Text Size
Facebook Twitter More...

Begin forwarded message:

From: Thorn Alley <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Subject: Sarfatti's V6 DARPA-NASA Star Ship paper & GARgantuan GENEtics F0RD
Date: October 28, 2011 4:20:03 PM PDT
To: Brian Greene <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>, JACK SARFATTI <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>, Paul Murad <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>, 

V6 DARPA-NASA Star Ship paper

I look forward to the day when a
parallel timeline produces an artificial
intelligence derived from a JACK SARFATTI
duplicate event horizon stationed in a low
planetary orbit housed in a superluminal
propellantless communications vehicle that
manages to thread a tunnel across relevent
temporal bifurcations expediting a link to
a circa 1950's Earth timeline where a call
is placed to Flatbush New York to a young
Jack Sarfatti whose mind is subsequently
blown and the rest is high strangeness
negative entropy whoopee math history!

<> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
<> A Physicist Explains Why Parallel Universes
<> May Exist:  [...]     "But there's a more
<> confounding aspect of quantum theory that
<> receives less attention.
<>   After decades of closely studying quantum
<> mechanics, and after having accumulated a
<> wealth of data confirming its probabilistic
<> predictions, no one has been able to explain
<> why only one of the many possible outcomes
<> in any given situation actually happens.
<>   When we do experiments, when we examine
<> the world, we all agree that we encounter
<> a single definite reality. Yet, more than
<> a century after the quantum revolution
<> began, there is no consensus among the
<> world's physicists as to how this basic
<> fact is compatible with the theory's
<> mathematical expression." [...]
<> Excerpted from 'The Hidden Reality'
<>  by Brian Greene
<>   Copyright 2011 by Brian Greene.
<>    http://www.iscap.columbia.edu

-----0rigami Massage-----
| From: JACK SARFATTI <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
| To: JACK SARFATTI <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
| Subject: CIA, Reagan Admin & Entanglement
|          Signaling 1980's & David Kaiser's
|          book Hippies Saved Physics
| Date: Oct 27, 2011 12:10 PM

On Oct 27, 2011, at 11:46 AM, Paul Murad wrote:


Is your entanglement signaling EM or what?

NO! Not necessarily. We can use EM waves,
but need not do so. Any matter field will do.

The math is in my V6 DARPA-NASA Star Ship paper
at the end.

Entanglement signaling uses the macro-quantum
coherent stiff Bohm quantum potential that pilots
the classical EM field for example - not the
classical EM field itself.

Also we can use massive particles, e.g. entangled
quantum dot qubits stored in a solid substrate
on board the starship as the receiver states
entangled with some non-orthogonal Bose-Einstein
condensate sender states back at the Pentagon,
Langley whatever. David Kaiser describes this in
his book "How the Hippies Save Physics" in my
memoranda for CIA & Reagan Admin back in late
1970's and early 1980's - I did not have a scheme
that would work back then - but I think I do now.
CIA Chief of Station Harold Chipman was setting
up a think tank for me at USF in mid-80's, but he
was murdered (radiation poisoning by KGB - or so
he thought as he lay dying - payback for his Urals
bio-weapons black op that went awry killing many
Russians earlier).

And are you entangling without EM?  I bet it is....

This is the point... We need to look at different
types of communications...

From: JACK SARFATTI <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
To: JACK SARFATTI <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 2:14 PM
Subject: Re: Moon Square and Pyramid-
Solar System Anomalies

Advanced ETs, IF they exist, do not use
retarded EM waves. They use entanglement
signaling as in V6 final version of my
DARPA Star Ship paper. (unless someone can
point out an error in my recent argument) 


In a recent PBS interview, promoting
his upcoming 4-Part NOVA special,
Brian Greene said he did not think the
'faster than light neutrinos' results
will ultimately prove to be accurate. 
He also said he doesn't 'believe' in
multiple universes, instead he
articulated an interest in exploring
their possibility, citing that many
things we now accept as fact, like
Black Holes, etc., were once
considered farfetched except in
mathematical hypothesis. -- eMpTy


- 'OPERA' - 'Oscillation Project with
Emulsion-tRacking Apparatus'

