Text Size

Oct 31

## Meaning of Einstein's General Relativity of Gravity

Posted by: JackSarfatti |
Tagged in: Untagged
Gerry is correct.

The physical content of relativity is how detectors compare their measurements of the same events. This is inherently classical without Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. This is why quantum gravity is so difficult.

1905 SR is for GIF flat global space-time geodesic inertial zero g-force detectors. You can extend it with the Christoffel symbols to represent arbitrarily global accelerating detectors GNIFs. The covariant self-curl of the Christoffel symbols always vanish in that case.

The analogy to U1 EM is A =/= 0 with F = dA = 0.

With 1916 GR the detectors must be locally momentarily coincident. Global G is now local L.

LNIF <===> LIF  are the tetrads

LIF <===> LIF' are the local Lorentz transformations

LNIF <====> LNIF' are the GCT general coordinate transformations.

In all cases the name of the game is to compute local frame invariants like

ds^2 = guv(LNIF)dx^udx^v = nIJ(LIF)dx^Idx^J

R = Ru^u(LNIF) = RI^I(LIF) = Ru^u(LNIF') = RI^I(LIF')

etc.

On Oct 31, 2011, at 04:29 PM, GNPellegrini@aol.com wrote:

Yes, you can "just treat it as just another geometric model for an underlying physical
theory".  As a matter of fact that's all you can do with it.
The point I'm making is that the observer-experimenter is free to choose any system of description he wants, so long as it uniquely represents individual events.  What's to stop him?  However, this arbitrary choice cannot contain within it the outcome of experiments.
In a message dated 10/31/2011 7:19:11 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, iksnileiz@gmail.com writes:
One can construct geometric models for all kinds of theories. Whenever you have an algebraic relationship like

s^2 = a^2 + b^2 + c^2

you can model it in terms of 3D Euclidean metric -- even if it has nothing to do with geometry at all.

Same a relationship like

s^2 = a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + d^2

in relation to 4D Euclidean geometry.

If we apply the same reasoning to the "semi-Euclidean"

s^2 = a^2 + b^2 + c^2 - d^2,

why need relativity theory be any different? Can't we just treat it as just another geometric model for an underlying physical
theory?

On 10/31/2011 4:10 PM, GNPellegrini@aol.comwrote:
I think the argument that is going on demonstrates what I have come to believe is the fundamental problem with relativity theory itself, especially GR but even SR.
That is: Although a noble goal, geometry all by itself does not contain sufficient information of the physics.  I think this is at the core of your dispute of the physical significance of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the gravitational field.
The geometry of space-time (i.e., an operational system by which the laboratory observer uniquely represents individual events) is quite arbitrarily set up by the observer.  Something else needs to be put in to predict how nature correlates these events.  Classical mechanics of LaGrange had the correct approach.  He wrote the laws of physics for any "space-time" (i.e., the "space-time" did not contain the physics)!  I think this was Einstein's over-simplistic error.  I know most physicists do not want to consider this, but why not?  If relativity theory cannot survive the scrutiny it needs to be replaced.
If someone wants to talk about the failures of SR, I will be interested in a discussion.  The background being that the 1913 W-W experiment supposedly confirming SR, does nothing of the sort.
In a message dated 10/31/2011 6:36:47 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, adastra1@mac.com writes:

Nonsense. Ideas evolve. Also I have my doubts about your version of the actual history of Einstein's views on local objective reality. Your basic methodological error is to obsess on early immature ideas of geniuses like Einstein.

No one of any weight in mainstream spacetime physics agrees with you that there is a measureable non-zero third rank GCT tensor hidden inside the torsionless metric connection Levi-Civita Christoffel symbols.

Your invoking of the Levi-Civita theorem is completely irrelevant in my opinion.

On Oct 31, 2011, at 01:37 PM, Paul Zielinski <iksnileiz@gmail.com> wrote:

Can't you see that there is a fundamental inconsistency here?

On 10/31/2011 1:36 PM, Paul Zielinski wrote:
If what turned Einstein on at the end of his life were invariants like ds^2, then why wouldn't he be turned on by first
order invariants like the gravitational deformation tensor G^i_jk? And why are you putting up so much resistance to
an objective gravity field represented exclusively by such tensor quantities?

Just doesn't add up Jack, What's wrong with this picture?

On 10/31/2011 1:25 PM, JACK SARFATTI wrote:
Hogwash
I am talking about Einstein's mature views as in his essay in the Schlipp volume. His early ideas are irrelevant here.

On Oct 31, 2011, at 12:29 PM, Paul Murad <ufoguypaul@yahoo.com> wrote:

Jack:

Ya I agree with Paul, you should have known this before!
Shame on you!
Ufoguy....
From: Paul Zielinski <iksnileiz@gmail.com>
To: JACK SARFATTI <sarfatti@pacbell.net>

Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 3:24 PM
Subject: Re: Removal Detail! (Re: Doctor Sarfatti's V6 DARPA-NASA Star Ship paper MindWarp)

On 10/31/2011 11:06 AM, JACK SARFATTI wrote:
Z forgets what turned Einstein on were the frame invariants like ds^2 and any scalar formed from tensors&  spinors - objective local reality - Plato's Forms.

Excuse me Jack but that was not the way it went down. Einstein's version of relativity was not originally based on spacetime geometry at all. That was Minkowski's contribution to relativity theory. Einstein's approach was quite different. There was no invariant spacetime interval in Einstein's 1905 version of relativity.

For a long time Einstein rejected Minkowski's geometric model and its invariant geometric interval "s" as superfluous. It was only after he was unable to develop a relativistic theory of gravity using coordinate frames alone that he finally caved in and adopted Minkowski's geometric model. And even then it took years for him to grasp the physical significance of the interval ds^2 = g_uv dx^udx^v in generally
covariant formulations of GR and SR.

Your Platonistic "forms" above are simply covariant quantities of the kind that were well known in classical physics. In fact the word "tensor" itself came from the theory of solids, with the stress tensor being the paradigm case. The only difference in relativity theory is the use of a 4D geometric model, and the adaptation of spacetime coordinate systems to represent observer reference frames *by convention*.

What is incoherent in the textbook version of GR that you adhere to so religiously is that a single solitary exception is made for the gravitational field, which is represented by a non-tensor quantity, with very dubious physical justification based on Einstein's heuristic "equivalence" argument.

And even Einstein himself essentially admitted (in his 1916 "Über Fr. Kottlers Abhandlung: Einsteins Äquivalenzhypothese und die Gravitation" -- "Reply to Kottler...") that his version of the  equivalence principle was merely a *heuristic device*.

>
> Even QM has unitary frame invariants in a sense.
>
> (a|U*U|b)  =(a|b)
In a sense.

Instead of observer frames in spacetime, we have alternate supposedly mutually exclusive experimental arrangements, which I suppose are analogous to observer frames in SR.

Correct.

The basic idea is the same: the state of the system can be viewed from different experimental "angles", but it's always the same state regardless of how it is viewed. So there is a weak kind of objectivity tied to the use of tensor invariants in various Hilbert spaces (state vectors, and operators representing "observables").

