
Sam Ting
Sanford Underground Research Facility
Sarfatti Lectures in Physics
Scientific American
Second Law of Thermodynamics
Seth Lloyd
signal nonlocality
Skinwalker Ranch
social networks
space drive
space-time crystal
SPECTRA - UFO COMPUTER
spontaneous broken symmetry
SRI Remote Viewing Experiments
Stanford Physics
Stanford Research Institute
Star Gate
Star Ship
Star Trek Q
Stargate
Starship
Stephen Hawking
Steven Weinberg
stretched membrane
string theory
strong force gluons
Stuart Hameroff
superconducting meta-material
supersymmetry
symmetries
telepathy
Templeton
The Guardian
Thought Police
time crystal
time travel
topological computers
Topological Computing
torsion
UFO
Unitarity
unitary S-Matrix false?
Unruh effect
Uri Geller
VALIS
virtual particle
Virtual Reality
Warp Drive
weak force
Wheeler-Feynman
WIMP
WMAP
WMD
world crystal lattice
wormhole
Yakir Aharonov
Yuri Milner
Archive ...
November 2015
(1)
January 2015
(1)
December 2014
(1)
August 2014
(2)
July 2014
(2)
June 2014
(2)
May 2014
(1)
April 2014
(6)
March 2014
(6)
February 2014
(1)
January 2014
(3)
December 2013
(5)
November 2013
(8)
October 2013
(13)
September 2013
(8)
August 2013
(12)
July 2013
(3)
June 2013
(32)
May 2013
(3)
April 2013
(6)
March 2013
(6)
February 2013
(15)
January 2013
(5)
December 2012
(15)
November 2012
(15)
October 2012
(18)
September 2012
(12)
August 2012
(15)
July 2012
(30)
June 2012
(13)
May 2012
(18)
April 2012
(12)
March 2012
(28)
February 2012
(15)
January 2012
(25)
December 2011
(29)
November 2011
(30)
October 2011
(39)
September 2011
(22)
August 2011
(41)
July 2011
(42)
June 2011
(24)
May 2011
(13)
April 2011
(13)
March 2011
(15)
February 2011
(17)
January 2011
(31)
December 2010
(19)
November 2010
(22)
October 2010
(31)
September 2010
(41)
August 2010
(30)
July 2010
(27)
June 2010
(12)
May 2010
(20)
April 2010
(19)
March 2010
(27)
February 2010
(34)
Scroll To Top