Text Size
Facebook Twitter More...


1) is entanglement signaling with entangled Glauber states possible because they are over-complete non-orthogonal and distinguishable with a non-unitary dynamics (nonlinear non-unitary Landau-Ginzburg c-number ODLRO eq replaces nonlocal linear Schrodinger 2nd-quantized eq in Fock number space - e.g. paper by Jorge Berger cited in my http://journalofcosmology.com/SarfattiConsciousness.pdf ?
2) Is dark energy Hawking-Unruh thermal radiation from our future event horizon that is a Wheeler-Feynman total absorber? The Hawking radiation density on the horizon Lp thick is hc/Lp^4 with temperature hc/LpkB. The advanced waves back from the future to us are red-shifted down to temperature hc/(LpA^1/2)^1/2 to us - and as is well known the advanced Wheeler-Feynman Hawking radiation looks like zero point virtual photons at that stage. Plugging in the T^4 black body radiation law gives dark energy density hc/Lp^2A as actually measured where A is the area/Hawking entropy of our future horizon, where our future light cone crosses it.

3) Is this horizon a Seth Lloyd computer and is it also a ’t Hooft-Susskind hologram screen with us as its retro-causally Aharonov post-selected computed 3D images along with all the matter fields in the interior bulk of the causal diamond of both past (pre-selected) and future 2D horizons?

it’s all in the formalism - interpretation independent.

 

|Alice, Bob) ~ |A)|B) + |A’)|B’)

 

(A|A) = 1 et-al

 

(A|A’) =/= 0 when A =/= A’

 

(B|B’) =/= 0 when B =/= B’

 

P(B) = Trace over A & A’ {|B)(B| |Alice, Bob)(Alice,Bob|}

 

i.e.

 

|A)|B)(B|(A| + |A)|B)(B’|(A’| + |A’)|B’)(B’|(A’| + |A’)|B’)(B|(A|

 

 

Trace ---)

 

(B|(A|{|A)|B)(B|(A| + |A)|B)(B’|(A’| + |A’)|B’)(B’|(A’| + |A’)|B’)(B|(A|}|A)|B)

 

+(B| (A’|{|A)|B)(B|(A| + |A)|B)(B’|(A’| + |A’)|B’)(B’|(A’| + |A’)|B’)(B|(A|}|A’)|B)

 

= {(B|(A||A)|B)(B|(A||A)|B) + (B|(A||A)|B)(B’|(A’||A)|B) + (B|(A||A’)|B’)(B’|(A’||A)|B) + (B|(A||A’)|B’)(B|(A||A)|B)}

 

+|{(B| (A’|A)|B)(B|(A||A’)|B) + (B| (A’|A)|B)(B’|(A’||A’)|B) + (B| (A’|A’)|B’)(B’|(A’| |A’)|B)+(B| (A’ |A’)|B’)(B|(A||A’)|B)}

 

= {1 + (B’||B)(A’||A) + (B||B’)(B’||B)(A||A’)(A’||A) + (B|B’)|(A||A’)(A||A)}

 

+|{ (A’|A)(A||A’) + (A’|A)(A’||A’)(B’||B) + (B||B’) (B’||B)+(B||B’) (A||A’)}

 

= {1 + (B’||B)(A’||A) +|(B||B’)|^2|(A||A’)|^2 + (B|B’)|(A||A’)|^2}

 

+|{ |(A’|A)|^2 + (A’|A)(B’||B) + |(B||B’)|^2 +(B||B’) (A||A’)}

 

THE ABOVE ALGEBRA NEEDS TO BE CHECKED FOR ERRORS.

 

In the special case that two Glauber SENDER states |A) and |A’) are entangled with a single qubit B i.e. (B|B’) = 0

 

then

 

P(B) ~ 1 + |(A||A’)|^2

 

This is an entanglement signal because of the  |(A||A’)|^2 MODULATION term absent in the usual states used e.g. in Aspect’s experiment where Alice and Bob are both micro-qubit states instead of macro-QUBIT Glauber states.

 

Born’s probability interpretation breaks down completely here because of distinguishable over-complete non-orthgonal base states used in the entanglement.

 

 


This is an entanglement signal because of the  ||^2 MODULATION term absent in the usual states used e.g. in Aspect’s experiment where Alice and Bob are both micro-qubit states instead of macro-QUBIT Glauber states.
Born’s probability interpretation breaks down completely here because of distinguishable over-complete non-orthgonal base states used in the entanglement.
_______________________________________________
ExoticPhysics mailing list
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
http://mail.softcafe.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/exoticphysics

Category: MyBlog

Categories ...