Yes.

Note in contrast, there is no unitary transformation connecting the orthogonal Fock number basis |n>  to the non-orthogonal Glauber coherent state |z>  basis. This is key to my latest idea on signal nonlocality with entanglement.

This holds in any linear space Jack. Of course you need to apply a non-unitary tranformation to go from an orthogonal basis to a non-orthogonal basis. Otherwise you just get another orthogonal basis. Don't read to much into it.

Wrong Z. I did the calculation. Entangle two coherent sender states |z> and |w>  (z & w are in the complex plane) with an ordinary qubit.

The probability to measure say a "1" at the qubit receiver is

modulate (z|w) to get the non-metrical entanglement signal, which can be faster than light, slower than light, or at light speed contingent on free choices of when to encode and when to decode.

This is a strong violation of orthodox quantum mechanics because of the non-unitary map from the incoherent Fock states to the coherent Glauber states.

>
> |n)  is an eigenstate of the Hermitian a*a number operator for a field oscillator
>
> |z)  is an eigenstate of the non-Hermitian a operator.
>
> |z)  in BCS theory is non-perturbative -  sum of an infinity of Feynman diagrams in micro-incoherent normal -->  macro-quantum coherent superconducting ground state in BCS model
>

>
> On Oct 31, 2011, at 10:12 AM, Paul Zielinski wrote:
>
>> And yet Einstein started it all with his observer dependent physical time and his observer
>> dependent gravitational field.
>>
>> On 10/30/2011 7:57 PM, Demo Hassan wrote:
>>> But the existence of
>>> 'reality' being entirely due to human observation really
>>> bugged both Erwin Schrodinger and Albert Einstein.
>>> Can't say I really blame them.

=
Oct 31

## What turned Einstein on ;-)

Posted by: JackSarfatti |
Tagged in: Untagged

Z forgets what turned Einstein on were the frame invariants like ds^2 and any scalar formed from tensors & spinors - objective local reality - Plato's Forms.

Even QM has unitary frame invariants in a sense.

(a|U*U|b) = (a|b)

Note in contrast, there is no unitary transformation connecting the orthogonal Fock number basis |n> to the non-orthogonal Glauber coherent state |z> basis. This is key to my latest idea on signal nonlocality with entanglement.

|n> is an eigenstate of the Hermitian a*a number operator for a field oscillator

|z> is an eigenstate of the non-Hermitian a operator.

|z> in BCS theory is non-perturbative -  sum of an infinity of Feynman diagrams in micro-incoherent normal --> macro-quantum coherent superconducting ground state in BCS model

On Oct 31, 2011, at 10:12 AM, Paul Zielinski wrote:

And yet Einstein started it all with his observer dependent physical time and his observer
dependent gravitational field.

On 10/30/2011 7:57 PM, Demo Hassan wrote:
But the existence of
'reality' being entirely due to human observation really
bugged both Erwin Schrodinger and Albert Einstein.
Can't say I really blame them.

Oct 31

## Thorn Alley's Weird Desk 10-30-11

Posted by: JackSarfatti |
Tagged in: Untagged

Begin forwarded message:

From: Demo Hassan Subject:  (Re: Doctor Sarfatti's V6 DARPA-NASA Star Ship paper MindWarp)
Date: October 30, 2011 7:57:26 PM PDT

[ THE LAST GASP ]

"Everybody understands Mickey Mouse.
A few people understand Herman Hesse.
Hardly anybody understands Einstein.
And nobody understands Emperor Norton."
-- Malaclypse the Younger
http://www.hermetic.com/browe-archive/index.htm
<< http://home.netcom.com/~mthorn/norton01.htm >>

Tesla was scary-brilliant [and namesake of a cool car:
'Einstein Bashing' always seems weird and disingenuous
to me, kind of like neuroscientists bashing Freud
for his quaint ideas about sex, dreams, and psychology.
When you consider that both these guys, Freud and
Einstein, came up in fairly primitive circumstances
relative to today's knowledge, and broke through old
ideologies, beliefs, then managed to absorb the new
ideas of the time, breaking tradition, etc., actually
building a new train of thought and exploration...
To bash them really seems like misguided anger.
So, I was reading Walter Isaacson's
'Einstein: His Life and Universe'
amazon.com/Einstein-Life-Universe-Walter-Isaacson/dp/0743264738
the other day, and in a chapter on Quantum Entanglement
I learned that Erwin Schrodinger and Albert E. were not
huge fans of the emerging quantum mechanics of the day;
although, Schrodinger had less difficulty with non-locality
than Einstein did, (Albert liked an empirical universe that
you could wrap your mind around, not that spooky-action-at-
a-distance dice game of uncertainty and inseparability);
they both teamed up to discredit some of the weirdities of
quantum mechanics, which gave birth to the 'Schrodinger's
Cat' mental experiment. Not being particularly bright, or
well enough read, I always assumed the 'cat experiment' was
somehow meant to reinforce quantum mechanic theories, when
it turns out to be quite the contrary. Albert started it
all with a scenario of gunpowder that would be triggered to
explode dependent upon an atomic doohicky, showing that the
gunpowder could not be simultaneously exploded or non-exploded
pending a viewer's perception of the matter.  Erwin S. then
conceived the famous cat-in-a-box of acid connected to a
trigger mechanism in order to prove the absurdity of a cat
being both dead and alive pending some human's glimpse of the
waveform collapsing reality. And Albert even added a variation
with gunpowder instead of acid, so the cat (and box) cannot
possibly be both exploded and not exploded. This was their
way of dismantling the entire quantum/macro human observer
determining 'reality' scenario, which they thought was pretty
stupid, and anthropocentric to a maniacally egotistic degree,
(i.e. what about the cat's observation, or a flea's or
what-the-hell's 'other'?) But other than that, non-locality
eventually proved to be generally correct, under the premise
that two particles that interact, continue to simultaneously
reflect each other's state as a result of being a 'system'
regardless of so-called distance. But the existence of
'reality' being entirely due to human observation really
bugged both Erwin Schrodinger and Albert Einstein.
Can't say I really blame them.