The OPERA experiment has been designed
to perform the most straightforward test of
the phenomenon of neutrino oscillations.
This experiment exploits the CNGS high-intensity
and high-energy beam of muon neutrinos produced
at the CERN SPS in Geneva pointing towards the
LNGS underground laboratory at Gran Sasso,
730 km away in central Italy. OPERA is located
in the Hall C of LNGS and it is aimed at
detecting for the first time the appearance of
tau-neutrinos from the transmutation (oscillation)
of muon-neutrinos during their 3 millisecond
travel from Geneva to Gran Sasso. In OPERA,
tau-leptons resulting from the interaction of
tau-neutrinos will be observed in "bricks" of
photographic emulsion films interleaved with
lead plates. The apparatus contains about 150000
of such bricks for a total mass of 1300 tons and
is complemented by electronic detectors (trackers
and spectrometers) and ancillary infrastructure.
Its construction has been completed in spring 2008
and the experiment is currently in data taking.

23 Sep 2011 -- CERN

OPERA experiment invites
scrutiny of unexpected results

Neutrino beams from CERN in Switzerland
are sent over 700km through the Earth's crust
to the laboratory in Italy.

The OPERA experiment, which observes a
neutrino beam from CERN 730 km away at
Italy's INFN Gran Sasso Laboratory, will
present new results in a seminar at
CERN today.

The OPERA result is based on the observation
of over 15000 neutrino events measured at
Gran Sasso, and appears to indicate that the
neutrinos travel at a velocity 20 parts per
million above the speed of light, nature's
cosmic speed limit. Given the potential
far-reaching consequences of such a result,
independent measurements are needed before
the effect can either be refuted or firmly
established. This is why the OPERA
collaboration has decided to open the
result to broader scrutiny.


Measurement of the neutrino velocity
with the OPERA detector in the CNGS beam
(Submitted on 22 Sep 2011)

Abstract: The OPERA neutrino experiment at
the underground Gran Sasso Laboratory has
measured the velocity of neutrinos from
the CERN CNGS beam over a baseline of about
730 km with much higher accuracy than
previous studies conducted with accelerator
neutrinos. The measurement is based on
high-statistics data taken by OPERA in the
years 2009, 2010 and 2011. Dedicated upgrades
of the CNGS timing system and of the OPERA
detector, as well as a high precision geodesy
campaign for the measurement of the neutrino
baseline, allowed reaching comparable
systematic and statistical accuracies.
An early arrival time of CNGS muon neutrinos
with respect to the one computed assuming the
speed of light in vacuum of (60.7 \pm 6.9
(stat.) \pm 7.4 (sys.)) ns was measured.
This anomaly corresponds to a relative
difference of the muon neutrino velocity
with respect to the speed of light
(v-c)/c = (2.48 \pm 0.28 (stat.) \pm 0.30
(sys.)) \times 10-5.
Subjects:  High Energy Physics -
Experiment (hep-ex)
Cite as:  arXiv:1109.4897v1 [hep-ex]
Submission history
| From: Pasquale Migliozzi Dr.
[v1] Thu, 22 Sep 2011 17:59:33 GMT (4763kb)


-----0rigami Massage-----
| From: Gary G Ford <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
| To: Millennium <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
| Subject: Re: 28|0ct|2OII Fwd: Completed Story
|          Re: Sirius Shift, Sirius (Parallax) Disclosure! !!
| Date: Oct 28, 2011 9:58 AM

Greetings Millennium!  Thank you for the insight,
that an alternate method of local star parallax
calculation may give different, and hopefully more
correct, distances to nearby stars!  Not being
an Astronomer of any kind, except a once youthful 
star gazer of now damaged eyesight and other problems
of accelerated age, I find now that I have been,
despite my natural inclinations when confronted
by the "free gifts"/manipulating self-serving
intellectual leavings of cloistered, in effect
closed, professional priesthoods, allowing myself
to be deceived over my decades since childhood!

Critical Information Held Back - Secrets of More
Direct and Accurate Understanding - purposeful
half truths ... these are the veneer of secretive
science and all other closely held true knowledge.

