Text Size

Stardrive

 

  1. @creon: @JackSarfatti Haha! no superparticles, no dark matter particles.... what could it be ;-?
    This is good news for my explanation of dark matter as virtual fermion anti fermion pairs and dark energy as virtual bosons both inside the vacuum.
    Like · · Share
    • Gareth Lee Meredith I've been particularly drawn recently to the Einstein-Cartan model for as you will know, implementing the torsion fields in relativity as perhaps also an explanation towards other gravitational effects.
    • Jack Sarfatti There is no evidence for torsion independent of curvature as yet though it's a beautiful extension and it should be there, but it ain't. Similarly, supersymmetry is beautiful. It is the Dirac square root of translations, which when locally gauged are Einstein's general coordinate transformations corresponding to locally coincident non-inertial accelerating frames. Mathematical beauty does not ensure physical fact.
    • Jack Sarfatti God is both subtle & malicious! ;-)

Remember the key physics relevant to all this, is right here:
Subquantum Information and Computation
Antony Valentini
(Submitted on 11 Mar 2002 (v1), last revised 12 Apr 2002 (this version, v2))
It is argued that immense physical resources - for nonlocal communication, espionage, and exponentially-fast computation - are hidden from us by quantum noise, and that this noise is not fundamental but merely a property of an equilibrium state in which the universe happens to be at the present time. It is suggested that 'non-quantum' or nonequilibrium matter might exist today in the form of relic particles from the early universe. We describe how such matter could be detected and put to practical use. Nonequilibrium matter could be used to send instantaneous signals, to violate the uncertainty principle, to distinguish non-orthogonal quantum states without disturbing them, to eavesdrop on quantum key distribution, and to outpace quantum computation (solving NP-complete problems in polynomial time).
Comments:    10 pages, Latex, no figures. To appear in 'Proceedings of the Second Winter Institute on Foundations of Quantum Theory and Quantum Optics: Quantum Information Processing', ed. R. Ghosh (Indian Academy of Science, Bangalore, 2002). Second version: shortened at editor's request; extra material on outpacing quantum computation (solving NP-complete problems in polynomial time)
Subjects:    Quantum Physics (quant-ph)
Journal reference:    Pramana - J. Phys. 59 (2002) 269-277
DOI:    10.1007/s12043-002-0117-1
Report number:    Imperial/TP/1-02/15
Cite as:    arXiv:quant-ph/0203049
     (or arXiv:quant-ph/0203049v2 for this version)


http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0203049

On Nov 12, 2012, at 4:21 PM, Russ Targ <russtarg@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Jack,
At the same time, Price assured us that Spiro Agnew would not replace him. Price said "Don't worry. Agnew will be gone first. "
I am sure Hal can confirm this. Cheers
Russ
Sent from Russell's iPhone

On Nov 12, 2012, at 3:20 PM, Jack Sarfatti <sarfatti@pacbell.net> wrote:



Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:

From: Brian Josephson <bdj10@cam.ac.uk>
Date: November 12, 2012, 2:49:25 PM PST
To: JACK SARFATTI <sarfatti@pacbell.net>
Cc: "Puthoff@aol.com Puthoff@aol.com" <puthoff@aol.com>, John Alexander <nonlethal2@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Re Petraeus: “Psychic Spy” Data: Is There a White House Resignation in the Works? | ST...


On 12 Nov 2012, at 19:44, JACK SARFATTI wrote:

On Nov 12, 2012, at 11:31 AM, Puthoff@aol.com wrote:

Reminds me of a remote viewing by Pat Price during the Nixon years in our SRI program for the CIA in which he said that Nixon would not last out his second term due to an electronic device in the oval office.

Interestingly enough, remote viewer/astral traveller Alex Tanous made the reverse prediction at the Toronto PK conference in 1974, that Nixon would last out (this must have been about 2 months before his resignation).  He had however forseen the Apollo 13 difficulties.  He also claimed to remote view letters by Fermat re his last theorem, with some details about the logic (not similar to the actual proof).

On Nov 10, 2012, at 8:55 AM, John Alexander <nonlethal2@yahoo.com> wrote:

Hardly either since these things happen all the time and there are thousands of possible "affairs" to choose from.

I agree!  Did any psychic forsee the problems at the BBC?

Brian

------
Brian D. Josephson
Emeritus Professor of Physics, University of Cambridge
Director, Mind–Matter Unification Project
WWW: http://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~bdj10



Oh

On Nov 12, 2012, at 4:00 PM, d14947 <d14947@gmail.com> wrote:

I was right about the emails and the reason they were used.

Petraeus and Broadwell apparently used a trick, known to terrorists and teenagers alike, to conceal their email traffic, one of the law enforcement officials said.