And as far as Prof. Hawking's  dismissal of traveling
backwards in time due to various grandfather paradoxes
like killing yourself 2 minutes before you step into
the '2 min. time machine' - subjectively, precluding a
shrug and/or a change of mind as outcome, thereby
eliciting all sorts of bizarro 'many-worlds' hypothetical
timeline jumping, consider the: "Equivalent Sets
of Histories and Multiple Quasiclassical Realms"
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9404013

Authors: Murray Gell-Mann,
James B. Hartle (Santa Fe Institute,
Los Alamos, and University of New Mexico)
(Submitted on 8 Apr 1994 (v1),
last revised 5 May 1996 (this version, v3))

Abstract: We consider notions of physical equivalence
of sets of histories in the quantum mechanics of a
closed system. We show first how the same set of
histories can be relabeled in various ways, including
the use of the Heisenberg equations of motion and of
passive transformations of field variables. In the
the usual approximate quantum mechanics of a measured
subsystem, two observables re- presented by different
Hermitian operators are physically distinguished by
the different apparatus used to measure them. In the
quantum mechanics of a closed system, however, any
apparatus is part of the system and the notion of
physically distinct situations has a different
character. We show that a triple consisting of an
initial condition, a Hamiltonian, and a set of
histories is physically equivalent to another triple
if the operators representing these initial
conditions, Hamiltonians, and histories are related
by any fixed unitary transformation. We apply this
result to the question of whether the universe might
exhibit physically inequivalent quasiclassical realms
(which we earlier called quasiclassical domains), not
just the one that includes familiar experience.
We describe how the probabilities of alternative
forms, behaviors, and evolutionary histories of
information gathering and utilizing systems (IGUSes)
using the usual quasiclassical realm could in
principle be calculated in quantum cosmology, although
it is, of course, impractical to perform the
computations. We discuss how, in principle, the
probabilities of occurence of IGUSes could be
calculated in realms distinct from the usual
quasiclassical one. We discuss how IGUSes adapted
mainly to two different realms could draw inferences
about each other using a hybrid realm consisting of
alternatives drawn from each.
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9404013

|||||||||||

LHC NEWS http://lhc.web.cern.ch/lhc/News.htm

(( MEANWHILE... [Circa: June 2010]... ))

Prof. Hawking most recently said that
Time Travel was only possible to the
future, because Time Travel to
the past is fraught with paradox.
He used the example of a man who
builds a time machine that takes him
back in time 2 minutes before he
'steps into the time machine.' If he
subsequently 'prevents' the man that
is his 'past self' from stepping into
the time machine, then the man who does
the time traveling cannot possibly
exist to perform this action. Paradox.
time travel to the past is impossible,
time travel to the future is easily done.
Simply approach the speed of light, and
as your clocks slow down, relative to the
outside, the reality outside speeds up.
Balance is compensated with relativity
in space-time. To be fair, Prof. Hawking
did not mention the notion of parallel
realities and bifurcating timelines.
The 'Parallel Universe' theory is the only
theory that allows time travel to the past,
but the illusion of 'past' time travel
is compensated for by leaving the timeline
entirely; so, technically, the past is
an illusion, merely another parallel
reality not within the timeline in which
you started. In other words, the only way
to travel backwards is to jump onto an
entirely different timeline which creates
the illusion of traveling backwards.
The arrow of time is not violated, and
you lose track of your original timeline,
existing thereafter in a parallel, seemingly
'past' timeline (assuming the reality isn't
completely divergent!)  At its core, 'time'
really is illusory. Einstein said it
didn't really exist, but was a human
cognitive construct. All we ever really
know is now. We can only travel in the now,
creating various illusions along the way.

[SEE: 'Into The Universe with Stephen Hawking'
http://dsc.discovery.com/tv/stephen-hawking/ ]

I guess that wonderful notion of 'us'
jumping into a time machine to take a
look at what Ezekiel saw way back when
and realizing he saw us in our time
machine, was really less about going
backwards and more about going SIDEWAYS
onto a parallel track where a parallel
Ezekiel existed contemporaneously with
'us.' Hmmmm...  Quoting Saul Paul Sirag:

"There's been some speculation that the
Ezekiel vision was of what we today would
call a flying saucer. In other words, an
It's hard to know one way or another,
but I've been wondering if it was not
a time machine of some sort. Recently
in Physical Review Abstracts (D 15 March
1974) there was a report [by Frank Tipler]
of the possibility of time travel by means
of a rotating cylinder. It would be odd
if we were to go in such a time machine
to visit Ezekiel's time and place.
We could do this, because we know the
day he saw his vision, since he carefully
recorded the time (a date equivalent to
July 5, 592 BCE give or take a day) and
place. It would be odd if in doing
this -- to have a peek at Ezekiel's
vision it turned out that what Ezekiel
saw was just us in our time machine
trying to have a peek at his vision."
-- Saul-Paul Sirag (May 1974)

So, in a Multiverse, given a near infinite number
of earths, (and Ezekiels), e.g. Earth Prime,
Earth^2, Earth^3, Earth^4... all at various
waveform manifestations with separate timelines,
we could conceivably convince ourselves of all
sorts of possibilities as they might apply to the
illusory nature of time travel. Perhaps we'll
figure this all out, in time...? AND...

Yes...
The curiosity of 'entropy,' light speed, time dilation,
etc., according to relativity, quite proven by GPS
satellite's onboard clocks slightly out of phase with
earth surface clocks, and myriad's of other cosmological,
quantum mechanical anti-intuitive shenanigans, verified;
time travel, apparently is limited to future travel
only... Curiouser and curiouser, however, the speed of
light is, yea verily, limited to approx. 186,000 miles
per second in 'SPACE' - lovely inflating invisible space,
created, it seems, following the inflationary big bang
dohicky, inflating, by the way, FASTER than the speed of
light! Is that not interesting?  That space itself may
expand faster than the speed of light, while the light
within the superluminal inflation of space maintains
its photonic speed limit!  Therefore, if one could
perhaps circumvent 'space,' one could circumvent the
speed of light?  Definitely not a technology for
beginner fire apes. Seeya 'round the mountain!
"When She Comes...
She'll be Riding 6 White Horses,
She'll be Riding 6 White Horses,
She'll be Riding 6 White Horses,
"When She Comes... "
Which reminds me of the blood curdling gargoyles
stationed at the portal to the pylons of the Temple
of Cool Stuff specifically designed to occupy and
derange the minds of barely evolved primates in search
of specificity and shiny things. It gives them
something to gnash their teeth and shiver their timbers
over on the way toward enlightenment and non attachment
to such things as temples, gargoyles, monkeys, horse-
power, artificial intelligence, hyper-conspiratorial
gyrations of an anti-critical thinking mode, and other
amusements of a lucidly dreaming collective.
Then again... Never mind.

22|JUNE|2010 CE | 4:08 AM | Earth Prime?

|||||||||||

*************************************************************
Philip Kindred Dick (December 16, 1928 - March 2, 1982)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_K._Dick
*************************************************************

Philip K. Dick's Reality by Tessa Dick
http://tinyurl.com/48pozq

(Tessa Dick was the late science fiction writer
Philip K. Dick's 4th wife. Dick's most famous
book is probably "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?"
published in 1968, which was made into the film

One of the last substantial conversations that I had
with my husband Philip K. Dick entailed a synopsis of
all the speculation in which Phil had engaged since his
visionary experience of 1974, when he saw the world of
ancient Rome superimposed on the landscape of
southern California.

Phil agreed with Plato that we see only the shadows
on the wall of the cave, and not the real objects
which cast those shadows. Those real objects, the
archetypes, stand outside of space and time, but
occasionally they bleed through and some people catch
a glimpse of them. Thus, the Rome that he saw was not,
strictly speaking, the Roman empire of early Christian
times, but an archetype of that kind of reality.