Physics - Physicists? - Yes, perhaps we should
not be over critical of these often unfortunate
life-long struggling inductees, who well labored
hard to learn and understand, thus even to
memorize and come to deeply believe all of the
intricate details required to connect deceptively
simplistic seeming steps, outlined by masters of
their subjects, details which less honest and
lazier acolytes would merely feign to have
produced and understood, and of course, as always,
as ultimate conditioning requirement of any cult,
to Believe Without Any Doubts, those Purposely
Left Incomplete Doctrinal Points which they had
mastered, so acquiring, over long progression of
their hard fought education and slow rise
in career, in the Medievally
Formulated, Elite and
Pretentious Fields

May Vested Interests on High,
Bellow in Pain, that Their
SECRETS are being

"Let Us Sail Upon The Cosmic Seas
And Move Around Too Far In Time!"

On 28/10/2011 9:03 AM, Millennium wrote:
thanks for the discussion,
here is the original article, with the
illustrations, which are perhaps 99 percent
of the 'Awakening' ...

Sirius Shift, Sirius (Parallax) Disclosure!
by Millennium Twain on Monday, 24 October
2011 at 13:03

So what is Stellar Parallax, Annual Parallax?

How does it relate to Stellar Distance, the distance
of Alpha Centauri and Sirius in particular?

What is the difference between a distance of
a mere Lightyear, and that of a Parsec?

How does the Covert Institution of Astrophysics
ACTUALLY determine Stellar Distance from Parallax?

And how does that compare to the fluff, disinfo,
they tell the public?

Why does Aerospace & Astrophysics defraud the public?


antecedents: $IRIUS DI$?LO$URE, Alpha ...

...  ~~

reply to questionss:

Millennium Twain

all our institutions are covert, and all are
'tongue-in-cheek' when you are brought up in
them. you will notice the scientific parallax
formula was created with a 'Gauge', factor,
which gives Parsecs (Parallax Seconds!) as
an answer when ArcSeconds are used for the
astrometric measurement angle. my (approximate)
derivation for the Covert Error Factor as of
this month was 2.5, a convergence from the
factor of 2-4 that we have been discussing
the last few years -- thus yielding 1.7
lightyears distance for Alpha Centauri
(with a co-helical trajectory period of
52,000 years) and, again, 3.4 lightyears
for the distance of Sirius (with a co-helical
trajectory period of 104,000 years).

however, if we take the convenience, and
the humour, of 'Father', of 'Big Brother',
of our Corporate-Peer-Society into account;
I strongly suspect that an exact conversion
factor of 3.26 would be the 'Covert Fudge
Factor of Choice'. (1 Parsec = 3.26163626
light years -- which is to say that the
'Parsec' star distance figures used in
all the publications of the Covert
Astronomical and Astrophysical institutions
are only meant to be read as Parsecs by the
slaves, the cattle, the consumers, the public.
the Aero/Astro institution, and their
managers, would all read them, know them,
however as Lightyears!)

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
http://www.fastmail.fm - mmm... Fastmail...

-=[[ High Precision Parallax Collecting Satellite
Hipparcos http://www.rssd.esa.int/Hipparcos/ ]]=-


-----END 0F 0R1GAM1 MA55AG3S-----

Hey, Maestro-Mahatma F0RD!
I was thinking about your recent
mathemagickal utterance regarding
the SPITTING of White Hole's
informational content into a parallel
inflating reverse singularity where
mistakes are illusions due to the
TIMELINES inflating entire realms
of cross pollinating MindGland Memes,
trans-temporally retrieved memories;
and Lo, I beheld a WORLD where Jim
Morrison sang for The Rolling Stones,
and Mick Jagger sang for The Doors,
only Morrison's group was actually
called The Rolling Tulips, whose
lead guitarist was none other than
Tiny Tim, and Miss Vicky was the
President of The United States!


V6 DARPA-NASA Star Ship paper

Category: MyBlog

Categories ...