Rather than transmitting emails to the other's inbox, they composed at least some messages and instead of transmitting them, left them in a draft folder or in an electronic "dropbox," the official said. Then the other person could log onto the same account and read the draft emails there. This avoids creating an email trail that is easier to trace.

On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 11:44 AM, JACK SARFATTI <sarfatti@pacbell.net> wrote:
Very interesting.
On Nov 12, 2012, at 11:31 AM, Puthoff@aol.com wrote:

Reminds me of a remote viewing by Pat Price during the Nixon years in our SRI program for the CIA in which he said that Nixon would not last out his second term due to an electronic device in the oval office.  Thinking of a health hazard, search for such did not turn up anything, and it was only after the fact that it could be identified in terms of the audio taping apparatus..
 
Hal Puthoff

http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0203049
 
In a message dated 11/12/2012 1:22:02 P.M. Central Standard Time, sarfatti@pacbell.net writes:

On Nov 12, 2012, at 11:10 AM, "Gary S. Bekkum" <garybekkum@yahoo.com> wrote:

I disagree. Very few 'affairs' rock entire executive administrations -- our data clearly identified OBAMA would be impacted by an "affair" "of the heart" involving someone who was a "military powers authority" as the result of a "whistleblower" resulting in Justice Department involvement -- where is the precedent for a similar public outing leading to investigative hearings?

In January 2010, our psychic intelligence provided basic information — apparently associated with a government-shaking resignation over an affair — that would involve the Obama administration. We reported on some of this intelligence in an article written for STARpod.org (published in March 2010):
The note also makes reference to “military powers authority”associated with “extraordinary measures” taken in response to an“affair” which was not further identified. A follow-on to the January 21 notes, dated January 31, 2010, again refers to “affair” and“Obama,” concerning Presidential Authority. The source of the above, according to the January 31 note, appears to be a“whistleblower” … An additional reference is made to “P^3″ which represents “players, plots, potentials,” concerning the “drama” which is expected to unfold. Several psychic spy notes have made reference to “affair” in the context of “heart,” in the context of the Justice Department concerning criminal activities and “witness protection.”
We assume in the context of current events that the “military powers authority” refers to Petraeus, who was a four-star general in the U.S. Army prior to becoming the Director of Central Intelligence at CIA. The “extraordinary measures” refer to the unusual situation of having a sitting Obama-appointed director resign over what is reportedly a personal affair, which had been revealed during an official FBI investigation on national security concerns. The above mentioned “presidential authority” refers to President Obama’s acceptance of Petraeus’ resignation request. The “whistleblower” may be a reference to a whistleblower who reportedly wanted to contact authorities in Congress over a “national security concern.”


Gary S Bekkum
STARstream Research
STARpod.org
STARpod.US
P.O. Box 1144
Maple Grove, MN 55311
VM (763) 439-0719

http://twitter.com/gary_s_bekkum

garybekkum@yahoo.com


From: JACK SARFATTI <sarfatti@pacbell.net>
To: John Alexander <nonlethal2@yahoo.com> Cc: Gary Bekkum <garybekkum@yahoo.com>; IFPA GROUP-EUROPE <ifpagroup@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2012 5:19 PM
Subject: Re: “Psychic Spy” Data: Is There a White House Resignation in the Works? | STARpod US

right
On Nov 10, 2012, at 8:55 AM, John Alexander <nonlethal2@yahoo.com> wrote:

Hardly either since these things happen all the time and there are thousands of possible "affairs" to choose from.

From: JACK SARFATTI <sarfatti@pacbell.net>
To: Gary S Bekkum <garysbekkum@gmail.com> Cc:
Sent: Friday, November 9, 2012 6:27 PM
Subject: Re: “Psychic Spy” Data: Is There a White House Resignation in the Works? | STARpod US

OK, maybe a precognitive remote viewing hit or maybe luck? ;-)
A 21 Jan 2010 “psychic spy” note referenced “non-essential Federal shutdown” days before a snowstorm shut down the government in Washington. The same note also referenced an “unhappy circle” in the Obama White House over an “affair.”