Hints of these philosophical ideas can be found
throughout Phil's writing, even in works from before
he experienced the visions. He always suspected that
we have made some kind of Faustian pact, that we
agreed to live, suffer and die in this illusory world.
Thus, when a character tries to purchase a cola from a
vending machine, he might find himself in an empty
room holding a piece of paper on which the words
"vending machine" are printed. The visitors who came
to Phil showed him alternate histories stacked like
dominoes above our time line, in what he called
"orthogonal time"--a time and space perpendicular to
our own, where we cannot perceive them any more than
the point in Flatland can see the sphere who comes to
visit him. He sees only the circle that appears in his
flat world when the sphere passes through.

Those visitors seemed to be moving chunks of
alternate history and dropping them into our
time line, trying to achieve a result that would
satisfy their goals. They sometimes leave behind
artifacts, which might explain why many ancient
societies which we have labeled "primitive" left
evidence of advanced technology, including electric
light bulbs and flying machines. It would also
explain records of ancient nuclear war, such as
we find in the Vedas.

The time travelers, or time meddlers, sometimes
enter our reality to observe us, and they appeared
quite shocked whenever they realized that Phil
could see them. They did occasionally communicate
with him. They claimed to come from a time that is
neither the past nor the future, but outside of
our time. Phil most often thought that they were
humans, not aliens, but genetically altered in
some way. He felt that they wanted to help us
avoid some global disaster that happened in the
1970s and which negatively affected their world.

The longer I live, the more I see that this world
is not quite real. To some extent, we have distanced
ourselves from reality with our technology, but the
illusory quality goes deeper than that. Some things
simply do not make sense. The next time you say,
"This can't be happening" or "I don't believe it,"
you just might be right.
*************************************************************

"The Religious Experience of Philip K. Dick"
by R. Crumb: http://tinyurl.com/PKD-by-R-CRUMB

*************************************************************

(((((((((((O)))))))))))           ... of cosmic expansion, Einstein, holographic cosmos, instantaneous action at a distance, ad nauseum!  Think not of our beloved Czar of Back Action Timeline Engineering as the chief science officer aboard the Dark Star, but, rather, as an eccentric Lovecraftian uncle living in the attic who madly scrawls
out endless arcane equations, the chanting of which in the appropriate order opens vast rifts in the space/time continuum, allowing the return of THE OLD ONES, with
whom we may interface over tea and scones.

Why?
That is:
Somewhere along the line, the genie in
the bottle stops asking questions, stops
the images from the bottle's inside
reflective surface to account for all
manner of external phenomena, which the
genie summarily delineates with the
internal play of self-reflecting imagery;
hence, dismissing in one fell swoop the
disturbing possibility that there is in
fact something actually existing
external to the mirror-generated self.

What manner of weirdity would cause
such a state?

<< http://home.netcom.com/~mthorn/dmtroom9.htm >>

(((((((((((O)))))))))))           P.S.     Please accept my apology on behalf of my crazy
cohorts and I, for getting a little carried away with
the whole email thing.  It won't happen again.
You know, [weeks ago], I happened to catch the OCCUPIED
wherein s/he [it] hosted various representatives directly
involved with the Moist Rocky Planetoids Exhibit; and
listening to the 3-way trialogues -- a psychological
ideological tug-of-war between the three unique
perspectives involved -- it rapidly became apparent,
the microcosmic struggle over something as seemingly
inane as an Unholy Trinity Consortium, and the horrific
macrocosmic struggle of the generations old Third Planet
Posturing Nightmare, that the only true genuine hope in
all of this is probably people like you.  Therefore,
please accept my (our) naive, humble encouragement to
you to always remain positive and open to all
possibilities, for as long as you are able to exhibit
the peaceful beauty of your spirit, and those you share
your struggle with, you will certainly succeed at
whatever you seek.  Maybe not today, or the day after
in this sad whirling world, one day for sure.
Take care, and all the best!
-- G00G00 GJ00B  [ 3O|OCT|2OII ] (DONE!)

(((((((((((O)))))))))))           JACK SARFATTI wrote:
-----0rigami Massage-----
| Subject: My SLAC Stanford University American Physical |          Society talk on signal non locality on 11-11-11
| From: JACK SARFATTI | Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 13:27:01 -0700
| To: JACK SARFATTI Session C1: AMO & HEP Theory

4:00 PM--5:24 PM, Friday, November 11, 2011
Bldg 48 - ROB Room: Redwood A/B
Chair: Virginia Trimble, University of California, Irvine

Abstract: C1.00002 : Is entanglement signaling really impossible?

4:12 PM--4:24 PM
Preview Abstract
Author:
Jack Sarfatti
(ISEP)

Quantum information theory is based on the premise that entanglement cannot be used as a stand-alone communication channel without a classical signal key decoder. The proof depends on linearity of observables, orthogonal base states, and unitary time evolution between measurements of the Schrodinger equation in configuration space. Spontaneous symmetry breakdown giving a Higgs-Goldstone condensate macro-quantum coherent Glauber ground state has a nonlinear non-unitary Landau-Ginzburg equation in ordinary physical space. The Glauber coherent states are non-orthogonal. The conditions for no-entanglement signaling are not satisfied in this case and it may mean the need for a generalized quantum theory that is to orthodox quantum theory as general relativity is to special relativity.

News Science

Quantum keys let submarines talk securely as Sarfatti predicted 30 years ago.

See David Kaiser's account of the Chickering letter in "How the Hippies Saved Physics" before the mainstream physics community even had a clue about this.

"Submarines must be able to talk securely with remote naval bases while remaining submerged. Could quantum communications allow them to pull off this technically challenging feat?

Submarines employ random "keys" known as one-time pads to encrypt messages. Each key can only be used once, making it impossible for eavesdroppers to crack the code.

One problem with this is that the key must be securely agreed before the submarine leaves base. There is a risk involved in having many keys on board, in case the sub is captured and they fall into hostile hands.

The other problem is that submarines receive messages using low-frequency radio waves that can penetrate water, but only a few characters per second can be transmitted at these frequencies. To receive high frequencies, which can boost the data rate, submarines have to surface and risk detection.

'You want the submarine to be undetectable for as long as possible - we're talking about several weeks," says Marco Lanzagorta, director of quantum technologies at US defense firm ITT.'

He suggests that a technique called quantum key distribution (QKD) could solve these problems. It uses the quantum properties of photons, which are polarised in two different ways to encode 0s and 1s, to generate and exchange a key. Any attempt to intercept the photons disturbs these properties and raises the alarm."

Written by :
Kim Burrafato
Copyright (c) 2010 Stardrive.org On Oct 30, 2011, at 12:28 AM, JACK SARFATTI wrote:

From Werner Von Braun's V2 to my V6 ;-)

On Oct 30, 2011, at 12:03 AM, Mark Thornally wrote:
__________

Are Low Power Warp Drive and Retrocausal
Quantum Entanglement Interstellar Space
Command Control Communication Possible?

