Home
Login
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Jack Sarfatti's Blog
Blog (Full Text Display)
News
Science
Weird Desk
News Archive
Science News (2010)
Weird Desk (2010)
Library
Research
Fringes
Physics
UFO Sightings Map
Cosmology
Nanotechnology
Advanced Propulsion
Metamaterials
Quantum Computing
Text Size
You are here:
Home
Jack Sarfatti's Blog
Simple formula for the conjectured Mach thrust effect for Space Ships
Simple formula for the conjectured Mach thrust effect for Space Ships
Jack Sarfatti
Timeline
Now
Status
Photo
Place
Life Event
Status
Photo
Place
Life Event
What's on your mind?
Jack Sarfatti
35 minutes ago
near
San Francisco
The Mach Propulsion Star Ship glows hot.
Like
·
·
Share
Jack Sarfatti
On Jul 5, 2013, at 2:30 PM, Robert Addinall <
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
> wrote:
Jack,
Obviously you take a different view to Jim on what is a fictitious force and therefore how stargates would work, which is well-recorded in Jim’s e-mail list correspondence. You seemed to have comprised with his views slightly when you developed your analysis of Rindler redshifted back from the future radiation as explaining dark energy last month. I find your interpretation interesting and plausible as well, so keep writing…
Jack says: Not really. Jim never bothered to put numbers into his theory here. Yes there is a cosmological blue shift, but it's tiny at z = 1/2 compared to the enormous gravity redshift z = (A^1/2/Lp)^1/2 ~ (10^28/10^-33)^1/2 ~ 10^30
Beowolf says: A few comments:
1. Is it necessary to assume that flying saucers get here through stargates,
Jack says: Yes. See Enrico Rodrigo's book to see why.
or is it just as well to assume a broader range of mechanisms which use negative energy densities to alter the curvature of space-time (ie. Alcubierre metrics as well as Kip Thorne’s wormholes)?
Jack says: Stargates are Kip Thorne's wormholes. Also, as I have said and as Rodrigo says the physics of wormholes and warp drive are the same - if you can do one, you can do the other.
Beowolf says: 2. I did watch the one Susskind video you linked to (the talk he gave in Toronto), discussing analogies between black hole and observable universe event horizons. I will watch his other lectures this summer if I have time, but finding time is always difficult. There is too much to do in life and not enough time. Life extension technology would be nice.
3. Your grammar is unclear to me in the phrase: “measuring all the observables possessed by the “test particles”;” you obviously mean something like all the observable motion(s) or all the observable properties of the test particles but it is not precise.
Jack says: It's perfectly clear to me.
32 minutes ago
·
Like
Jack Sarfatti
In response to Beowolf I wrote:
The view I take is the standard mainstream view in every top textbook on the subject - the way it's taught at Cal Tech and every other top university.
The Wikipedia article on fictitious forces is good on this.
You must understand that Jim's view that the fictitious inertial pseudo-forces, i.e. centrifugal, Euler, Coriolis as well as Newton's F = - GMmr/r^3 are caused by a Mach influence from distant matter is considered "fringe" at the very best and totally cracked at the very worst.
In Einstein's theory all of these fictitious inertial pseudo-forces are part of the Levi-Civita connection in the covariant derivative D/ds with respect to proper time. Newton's 2nd law in GR is
Real EM-weak-strong 4-force on test particle =
Special Relativity proper time derivative of 4-momentum of test particle - Levi-Civita Fictitious Force Term
Einstein's Equivalence Principle EEP is that the Levi-Civita Fictitious Force Term = 0 in any Local Inertial Frame (LIF)'s CENTER OF MASS (COM)
All of this is LOCAL PHYSICS true even in the total absence of gravity and even of the distant matter. You can imagine a universe with only a test particle and a detector - nothing else and these equations would work.
Now, Jim keeps shooting himself in the foot with all this Mickey Mouse Sciama toy model that even Sciama rejected as simpler than is possible. It was only an off the cuff back of the envelope half-baked notion of Sciama's.