On Nov 9, 2012, at 5:37 PM, Gary S Bekkum <garysbekkum@gmail.com> wrote:

http://www.starpod.us/2010/03/06/psychic-spy-data-is-there-a-white-house-resignation-in-the-works/#.UJ2vlYznaSw
Gary S. Bekkum
STARpod.US
STARstream Research

  1. PhysOrg.com - Science, Research, Technology, Physics, Nanotech, Space News
    Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Computation
    • Jack Sarfatti Together this is a self-organizing creative feedback loop in time including retro-causal entanglement signal nonlocality in strong violation of orthodox quantum theory.
    • Jack Sarfatti Orthodox quantum theory breaks down for living matter in the same way that special relativity breaks down globally when there are real non-zero gravity (space-time curvature) fields present.
    • Jack Sarfatti Things impossible in the smaller theory are possible in the larger theory that contains the former as a limiting case when some set of control parameters vanish.
    • Jack Sarfatti This is new wine in new bottles.
    • Jack Sarfatti 2.1 of the dissertation is a bit disappointing - too vague & may have some errors like what is allegedly experienced inside the black hole, e.g., time is dilated and size contracted to the outside observer not to inside observer.
    • Jack Sarfatti Moving on "Ideal concurrency due to superposition must be valid for quantum states, otherwise placing a detector after one of the slits in the twin-slit experiment could not retroactively create the self-consistent effect of the single photon passing o...See More
    • Jack Sarfatti "Quantum-encoded states directly address both primary computation resources (i.e. space and time) by allowing an unlimited locality metric, thus eliminating the need for the sequential integration of partial results. Quantum systems are always self-con...See More
    • Jack Sarfatti 2.3.1 is not intelligible to me
    • Jack Sarfatti Moving on "Two major classes of quantum algorithm exist. The first class is the implementation of traditional classical algorithms using quantum implementations of reversible logic gates to be discussed later, such as Fredkin and Toffoli gates [24]. Quantum Finite State Automata (QFSA) also fall into this category. These algorithms may be useful for implementing traditional logic when the nanoelectronics scaling limit is reached; they only use classical states and offer no computation gain due to superposition or entanglement."
    • Jack Sarfatti I will only quote what I find intelligible.
    • Jack Sarfatti "The second class of quantum algorithm outperforms its classical counterpart by using superposition and entangled states. Shor’s factoring algorithm [34] (which uses the Quantum Fourier Transform (QFT)) and Grover’s quantum search algorithm [14] are the primary known algorithms in this class. A very useful outcome of the present research would be to create programming tools to aid in designing both classes of algorithms."
    • Jack Sarfatti My Cornell professor Wolfgang Rindler was also on this guy's committee in Dallas, Texas. But Rindler is very old and obviously did not read the dissertation line by line or he would have made cuts in the obscure badly written parts.
    • Jack Sarfatti Rindler and Roger Penrose did important work on spinors in gravity back in the 60's & 70's.
    • Jack Sarfatti "The second class of quantum algorithm outperforms its classical counterpart by using superposition and entangled states. Shor’s factoring algorithm [34] (which uses the Quantum Fourier Transform (QFT)) and Grover’s quantum search algorithm [14] are the primary known algorithms in this class. A very useful outcome of the present research would be to create programming tools to aid in designing both classes of algorithms."
    • Jack Sarfatti Homework Problem Set 1: find out details on QFT & Grover's algorithm.
    • Jack Sarfatti "A physical implementation of the currently largest (seven qubit) quantum computer was reported by the Los Alamos National Labs (LANL) in March 2000 [18], only 18 months after the first three qubit machine was reported (using Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) and customized molecules). Early in 2002, IBM announced Shor’s algorithm factored the number 15 into factors three and five, running on a seven qubit NMR quantum computer. Nanodots
      (single 3D-confined quantum states) and nanomolecules (4-5 coupled nanodots) are the long term hope for quantum computers because they represent the continuation of contemporary semiconductor-based scaling methodology into the quantum computing domain."
    • Jack Sarfatti See also Kitaev on anyonic topological quantum computing with string theory braiding implemented in fractional quantum Hall effect? Still a dream.
    • Jack Sarfatti Hameroff's protein dimers wrapped around the micro-tubules are our "quantum nano dots".
    • Jack Sarfatti "Quantum computation follows an algorithm or recipe of operations, starting with initializing the qubits to known states. At the end of evolving the system state using a programmed sequence of operators, the final evolved state must be measured to produce the answer, which has the side effect of destroying the coherent information represented in the evolved state. This measurement process is called a projection, because the high dimensional states are reduced to a single classical bit vector result inside the measurement apparatus. Anywhere during this process, noise can also modify the system state, acting like an unwanted operator or measurement. For these reasons, redundancy of state with error correction techniques has been successfully applied to the evolution of quantum states. Designing quantum computers and algorithms is still in its infancy, but significant
      engineering progress has been made over the last ten years."
    • Jack Sarfatti Aharonov's weak measurements with back-from-the-future post-selection are a new dimension to the above narrative based only on Von Neuman's strong projection operator measurements. Weak measurements are not irreversible. Strong measurements are. Combining both in clever ways as Aephraim Steinberg has done in Toronto gives new precision techniques useful to the coming quantum computer technology. CIA & Lockheed already using primitive D-Wave quantum chips like Apple's first LISA.
  2. Places
    See All
    10 Recent Places