Jack Sarfatti
ISEP
San Francisco, CA 94133

Abstract

I propose two plausibly practical near-term
profound super-technology game-changers for
the DARPA-NASA 100 Year Starship Project.
They would allow C^3 from the Pentagon/Langley
in present real time of far interstellar,
intergalactic and even interworld drone and
human missions throughout the conjectured
multiverse string theory landscape of parallel
universes -- if the multiverse exists.
All conventional forms of spacecraft propulsion
are unlikely to motivate largescale private
capital because the Einstein time dilations
for interstellar travels even to the nearest
exo-planet are simply too long for practical
profitable commerce. The long-term
living-in-space habitat problems are likely
to be too difficult. The cost in our declining
world economy seemingly on the brink of
financial if not environmental collapse in 2011
appear to be too great. However, recent
discoveries in the slowing of the speed of
light in Bose-Einstein condensates and the
negative electric permittivity and magnetic
metamaterials suggests a low power speculative
possibility for warp drive based on Einstein's
orthodox field equation for gravity coupled to
the longitudinal non-propagating electromagnetic
near field. Suppose, for example, that we can
slow down the speed of light...
[...]
...This would break the space-time stiffness
barrier to low power warp-wormhole technology.
This conjecture is entirely new and needs
further investigation. The unitarity and
(sub-quantal hidden-variable thermal equilibrium)
Born probability axioms of quantum theory are
proved to break down in the presence of Higgs-
Goldstone spontaneous symmetry breaking in the
ground states of complex systems. This permits
stand-alone, possibly back-from-the future
(retrocausal) nonlocal entanglement signals
for instant interstellar space communications
without light speed retarded time delayed keys
to unlock the messages. This is a violation of
the no-entanglement signal theorem of special
orthodox microquantum theory by a more general
macro-quantum coherent post-quantum theory
similar to the violation of global special
relativity by local general relativity where
the former is a limiting case of the latter.
Nobel prize laureate P.W. Anderson calls this
kind of emergence of new higher-level order
"More is different."

Keywords: warp drive, wormholes,
metamaterials, dark energy, slow light,
future event horizon, past particle horizon,
multiverse, Arrow of Time, hologram universe,
quantum entanglement, signal nonlocality,
rapid space communications
[...]
Thanks to Paul Murad and Professor
James Woodward for useful suggestions
and to Dr. Ronald Pandolfi, Directorate
Science and Technology CIA, for inviting
me to the June, 2008 JASON meeting on
Chinese and US research in high frequency
in La Jolla, California where I learned
about the Navy's keen interest in
metamaterials. This meeting
triggered the current paper. V6 DARPA-NASA Star Ship paper
http://tinyurl.com/SarfattiV6

http://tinyurl.com/Sarfatti-God-and-Tamara

-=[[ NOTE: Dr Tamara Davis's Ph.D. dissertation available online from her home page. Fundamental Aspects of the Expansion
of the Universe and Cosmic Horizons: UNSW Ph.D. Thesis 2004.
EYES ON THE STARS, PRIZE IN HER HANDS
http://tinyurl.com/2006-TAMARA ]]=-

How the Hippies Saved Physics by David Kaiser
http://www.hippiessavedphysics.com/

How The Hippies Saved Physics

(((((((((((O)))))))))))           __________________________________________________

SCALAR 1990 --   [Excerpt]
[...]

"They took manufacturing skills to incredible heights, devoid of all restraint, possessing the fundamental secrets to matter and energy, and apparently willing and able to utilize those secrets.  Within this bold realm, however, resides a nightmarish quality, in so far as their method of development and motivation. Some tremendously horrific distortions manifest there. For example, the planet's sentient inhabitants were structured in a rigidly controlled hierarchy, with an ethical system unrecognizable from what we value: uncaring, cold, indifferent to personal freedoms; everything and everyone served the arcane purpose of the all-controlling 'complex,' and the 'complex' used everyone mercilessly."
[...]

"...and there was something really odd about these people. It was as if their minds were exclusively utilitarian in nature. Nothing superfluous to the task at hand, as if the pleasure centers of their brains were nonexistent, or evolved a subordinate function in relation to this enormous structure..." [...]
http://home.netcom.com/~mthorn/quetzal5.htm

Oct 30

## My SLAC Stanford APS talk 11-11-11

Posted by: JackSarfatti |
Tagged in: Untagged

### Session C1: AMO & HEP Theory

4:00 PM–5:24 PM, Friday, November 11, 2011
Bldg 48 - ROB Room: Redwood A/B

Chair: Virginia Trimble, University of California, Irvine

### Abstract: C1.00002 : Is entanglement signaling really impossible?

4:12 PM–4:24 PM

Preview Abstract

#### Author:

Jack Sarfatti
(ISEP)

Quantum information theory is based on the premise that entanglement cannot be used as a stand-alone communication channel without a classical signal key decoder. The proof depends on linearity of observables, orthogonal base states, and unitary time evolution between measurements of the Schrodinger equation in configuration space. Spontaneous symmetry breakdown giving a Higgs-Goldstone condensate macro-quantum coherent Glauber ground state has a nonlinear non-unitary Landau-Ginzburg equation in ordinary physical space. The Glauber coherent states are non-orthogonal. The conditions for no-entanglement signaling are not satisfied in this case and it may mean the need for a generalized quantum theory that is to orthodox quantum theory as general relativity is to special relativity.

Oct 30

## Low Power Warp-Wormhole Tech & Entanglement Signals

Posted by: JackSarfatti |
Tagged in: Untagged

Thorn Alley wrote:

Get the 22 page PDF at:
http://tinyurl.com/SarfattiV6
____________________________________

Are Low Power Warp Drive and Retrocausal
Quantum Entanglement Interstellar Space
Command Control Communication Possible?

Jack Sarfatti
ISEP
San Francisco, CA 94133

Abstract

I propose two plausibly practical near-term
profound super-technology game-changers for
the DARPA-NASA 100 Year Starship Project.
They would allow C^3 from the Pentagon/Langley
in present real time of far interstellar,
intergalactic and even interworld drone and
human missions throughout the conjectured
multiverse string theory landscape of parallel
universes -- if the multiverse exists.
All conventional forms of spacecraft propulsion
are unlikely to motivate largescale private
capital because the Einstein time dilations
for interstellar travels even to the nearest
exo-planet are simply too long for practical
profitable commerce. The long-term
living-in-space habitat problems are likely
to be too difficult. The cost in our declining
world economy seemingly on the brink of
financial if not environmental collapse in 2011
appear to be too great. However, recent
discoveries in the slowing of the speed of
light in Bose-Einstein condensates and the
negative electric permittivity and magnetic
metamaterials suggests a low power speculative
possibility for warp drive based on Einstein's
orthodox field equation for gravity coupled to
the longitudinal non-propagating electromagnetic
near field. Suppose, for example, that we can
slow down the speed of light...
[...]
...This would break the space-time stiffness
barrier to low power warp-wormhole technology.
This conjecture is entirely new and needs
further investigation. The unitarity and
(sub-quantal hidden-variable thermal equilibrium)
Born probability axioms of quantum theory are
proved to break down in the presence of Higgs-
Goldstone spontaneous symmetry breaking in the
ground states of complex systems. This permits
stand-alone, possibly back-from-the future
(retrocausal) nonlocal entanglement signals
for instant interstellar space communications
without light speed retarded time delayed keys
to unlock the messages. This is a violation of
the no-entanglement signal theorem of special
orthodox microquantum theory by a more general
macro-quantum coherent post-quantum theory
similar to the violation of global special
relativity by local general relativity where
the former is a limiting case of the latter.
Nobel prize laureate P.W. Anderson calls this
kind of emergence of new higher-level order
"More is different."

