1. arXiv:1502.02058 [pdf]
2. arXiv:1411.3762 [pdf]

On Nov 22, 2015, at 11:32 AM, JACK SARFATTI <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.> wrote:

At this point we all need to re-read Sutherland very careful starting with the 2006 paper and instead of making wild unsupported generally false or muddled statements about his work - we all need to copy and paste relevant text and equations point by point in a close analysis because his claims are of such fundamental importance for the foundations of quantum theory. I will start doing just that rather than dealing with the polemics and ersatz metaphysics of the New Agers.
### No-communication theorem - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

###
[PDF]The No-Signalling Theorems: A Nitpicking Distinction Kent A ...

### From the No-Signaling Theorem to Veiled Nonlocality

###
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.">Subquantum Information and Computation

###
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.">Pilot-wave theory: Everett in denial? - Antony Valentini - Vimeo

**THE WORD MADE FLESH**
**IT FROM BIT**
### Quantum Dialogue: The Making of a Revolution, Beller

### Quantum Theory at the Crossroads: Reconsidering the 1927 ...

The new physics of R. I. Sutherland is, in my understanding

1) Bohm trajectories are revealed albeit approximately by intermediate Aharonov weak measurements between LOCAL initial and final strong measurements also called boundary conditions. Real experiments by Aephraim Sternberg for photons confirm this.

2) Retrocausality in the weak measurements is shown in the Lagrangian formalism that is locally specially relativistically invariant i.e. all quantities are tensors under the Lorentz group. The boundary conditions are irrelevant to this Lorentz symmetry of the dynamics.

3) Configuration space for entangled particles is replaced by Costa de Beauregard zig zags same as for Cramer’s TI and Hu Price and Ken Wharton’s papers.

4) Aharonov, Sutherland, Price, Wharton et-al are only interested in orthodox quantum limit with no-entanglement signaling assumed.

In physics, the no-communication theorem is a no-go theorem from quantum .... " Begging the Signaling Question: Quantum Signaling and the Dynamics of ...

people.uleth.ca/~kent.peacock/FQXi_v2.pdf

University of Lethbridge

by KA Peacock - Cited by 1 - Related articles

Shortly before his untimely death, John Stewart Bell remarked that his famous theoremtells us “that ... There are numerous no-signalling proofs in the literature.
arxiv.org › physics

arXiv

by S Kak - 2013 - Cited by 10 - Related articles

Sep 24, 2013 - Abstract: According to the no-signaling theorem, the nonlocal collapse of the wavefunction of an entangled particle by the measurement on its ...
5) Sutherland’s Lagrangian equations include my “back-reaction” from particle to wave that violates orthodox quantum no-signaling. Sutherland calls this “action-reaction”.

arxiv.org › quant-ph

arXiv

by A Valentini - 2002 - Cited by 57 - Related articles

Mar 11, 2002 - Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph). Journal reference: Pramana - J. Phys. ... From: Antony Valentini [view email] [v1] Mon, 11 Mar 2002 ...
You've visited this page many times. Last visit: 10/22/15

Sutherland’s Lagrangian has the form for weak measurements

L = L(classical be able) + L(quantum) + L(post-quantum back-reaction)

In orthodox no-signaling quantum theory the thought-like mental quantum wave function is a complete description of physical reality.

vimeo.com › Philosophy of Physics › Videos

Vimeo

May 20, 2009

... theory: Everett in denial? - Antony Valentini" by Philosophy of Physics on Vimeo, the home for high ...
Obviously, in that case

L(classical be able) = 0

L(post-quantum back-reaction) = 0

This is the case for Copenhagen, transactional interpretation, and all forms of many worlds.

This is insane in my opinion and it leads to all sorts of ridiculous Rube Goldberg pseudo-problems well described in Nick Herbert’s books

e.g. collapse of the wave function - this is a literal miracle corresponding to the theological

Wheeler calls this

I claim that mainstream quantum theorists and philosophers have been brainwashed into this Laputan paradigm because of the immense charisma of Niels Bohr and his false victory over de Broglie and Einstein as well as the demonization and isolation of David Bohm. The book by Mara Beller

press.uchicago.edu/ucp/.../bo3628344.html

"Science is rooted in conversations," wrote Werner Heisenberg, one of the twentieth century's great physicists. In Quantum Dialogue, Mara Beller shows that ...
University of Chicago Press

proves what I am professing here.

See also

arxiv.org › quant-ph

arXiv

by G Bacciagaluppi - 2006 - Cited by 24 - Related articles

Sep 24, 2006 - Quantum Physics. Title: Quantum Theory at the Crossroads: Reconsidering the 1927 Solvay Conference ... From: Antony Valentini [view email]
You've visited this page 2 times. Last visit: 9/6/15

6) L(post-quantum back-reaction) ~ (be able particle 4-velocity - pilot wave 4-current/invariant 4-current density) ….

Therefore orthodox quantum theory corresponds exactly to de Broglie’s pilot wave condition = zero back reaction = sub-quantum equilibrium

In this case the pilot wave stream lines are identical to the be able- trajectories.

This is why as a practical matter we can pretend there are no beables for all traditional lab tests and technology on dead matter - closed systems.

My thesis is that pumped open dissipative structures (e.g. Frohlich model) with macro-quantum coherence have back-reaction with violation of the de Broglie piloting.

The pilot wave stream lines no longer match the Bohm be able trajectories.

Cramer’s cancellation of phases in his transaction no longer happens.

Retrocausal signals happen e.g. brain presponse.

Post quantum physics is to quantum physics as general relativity is to special relativity in the sense of the general action-reaction principle.

7) all of the above is for particles. Doing quantum electrodynamics (also weak and strong) and quantum geometrodynamics is more complicated. Sutherland had made some progress on this issue.

8) Finally the back-reaction of classical charges on the EM field is irrelevant to our concern here - that is all classical physics in L(be-able

Category: MyBlog

Published on Sunday, 22 November 2015 12:37