What I can accept, is the CONJECTURE:
Real EM-weak-strong 4-force on test particle =
{Special Relativity proper time derivative of {(Response from Distant Matter) (4-momentum of test particle) }
- (Levi-Civita Fictitious Force Term) (Response from Distant Matter)}
In which the coefficient (Response from Distant Matter) has both advanced Wheeler-Feynman back from the future Destiny pieces and retarded past to present History pieces in the sense of Yakir Aharonov's "weak measurements" with pre and post-selection. Fred Hoyle already had this idea in his book "The Intelligent Universe" (~ 1984 ).
In formal language suppressing indices
P' = (Mach)P
F = D{(Mach)P}/ds = (Mach)DP/ds + Pd(Mach)/ds
Pseudo-forces are completely irrelevant to any Mach propulsion effect.
Suppose we are in a LIF and F = 0 then
(Mach)dP/ds + Pd(Mach)/ds = 0
Pd(Mach)/ds is the CONJECTURED MET effect clearly & properly expressed by me perhaps for the first time?
In this Machian picture added AD-HOC to Einstein's GR if no distant matter, then
P' = 0 since (Mach) = 0
Shed all the excess baggage of fictitious forces that are a distraction of absolutely no relevance.
29 minutes ago
·
Edited
·
Like
Jack Sarfatti
From: JACK SARFATTI [mailto:
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
]
Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2013 7:03 PM
To: Exotic Physics
Subject: Star Gate Book Notes 1
Stargate
Making Star Trek Real
Jack Sarfatti
Preface
I adopt as a working hypothesis that the flying saucers are real and that they get here through stargates. The task is then to see what modern physics has to say about such a scenario even if it’s not true. Whether or not it’s true is beside the point. I will also write about quantum theory and its relation to computing, consciousness, cosmology, the hologram universe and ending in a scenario for Stephen Hawking’s “Mind of God.” That Hawking thinks God is not necessary is again is beside the point. A good background reference here is Enrico Rodrigo’s “The Physics of Stargates: Parallel Universes, Time Travel and the Enigma of Wormhole Physics.” If you have the patience, Leonard Susskind’s Stanford University lectures in physics online videos are also worth the effort for the serious student.
Chapter 1 Einstein’s Theory of Relativity in a Nutshell
Contrary to popular misconceptions, although the local laws of classical physics have the same “tensor” and/or “spinor” form for all motions of detectors measuring all the observable possessed by the “test particles”, there are privileged dynamical motions of the test particles in Einstein’s two theories of relativity special 1905 and general 1916. This was in Einstein’s words “My happiest thought.” These privileged motions are called “geodesic” motions or “world lines.” Test particles are distinguished from “source particles.” It is an approximation that test particles do not significantly modify the fields acting on them. They are, strictly speaking, a useful contradiction of the metaphysical principle of no action of Alice on Bob without a direct “back-reaction” of Bob on Alice. Massless point test particles in what physicists call the “classical limit” move on “null” or “lightlike” geodesics. Test particles with mass m move on timelike geodesics that are inside the “light cone” formed by all the light rays that might be emitted from that test particle if it were electrically charged and if it were really accelerating. The latter is a “counter-factual” statement. Look that up on Google. The key point is that Alice is weightless when traveling on a timelike geodesic inside her two local light cones past and future. There are no real forces F acting on Alice. On the contrary, Bob who is measuring Alice with a detector (aka “measuring apparatus”) need not be on another timelike geodesic. He can be off-geodesic because real forces can be acting on him causing him to feel weight. The real forces acting on Bob appear as “fictitious” “inertial pseudo-forces” acting on Alice from Bob’s frame of reference. The only real forces in nature that we know about in 2013 are the electro-magnetic, the weak and the strong. Gravity is not a real force in Einstein’s theory. Gravity is one of the fictitious forces described above. Real forces on test particles, unlike all fictitious forces on them, are not universal. Fictitious inertial forces that appear to, but are not really acting on the observed test particles all depend on the mass mass m of the test particle. Consequently, if Alice and Eve are each on separate timelike geodesics very close to each other and if Bob who is not on a timelike geodesic of his own due to real forces acting on him, then Alice and Eve will have the same kinematical acceleration relative to Bob and they will both feel weightless though Bob feels weight – also called “g-force.” This causes a lot of confusion, especially to aerospace missile engineers and high-energy particle physicists, because Newton did consider gravity to be a real force, but Einstein did not. Gravity is not a force. Gravity is the curvature tensor of four-dimensional space-time. What Newton thought of as a real gravity force, is demoted to a fictitious inertial pseudo-force in Einstein’s theory. In the language of the late John Archibald Wheeler, gravity is a “force without Force”. The best local frame invariant way to think about gravity in an objective local frame-independent way is the pattern of both light like and timelike geodesics whose source is the “stress-energy density tensor field” Tuv of matter. By matter we mean spin 1/2 leptons, quarks, and the spin 1 electromagnetic-weak-strong gauge bosons as well as the spin 0 Higgs vacuum superconductor field that formed only when our observable piece of the multiverse called the “causal diamond” popped out of the false vacuum about 13.7 billion years ago.