't Hooft 100 Year Star Ship Abner Shimony accelerometers action-reaction principle Aephraim Sternberg Alan Turing Albert Einstein Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer American Institute of Physics Andrija Puharich Anthony Valentin Anton Zeilinger Antony Valentini anyon Apple Computer Artificial Intelligence Asher Peres Back From The Future Basil Hiley Bell's theorem Ben Affleck Ben Libet Bernard Carr Bill Clinton black body radiation Black Hole black hole firewall black hole information paradox black holes Bohm brain waves Brian Josephson Broadwell Cambridge University Carnot Heat Engine Central Intelligence Agency CIA Clive Prince closed time like curves coherent quantum state Consciousness conservation laws Cosmic Landscape Cosmological Constant cosmology CTC cyber-bullying Dancing Wu Li Masters Dark Energy Dark Matter DARPA Daryl Bem David Bohm David Deutsch David Gross David Kaiser David Neyland David Tong de Sitter horizon Dean Radin Deepak Chopra delayed choice Demetrios A. Kalamidas Demetrios Kalamidas Dennis Sciama Destiny Matrix Dick Bierman Doppler radars E8 group Einstein's curved spacetime gravity Einstein's happiest thought electromagnetism Eli Cartan EMP Nuclear Attack entanglement signals ER=EPR Eric Davis Ernst Mach ET Eternal Chaotic Inflation evaporating black holes Facebook Faster-Than-Light Signals? fictitious force firewall paradox flying saucers FQXi Frank Tipler Frank Wilczek Fred Alan Wolf Free Will G.'t Hooft Garrett Moddel Gary Zukav gauge theory general relativity Geometrodynamics Gerard 't Hooft Giancarlo Ghirardi God Goldstone theorem gravimagnetism gravity Gravity - the movie gravity gradiometers gravity tetrads Gravity Waves Gregory Corso gyroscopes hacking quantum cryptographs Hagen Kleinert Hal Puthoff Hawking radiation Heisenberg Henry Stapp Herbert Gold Higgs boson Higgs field hologram universe Horizon How the Hippies Saved Physics I.J. Good ICBMs Igor Novikov inertial forces inertial navigation Inquisition Internet Iphone Iran Isaac Newton Israel Jack Sarfatti Jacques Vallee James F. Woodward James Woodward JASON Dept of Defense Jeffrey Bub Jesse Ventura Jim Woodward John Archibald Wheeler John Baez John Cramer John S. Bell Ken Peacock Kip Thorne Kornel Lanczos La Boheme Laputa Large Hadron Collider Lenny Susskind Leonard Susskind Levi-Civita connection LHC CERN libel Louis de Broglie Lubos Motl LUX Lynn Picknett M-Theory Mach's Principle Mae Jemison Making Starships and Star Gates Martin Rees Mathematical Mind MATRIX Matter-AntiMatter Asymmetry Max Tegmark Menas Kafatos Michael Persinger Michael Towler microtubules Milky way MIT MOSSAD multiverse NASA Nick Bostrum Nick Herbert Nobel Prize nonlocality Obama organized-stalking Origin of Inertia P. A. M. Dirac P.K.Dick P.W. Anderson Paranormal parapsychology Paul Werbos Perimeter Institute Petraeus Physical Review Letters Physics Today Post-Quantum Physics pre-Big Bang precognition presponse PSI WARS Psychic Repression qualia Quantum Chromodynamics quantum computers quantum entanglement quantum field theory quantum gravity Quantum Information Theory Quantum Theory RAF Spitfires Ray Chiao Red Chinese Remote Viewing retrocausality Reviews of Modern Physics Richard Feynman Richard P. Feynman Rindler effect Robert Anton Wilson Robert Bigelow Roger Penrose rotating black holes Roy Glauber Rupert Sheldrake Russell Targ Ruth Elinor Kastner S-Matrix Sagnac effect Sam Ting Sanford Underground Research Facility Sarfatti Lectures in Physics Scientific American Second Law of Thermodynamics Seth Lloyd signal nonlocality Skinwalker Ranch social networks space drive space-time crystal SPECTRA - UFO COMPUTER spontaneous broken symmetry SRI Remote Viewing Experiments Stanford Physics Stanford Research Institute Star Gate Star Ship Star Trek Q Stargate Starship Stephen Hawking Steven Weinberg stretched membrane string theory strong force gluons Stuart Hameroff superconducting meta-material supersymmetry symmetries telepathy Templeton The Guardian Thought Police time crystal time travel topological computers Topological Computing torsion UFO Unitarity unitary S-Matrix false? Unruh effect Uri Geller VALIS virtual particle Virtual Reality Warp Drive weak force Wheeler-Feynman WIMP WMAP WMD world crystal lattice wormhole Yakir Aharonov Yuri Milner