't Hooft 100 Year Star Ship Abner Shimony accelerometers action-reaction principle Aephraim Sternberg Alan Turing Albert Einstein Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer American Institute of Physics Andrija Puharich Anthony Valentin Anton Zeilinger Antony Valentini anyon Apple Computer Artificial Intelligence Asher Peres Back From The Future Basil Hiley Bell's theorem Ben Affleck Ben Libet Bernard Carr Bill Clinton black body radiation Black Hole black hole firewall black hole information paradox black holes Bohm brain waves Brian Josephson Broadwell Cambridge University Carnot Heat Engine Central Intelligence Agency CIA Clive Prince closed time like curves coherent quantum state Consciousness conservation laws Cosmic Landscape Cosmological Constant cosmology CTC cyber-bullying Dancing Wu Li Masters Dark Energy Dark Matter DARPA Daryl Bem David Bohm David Deutsch David Gross David Kaiser David Neyland David Tong de Sitter horizon Dean Radin Deepak Chopra delayed choice Demetrios A. Kalamidas Demetrios Kalamidas Dennis Sciama Destiny Matrix Dick Bierman Doppler radars E8 group Einstein's curved spacetime gravity Einstein's happiest thought electromagnetism Eli Cartan EMP Nuclear Attack entanglement signals ER=EPR Eric Davis Ernst Mach ET Eternal Chaotic Inflation evaporating black holes Facebook Faster-Than-Light Signals? fictitious force firewall paradox flying saucers FQXi Frank Tipler Frank Wilczek Fred Alan Wolf Free Will G.'t Hooft Garrett Moddel Gary Zukav gauge theory general relativity Geometrodynamics Gerard 't Hooft Giancarlo Ghirardi God Goldstone theorem gravimagnetism gravity Gravity - the movie gravity gradiometers gravity tetrads Gravity Waves Gregory Corso gyroscopes hacking quantum cryptographs Hagen Kleinert Hal Puthoff Hawking radiation Heisenberg Henry Stapp Herbert Gold Higgs boson Higgs field hologram universe Horizon How the Hippies Saved Physics I.J. Good ICBMs Igor Novikov inertial forces inertial navigation Inquisition Internet Iphone Iran Isaac Newton Israel Jack Sarfatti Jacques Vallee James F. Woodward James Woodward JASON Dept of Defense Jeffrey Bub Jesse Ventura Jim Woodward John Archibald Wheeler John Baez John Cramer John S. Bell Ken Peacock Kip Thorne Kornel Lanczos La Boheme Laputa Large Hadron Collider Lenny Susskind Leonard Susskind Levi-Civita connection LHC CERN libel Louis de Broglie Lubos Motl LUX Lynn Picknett M-Theory Mach's Principle Mae Jemison Making Starships and Star Gates Martin Rees Mathematical Mind MATRIX Matter-AntiMatter Asymmetry Max Tegmark Menas Kafatos Michael Persinger Michael Towler microtubules Milky way MIT MOSSAD multiverse NASA Nick Bostrum Nick Herbert Nobel Prize nonlocality Obama organized-stalking Origin of Inertia P. A. M. Dirac P.K.Dick P.W. Anderson Paranormal parapsychology Paul Werbos Perimeter Institute Petraeus Physical Review Letters Physics Today Post-Quantum Physics pre-Big Bang precognition presponse PSI WARS Psychic Repression qualia Quantum Chromodynamics quantum computers quantum entanglement quantum field theory quantum gravity Quantum Information Theory Quantum Theory RAF Spitfires Ray Chiao Red Chinese Remote Viewing retrocausality Reviews of Modern Physics Richard Feynman Richard P. Feynman Rindler effect Robert Anton Wilson Robert Bigelow Roger Penrose rotating black holes Roy Glauber Rupert Sheldrake Russell Targ Ruth Elinor Kastner S-Matrix Sagnac effect Sam Ting Sanford Underground Research Facility Sarfatti Lectures in Physics Scientific American Second Law of Thermodynamics Seth Lloyd signal nonlocality Skinwalker Ranch social networks space drive space-time crystal SPECTRA - UFO COMPUTER spontaneous broken symmetry SRI Remote Viewing Experiments Stanford Physics Stanford Research Institute Star Gate Star Ship Star Trek Q Stargate Starship Stephen Hawking Steven Weinberg stretched membrane string theory strong force gluons Stuart Hameroff superconducting meta-material supersymmetry symmetries telepathy Templeton The Guardian Thought Police time crystal time travel topological computers Topological Computing torsion UFO Unitarity unitary S-Matrix false? Unruh effect Uri Geller VALIS virtual particle Virtual Reality Warp Drive weak force Wheeler-Feynman WIMP WMAP WMD world crystal lattice wormhole Yakir Aharonov Yuri Milner