Keywords: warp drive, wormholes,
metamaterials, dark energy, slow light,
future event horizon, past particle horizon,
multiverse, Arrow of Time, hologram universe,
quantum entanglement, signal nonlocality,
rapid space communications
[...]
Thanks to Paul Murad and Professor
James Woodward for useful suggestions
and to Dr. Ronald Pandolfi, Directorate
Science and Technology CIA, for inviting
me to the June, 2008 JASON meeting on
Chinese and US research in high frequency
in La Jolla, California where I learned
about the Navy's keen interest in
metamaterials. This meeting
triggered the current paper.

http://tinyurl.com/SarfattiV6

Oct 30

## Thorn Alley's Cosmological Cunundrum

Posted by: JackSarfatti |
Tagged in: Untagged

Begin forwarded message:

From: Jonathan Post <jvospost3@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Doctor Sarfatti's V6 DARPA-NASA Star Ship paper MindWarp
Date: October 29, 2011 6:56:02 PM PDT
To: MT <mthorn@ix.netcom.com>

There were no galaxies nor stars during Inflation. Only perturbations
which, even after flattening out, supposedly became higher density
regions which attracted sufficient matter and dark matter to
eventually become galaxies or supergalaxies.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inflation_%28cosmology%29

In physical cosmology, cosmic inflation, cosmological inflation or
just inflation is the theorized extremely rapid exponential expansion
of the early universe by a factor of at least 10^78 in volume, driven
by a negative-pressure vacuum energy density. [Liddle and Lyth (2000)
and Mukhanov (2005) are recent cosmology text books with extensive
discussions of inflation. Kolb and Turner (1988) and Linde (1990) miss
some recent developments, but are still widely used. Peebles (1993)
provides a technical discussion with historical context. Recent review
articles are Lyth and Riotto (1999) and Linde (2005). Guth (1997) and
Hawking (1998) give popular introductions to inflation with historical
remarks.] The inflationary epoch comprises the first part of the
electroweak epoch following the grand unification epoch. It lasted
from 10-36 seconds after the Big Bang to sometime between 10^-33 and
10^-32 seconds. Following the inflationary period, the universe
continues to expand.

The term "inflation" is also used to refer to the hypothesis that
inflation occurred, to the theory of inflation, or to the inflationary
epoch. The inflationary hypothesis was originally proposed in 1980 by
American physicist Alan Guth, who named it "inflation". [Chapter 17 of
Peebles (1993).] It was also proposed by Katsuhiko Sato in 1981.
[Sato, K. (1981). "First-order phase transition of a vacuum and the
expansion of the Universe". Monthly Notices of Royal Astronomical
Society 195: 467]

On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 6:35 PM, MT <mthorn@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
--- A R005T3R CR0W3D:

I have an unrelated really
stooopid question; quoting the site:
<< http://www.calphysics.org/zpe.html >>
'Calphysics Institute: Introduction
to Zero-Point Energy' [...]
"Zero-point energy has the desired
property of driving an accelerated
expansion, and thus having the
requisite properties of dark energy,
but to an absurdly greater degree
than required, i.e. 120 orders
of magnitude." [...] Close quote.
<< http://www.calphysics.org/zpe.html >>
So my really stooopid question is:
If the universe is growing via a 'Zero
Point Energy Accelerated Expansion,'
euphemistically identified as 'Dark Energy'
(or maybe not), and using the analogy of
cooking bread dough with raisins, with the
raisins representing galaxies which do not
expand in the ever expanding bread/space
region of increasing distances, is it, then,
the quantum forces alone that prevent the
accelerated expansion of EVERYTHING, and
what was ZPE and/or Dark Energy 'doing' in
the infancy of this particular universe,
and what, if any, factors come into play
regarding the aforementioned stooopid
question when measuring Stellar Parallax?

**************************************

Dr Jack Sarfatti's V6 DARPA-NASA
Star Ship paper [Excerpt] :::
http://tinyurl.com/SarfattiV6

[...]  The cosmological constant
is proportional to the observed
dark energy density accelerating
the expansion speed of 3D space
in our observable piece of the
multiverse. It is also the
inverse area-entropy of the
observer-dependent pixelated
future cosmological de Sitter
event horizon that Seth Lloyd
of MIT thinks is a possibly vast
quantum computer. In the world
hologram hypothesis, we have two
hologram screens: our past
particle horizon that is the
future light cone of the Alpha
moment of inflation and our
future de Sitter event horizon
that is the past light cone of
the Omega Point (finite conformal
time corresponding to infinite
metric proper time). [...]

http://tinyurl.com/SarfattiV6

2. Warp Drive and Cosmological
Dark Energy

The key point for warp drive is
repulsive antigravity like the
cosmological dark energy
accelerating the expansion rate
of the observable universe, that
Einstein's field equation (1.1)
together with WMAP and Type 1a
supernovae z data say, is
sandwiched between the past
Friedman-Walker-Robertson
particle horizon and the future
de Sitter event horizon. The
observer-dependent past particle
horizon is the future light cone
of the moment of inflation whose
released energy made the hot Big
Bang. The future event horizon is
the past light cone of the
observer's world line that is
imaginatively stretched to infinite
metric proper time, which
corresponds to a finite conformal
clock time. The observer approaches
its future event horizon and
recedes from its past particle
horizon as shown in Figs 1.1 and
5.1 of Tamara Davis's Ph.D.

dissertation [4] available
-=[[ NOTE: Fundamental Aspects
of the Expansion of the Universe
and Cosmic Horizons: UNSW Ph.D.
Thesis 2004.
Fig. 5.1 explains the Arrow of Time
within the world hologram hypothesis,
i.e., why irreversible aging occurs
as the universe's expansion
accelerates. The fundamental
organizing principle is that the
total entropy of the observable
universe is the increasing area of
both cosmological horizons past and
future. This entropy/area starts at
the moment of inflation at one BIT
and rather quickly saturates at
de Sitter dark energy acceleration
of the observable part of the
universe outstrips the speed of
light. Both past and future horizons
are conjectured to be holographic
computer screens [5] encoding
information in pixels of quantized
area one fourth Planck area
according to the Bekenstein-Hawking
area-entropy equation. [6]
The strong hologram conjecture is
that all the bulk matter fields
are 3D image projections of 2D
anyonic conformal topological
quantum field theory [7] processes
on both the past and future
cosmological horizons. Indeed, the
number of 2D pixels on the
cosmological horizons is in 1-1
correspondence with the number
of 3D voxels in the interior of
the horizons on spacelike slices
of constant CMB temperature." [...]