    Jack Sarfatti was at Lombards Street - Most Crooked Street and 9 other places.
    See All Stories
    • Jack Sarfatti "CHAPTER 2
      THE UNIVERSE IS A QUANTUM COMPUTER
      The universe is really a very large extended quantum simulation [12] whose outcome is the classical world view we experience around us. This fact is accepted because the inverse scenario is impossible, since classical computers cannot efficiently simulate quantum mechanical systems. Even empty space and black holes are filled by invisible, nonphysical quantum states (or zero-point energy), which represent a very high-dimensional quantum foam or ether that can only be observed as a small projection into our 4D spacetime."
    • Jack Sarfatti "This accepted understanding means that quantum states are protophysical [28], since they are more fundamental than classical entities such as space, time, energy, or matter. This idea agrees with the “big bang” theory of cosmic evolution in which quantum states existed before classical features appeared. Since primitive quantum states encode (or are) information, information is primitive and the start of the universe represents a quantum “bit bang” [23]."
    • Jack Sarfatti Yes, I have been saying this for years.
    • Jack Sarfatti These ideas are catching on.
    • Jack Sarfatti "Black holes are therefore bit buckets, due to the combined laws of thermodynamics, quantum mechanics, gravity, and information theory. The surface area of the black hole is known as its event horizon (or entropy, measured in bits), and represents the boundary between our physical 4D spacetime and the quantum dimensions inside (that form the singularity)."
    • ‎+ Brief History http://t.co/McSGFHBv
      lnkd.in
      I began work in the field of atomic astrophysics, and worked on the problem of di-electronic recombination in the solar corona. I then moved into cosmology, and the theory of black holes, especially their quantum and thermodynamic properties. During the 1970's and 1980's I helped develop the theory …

See accompanying Physics Viewpoint
Using a superconducting circuit, the Josephson mixer, we demonstrate the first experimental realization of spatially separated two-mode squeezed states of microwave light. Driven by a pump tone, a first Josephson mixer generates, out of quantum vacuum, a pair of entangled fields at different frequencies on separate transmission lines. A second mixer, driven by a π-phase shifted copy of the first pump tone, recombines and disentangles the two fields. The resulting output noise level is measured to be lower than for the vacuum state at the input of the second mixer, an unambiguous proof of entanglement. Moreover, the output noise level provides a direct, quantitative measure of entanglement, leading here to the demonstration of 6  Mebit·s-1 (mega entangled bits per second) generated by the first mixer.
© 2012 American Physical Society
URL:    http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.183901
DOI:    10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.183901
PACS:    42.65.Lm, 03.67.-a, 84.40.Dc, 85.25.-j
*Corresponding author.
benjamin.huard@ens.fr

Can we adapt this technique to make for Alice & Bob spatially separated

|Alice, Bob> = (1/2)^1/2[|zAlice>|z'Bob> + |z"Alice>|z"'Bob>]

for distinguishable non-orthogonal over-complete macro-quantum coherent Glauber states |z> where the z's are complex numbers of wave amplitude and phase.

Therefore, the now violated Born rule is

P(z'Bob) = TraceAlice{|Alice,Bob><Bob,Alice| |z'Bob><Bobz'|} = (1/2)(1 + |<Alicez|z"Alice>|^2)

giving a non-local entanglement signal.

Of course one can force the ad-hoc normalization

|Alice, Bob> = (1/2(1 + |<Alicez|z"Alice>|^2))^1/2[|zAlice>|z'Bob> + |z"Alice>|z"'Bob>]

to get P(z'Bob) = 1/2

but this seems odd to my intuition since the normalization needed will depend on the future free will choice that Bob makes.
Such retro-causal delayed choice normalization of the entangled state is not part of orthodox quantum theory. The orthodox quantum pundits have a real dilemma here. ;-)

The brain has a macro-quantum coherent Glauber state of emergent quasi-particles. In the Bohm ontological interpretation, these real on-mass-shell quasi-particles have a quantum potential. The macro-quantum coherent Bohm potential is the instrinsic mental field. In orthodox quantum theory with no-entanglement signaling, the Bohm mental potential modifies the motion of the quasiparticles in addition to any classical forces on them. However, there is no direct back-reaction of these quasiparticles on their piloting Bohm potential. In that limit there is no conscious qualia experience. When back-reaction is present conscious qualia emerges in a two-way action-reaction self-organizing loop between the Bohm potential and its quasiparticles. The quasiparticles may be anyonic surface excitations on the microtubule dimer sheafs (e.g. Stuart Hameroff) that couple to the nerve impulses. This would also be a robust topological quantum computer.