Sent from iCloud
Category:
MyBlog
Written by Jack Sarfatti
Published on Friday, 05 July 2013 16:10
Categories ...
't Hooft
100 Year Star Ship
Abner Shimony
accelerometers
action-reaction principle
Aephraim Sternberg
Alan Turing
Albert Einstein
Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer
American Institute of Physics
Andrija Puharich
Anthony Valentin
Anton Zeilinger
Antony Valentini
anyon
Apple Computer
Artificial Intelligence
Asher Peres
Back From The Future
Basil Hiley
Bell's theorem
Ben Affleck
Ben Libet
Bernard Carr
Bill Clinton
black body radiation
Black Hole
black hole firewall
black hole information paradox
black holes
Bohm
brain waves
Brian Josephson
Broadwell
Cambridge University
Carnot Heat Engine
Central Intelligence Agency
CIA
Clive Prince
closed time like curves
coherent quantum state
Consciousness
conservation laws
Cosmic Landscape
Cosmological Constant
cosmology
CTC
cyber-bullying
Dancing Wu Li Masters
Dark Energy
Dark Matter
DARPA
Daryl Bem
David Bohm
David Deutsch
David Gross
David Kaiser
David Neyland
David Tong
de Sitter horizon
Dean Radin
Deepak Chopra
delayed choice
Demetrios A. Kalamidas
Demetrios Kalamidas
Dennis Sciama
Destiny Matrix
Dick Bierman
Doppler radars
E8 group
Einstein's curved spacetime gravity
Einstein's happiest thought
electromagnetism
Eli Cartan
EMP Nuclear Attack
entanglement signals
ER=EPR
Eric Davis
Ernst Mach
ET
Eternal Chaotic Inflation
evaporating black holes
Facebook
Faster-Than-Light Signals?