http://tinyurl.com/SarfattiV6
**************************************

-=[[ NOTE: "Electric Permittivity" -
In electromagnetism, absolute
permittivity is the measure of the
resistance that is encountered when
forming an electric field in a
medium. In other words, permittivity
is a measure of how an electric
field affects, and is affected by,
a dielectric medium. The permittivity
of a medium describes how much
electric field (more correctly, flux)
is 'generated' per unit charge.
Less electric flux exists in a medium
with a high permittivity (per unit
charge) due to polarization effects.
Permittivity is directly related to
electric susceptibility, which is a
measure of how easily a dielectric
polarizes in response to an electric
field. Thus, permittivity relates to
a material's ability to transmit
(or "permit") an electric field. [...]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permittivity ]]=-

Tamara Davis once wrote:

"For the first part of my PhD thesis
I explored the meaning of the expansion
of the universe and attempted to debunk
learn how galaxies can recede faster
than the speed of light without violating
special relativity, how event horizons
form in an accelerating universe so our
observable universe resembles [an] inverted
black hole, how light travelling in our
direction can be dragged away from us by
the expansion of space, and how many of
the galaxies we observe in pictures such
as the Hubble Deep Field are already beyond
our event horizon so that we can never
communicate with them." -=[[ NOTE:
http://tinyurl.com/Sarfatti-God-and-Tamara ]]=-

NEWS Article in University
of New South Wales:
EYES ON THE STARS, PRIZE IN HER HANDS
-=[[ NOTE: http://tinyurl.com/2006-TAMARA ]]=-

Tamara Davis

With so many other talented students
competing for it, Dr Tamara Davis was
"stunned" when she heard that she'd won
the UNSW U Committee Award for Research
Excellence in Science.
The coveted award of $10,000 is given annually to a science student judged to have submitted the best PhD thesis within a calendar year. "When I first heard I was stunned -- I couldn't believe that I had won," says Dr Davis, who in December 2005 accepted a post-doctoral position at Dark Universe Centre of the University of Copenhagen. "I've won plenty of small things before, but the prize of$10,000 that came with
this award gives it a weight unlike
"I really did not expect to win, because
UNSW churns out so many great PhDs each
year, and it is difficult to believe that
my research could have been the best."
The selection committee noted that
Dr Davis's doctoral thesis -- Fundamental
Aspects of the Expansion of the Universe
and Cosmic Horizons -- addressed the topic
with "originality, authority and clarity,
to the extent that her work has been
published in both prestigious journals,
Nature and Scientific American".
Her thesis covered many fundamental issues
about the expansion of the universe.

- is there a limit to how far can we see?
- do the fundamental constants of
nature vary?
- what happens to the event-horizons of
black holes in an expanding universe?

Is there an unknown type of energy or are
the laws of gravity wrong? -- "I'd like
to figure out which."

"The Centre for Dark Energy has a brief
to investigate the role that 'dark energy'
plays in the rapid expansion of the
universe," says Dr Davis.
"This is something that was discovered
only seven years ago. We knew the universe
was expanding, but had always assumed that
the expansion was slowing down because
of gravity.
"Nothing in our conventional physics
can cause the expansion to accelerate.
So either there is a new type of matter
or energy that was previously unknown, or
the laws of gravity are wrong -- and I'd
like to figure out which."
Dr Davis has three degrees from
UNSW -- a bachelor's degree in Science
(physics), a bachelor's degree in Arts
(philosophy) and a PhD in Astrophysics.
Before her recent appointment in Denmark,
Dr Davis worked at the Australian National
University's Mount Stromlo Observatory,
consulting for the Lawrence Berkeley
National Laboratory in the US on the
design of a new space telescope for
telescope for the U.S. Department of
Energy and NASA.
Her success isn't limited to academia.
As a UNSW student she competed at the
Australian University Games in four
sports (skiing, swimming, water polo
and Ultimate frisbee), collecting medals
in three of them. She was president of
the Ultimate frisbee club, served on the
Sports Association Executive and won the
Sam Cracknell scholarship for sport.
She was also awarded a UNSW Blue, the
highest honour the university can
bestow for achievement in sport, and
was a state medallist in gymnastics
and surf lifesaving.
While completing her PhD she represented
Australia in two World Championships for
Ultimate Frisbee.
-=[[ NOTE: UNSW: http://tinyurl.com/2006-TAMARA

Dr Jack Sarfatti's V6 DARPA-NASA
Star Ship paper [Excerpt] :::
http://tinyurl.com/SarfattiV6

**************************************

Thorn Alley wrote:

V6 DARPA-NASA Star Ship paper
http://tinyurl.com/SarfattiV6

I look forward to the day when a
parallel timeline produces an artificial
intelligence derived from a JACK SARFATTI
duplicate event horizon stationed in a low
planetary orbit housed in a superluminal
propellantless communications vehicle that
manages to thread a tunnel across relevent
temporal bifurcations expediting a link to
a circa 1950's Earth timeline where a call
is placed to Flatbush New York to a young
Jack Sarfatti whose mind is subsequently
blown and the rest is high strangeness
negative entropy whoopee math history!
http://home.netcom.com/~mthorn/history9.htm

<> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
<> A Physicist Explains Why Parallel Universes
<> May Exist:  [...]     "But there's a more
<> confounding aspect of quantum theory that
<>   After decades of closely studying quantum
<> mechanics, and after having accumulated a
<> wealth of data confirming its probabilistic
<> predictions, no one has been able to explain
<> why only one of the many possible outcomes
<> in any given situation actually happens.
<>   When we do experiments, when we examine
<> the world, we all agree that we encounter
<> a single definite reality. Yet, more than
<> a century after the quantum revolution
<> began, there is no consensus among the
<> world's physicists as to how this basic
<> fact is compatible with the theory's
<> mathematical expression." [...]
<>
<> Excerpted from 'The Hidden Reality'
<>  by Brian Greene
<>   Copyright 2011 by Brian Greene.
<>    http://www.iscap.columbia.edu

-----0rigami Massage-----
| From: JACK SARFATTI <sarfatti@pacbell.net>
| Subject: CIA, Reagan Admin & Entanglement
|          Signaling 1980's & David Kaiser's
|          book Hippies Saved Physics
| Date: Oct 27, 2011 12:10 PM

On Oct 27, 2011, at 11:46 AM, Paul Murad wrote:

Jack:

Is your entanglement signaling EM or what?

NO! Not necessarily. We can use EM waves,
but need not do so. Any matter field will do.

The math is in my V6 DARPA-NASA Star Ship paper
at the end.

Entanglement signaling uses the macro-quantum
coherent stiff Bohm quantum potential that pilots
the classical EM field for example - not the
classical EM field itself.

Also we can use massive particles, e.g. entangled
quantum dot qubits stored in a solid substrate
on board the starship as the receiver states
entangled with some non-orthogonal Bose-Einstein
condensate sender states back at the Pentagon,
Langley whatever. David Kaiser describes this in
his book "How the Hippies Save Physics" in my
memoranda for CIA & Reagan Admin back in late
1970's and early 1980's - I did not have a scheme
that would work back then - but I think I do now.