fictitious force
firewall paradox
flying saucers
FQXi
Frank Tipler
Frank Wilczek
Fred Alan Wolf
Free Will
G.'t Hooft
Garrett Moddel
Gary Zukav
gauge theory
general relativity
Geometrodynamics
Gerard 't Hooft
Giancarlo Ghirardi
God
Goldstone theorem
gravimagnetism
gravity
Gravity - the movie
gravity gradiometers
gravity tetrads
Gravity Waves
Gregory Corso
gyroscopes
hacking quantum cryptographs
Hagen Kleinert
Hal Puthoff
Hawking radiation
Heisenberg
Henry Stapp
Herbert Gold
Higgs boson
Higgs field
hologram universe
Horizon
How the Hippies Saved Physics
I.J. Good
ICBMs
Igor Novikov
inertial forces
inertial navigation
Inquisition
Internet
Iphone
Iran
Isaac Newton
Israel
Jack Sarfatti
Jacques Vallee
James F. Woodward
James Woodward
JASON Dept of Defense
Jeffrey Bub
Jesse Ventura
Jim Woodward
John Archibald Wheeler
John Baez
John Cramer
John S. Bell
Ken Peacock
Kip Thorne
Kornel Lanczos
La Boheme
Laputa
Large Hadron Collider
Lenny Susskind
Leonard Susskind
Levi-Civita connection
LHC CERN
libel
Louis de Broglie
Lubos Motl
LUX
Lynn Picknett
M-Theory
Mach's Principle
Mae Jemison
Making Starships and Star Gates
Martin Rees
Mathematical Mind
MATRIX
Matter-AntiMatter Asymmetry
Max Tegmark
Menas Kafatos
Michael Persinger
Michael Towler
microtubules
Milky way
MIT
MOSSAD
multiverse
NASA
Nick Bostrum
Nick Herbert
Nobel Prize
nonlocality
Obama
organized-stalking
Origin of Inertia
P. A. M. Dirac
P.K.Dick
P.W. Anderson
Paranormal
parapsychology
Paul Werbos
Perimeter Institute
Petraeus
Physical Review Letters
Physics Today
Post-Quantum Physics
pre-Big Bang
precognition
presponse
PSI WARS
Psychic Repression
qualia
Quantum Chromodynamics
quantum computers
quantum entanglement
quantum field theory
quantum gravity
Quantum Information Theory
Quantum Theory
RAF Spitfires
Ray Chiao
Red Chinese
Remote Viewing
retrocausality
Reviews of Modern Physics
Richard Feynman
Richard P. Feynman
Rindler effect
Robert Anton Wilson
Robert Bigelow
Roger Penrose
rotating black holes
Roy Glauber
Rupert Sheldrake
Russell Targ
Ruth Elinor Kastner
S-Matrix
Sagnac effect
Sam Ting
Sanford Underground Research Facility
Sarfatti Lectures in Physics
Scientific American
Second Law of Thermodynamics
Seth Lloyd
signal nonlocality
Skinwalker Ranch
social networks
space drive
space-time crystal
SPECTRA - UFO COMPUTER
spontaneous broken symmetry
SRI Remote Viewing Experiments
Stanford Physics
Stanford Research Institute
Star Gate
Star Ship
Star Trek Q
Stargate
Starship
Stephen Hawking
Steven Weinberg
stretched membrane
string theory
strong force gluons
Stuart Hameroff
superconducting meta-material
supersymmetry
symmetries
telepathy
Templeton
The Guardian
Thought Police
time crystal
time travel
topological computers
Topological Computing
torsion
UFO
Unitarity
unitary S-Matrix false?
Unruh effect
Uri Geller
VALIS
virtual particle
Virtual Reality
Warp Drive
weak force
Wheeler-Feynman
WIMP
WMAP
WMD
world crystal lattice
wormhole
Yakir Aharonov
Yuri Milner
Archive ...
November 2015
(1)
January 2015
(1)
December 2014
(1)
August 2014
(2)
July 2014
(2)
June 2014
(2)
May 2014
(1)
April 2014
(6)
March 2014
(6)
February 2014
(1)
January 2014
(3)
December 2013
(5)
November 2013
(8)
October 2013
(13)
September 2013
(8)
August 2013
(12)
July 2013
(3)
June 2013
(32)
May 2013
(3)
April 2013
(6)
March 2013
(6)
February 2013
(15)
January 2013
(5)
December 2012
(15)
November 2012
(15)
October 2012
(18)
September 2012
(12)
August 2012
(15)
July 2012
(30)
June 2012
(13)
May 2012
(18)
April 2012
(12)
March 2012
(28)
February 2012
(15)
January 2012
(25)
December 2011
(29)
November 2011
(30)
October 2011
(39)
September 2011
(22)
August 2011
(41)
July 2011
(42)
June 2011
(24)
May 2011
(13)
April 2011
(13)
March 2011
(15)
February 2011
(17)
January 2011
(31)
December 2010
(19)
November 2010
(22)
October 2010
(31)
September 2010
(41)
August 2010
(30)
July 2010
(27)
June 2010
(12)
May 2010
(20)
April 2010
(19)
March 2010
(27)
February 2010
(34)
Scroll To Top