And are you entangling without EM?  I bet it is....

This is the point... We need to look at different
types of communications...
Paul...

From: JACK SARFATTI <sarfatti@pacbell.net>
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 2:14 PM
Subject: Re: Moon Square and Pyramid-
Solar System Anomalies

Advanced ETs, IF they exist, do not use
retarded EM waves. They use entanglement
signaling as in V6 final version of my
DARPA Star Ship paper. (unless someone can
point out an error in my recent argument)

-=[[-END-]]=-
***********************************************

In a recent PBS interview, promoting
his upcoming 4-Part NOVA special,
Brian Greene said he did not think the
'faster than light neutrinos' results
will ultimately prove to be accurate.
He also said he doesn't 'believe' in
articulated an interest in exploring
their possibility, citing that many
things we now accept as fact, like
Black Holes, etc., were once
considered farfetched except in
mathematical hypothesis. -- eMpTy
http://home.netcom.com/~mthorn/stargate.htm

============================================

- 'OPERA' - 'Oscillation Project with
Emulsion-tRacking Apparatus'
http://operaweb.lngs.infn.it/

The OPERA experiment has been designed
to perform the most straightforward test of
the phenomenon of neutrino oscillations.
This experiment exploits the CNGS high-intensity
and high-energy beam of muon neutrinos produced
at the CERN SPS in Geneva pointing towards the
LNGS underground laboratory at Gran Sasso,
730 km away in central Italy. OPERA is located
in the Hall C of LNGS and it is aimed at
detecting for the first time the appearance of
tau-neutrinos from the transmutation (oscillation)
of muon-neutrinos during their 3 millisecond
travel from Geneva to Gran Sasso. In OPERA,
tau-leptons resulting from the interaction of
tau-neutrinos will be observed in "bricks" of
photographic emulsion films interleaved with
of such bricks for a total mass of 1300 tons and
is complemented by electronic detectors (trackers
and spectrometers) and ancillary infrastructure.
Its construction has been completed in spring 2008
and the experiment is currently in data taking.
http://operaweb.lngs.infn.it/

23 Sep 2011 -- CERN

OPERA experiment invites
scrutiny of unexpected results
http://www.cern.ch/

Neutrino beams from CERN in Switzerland
are sent over 700km through the Earth's crust
to the laboratory in Italy.

The OPERA experiment, which observes a
neutrino beam from CERN 730 km away at
Italy's INFN Gran Sasso Laboratory, will
present new results in a seminar at
CERN today.

The OPERA result is based on the observation
of over 15000 neutrino events measured at
Gran Sasso, and appears to indicate that the
neutrinos travel at a velocity 20 parts per
million above the speed of light, nature's
cosmic speed limit. Given the potential
far-reaching consequences of such a result,
independent measurements are needed before
the effect can either be refuted or firmly
established. This is why the OPERA
collaboration has decided to open the
http://www.cern.ch/

============================================

Measurement of the neutrino velocity
with the OPERA detector in the CNGS beam
(Submitted on 22 Sep 2011)
http://arxiv.org/abs/1109.4897

Abstract: The OPERA neutrino experiment at
the underground Gran Sasso Laboratory has
measured the velocity of neutrinos from
the CERN CNGS beam over a baseline of about
730 km with much higher accuracy than
previous studies conducted with accelerator
neutrinos. The measurement is based on
high-statistics data taken by OPERA in the
years 2009, 2010 and 2011. Dedicated upgrades
of the CNGS timing system and of the OPERA
detector, as well as a high precision geodesy
campaign for the measurement of the neutrino
baseline, allowed reaching comparable
systematic and statistical accuracies.
An early arrival time of CNGS muon neutrinos
with respect to the one computed assuming the
speed of light in vacuum of (60.7 \pm 6.9
(stat.) \pm 7.4 (sys.)) ns was measured.
This anomaly corresponds to a relative
difference of the muon neutrino velocity
with respect to the speed of light
(v-c)/c = (2.48 \pm 0.28 (stat.) \pm 0.30
(sys.)) \times 10-5.
Subjects:  High Energy Physics -
Experiment (hep-ex)
Cite as:  arXiv:1109.4897v1 [hep-ex]
Submission history
| From: Pasquale Migliozzi Dr.
[v1] Thu, 22 Sep 2011 17:59:33 GMT (4763kb)
http://arxiv.org/abs/1109.4897

============================================

Oct 29

## Mannheim's conformal gravity papers

Posted by: JackSarfatti |
Tagged in: Untagged
1.
Cosmological Perturbations in Conformal Gravity
Subjects: General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc); Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO); High Energy Physics - Theory (hep-th)
2.
Fitting dwarf galaxy rotation curves with conformal gravity
Comments: 19 pages, 37 figures, revtex4. Updated version with 6 new galaxies to bring total in paper to 30 galaxies
Subjects: Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO); General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc); High Energy Physics - Theory (hep-th)
3.
PT symmetry in relativistic quantum mechanics
Subjects: High Energy Physics - Theory (hep-th); Mathematical Physics (math-ph); Quantum Physics (quant-ph)
4.
Making the Case for Conformal Gravity
Comments: 34 pages, 21 figures. Presentation at the International Conference on Two Cosmological Models, Universidad Iberoamericana, Mexico City, November 17-19, 2010. Updated final version, contains many new footnotes. To appear in Foundations of Physics
Subjects: High Energy Physics - Theory (hep-th); Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO); General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc)
5.
Fitting galactic rotation curves with conformal gravity and a global quadratic potential
Comments: revtex4, 47 pages, 114 figures. Two figures added and text expanded
Subjects: Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO); General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc); High Energy Physics - Theory (hep-th)
6.
Impact of a global quadratic potential on galactic rotation curves
Comments: Revtex4, 11 pages, 20 figures. Some minor changes made. Results not affected
Journal-ref: Phys.Rev.Lett.106:121101,2011
Subjects: Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO); General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc); High Energy Physics - Phenomenology (hep-ph); High Energy Physics - Theory (hep-th)
7.
Intrinsically Quantum-Mechanical Gravity and the Cosmological Constant Problem
Comments: 15 pages. Presentation at the International Conference on Two Cosmological Models, Universidad Iberoamericana, Mexico City, November 17-19, 2010. Updated final version, contains many new footnotes, no major changes. To appear in Mod. Phys. Lett. A
Subjects: High Energy Physics - Theory (hep-th); Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO); General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc)
8.
PT symmetry as a necessary and sufficient condition for unitary time evolution
Subjects: High Energy Physics - Theory (hep-th)
9.
Comprehensive Solution to the Cosmological Constant, Zero-Point Energy, and Quantum Gravity Problems
Comments: Final version, to appear in General Relativity and Gravitation (the final publication is available at this http URL). 58 pages, revtex4, some additions to text and some added references
Journal-ref: Gen.Rel.Grav.43:703-750,2011
Subjects: High Energy Physics - Theory (hep-th); General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc)
10.
PT symmetry and necessary and sufficient conditions for the reality of energy eigenvalues
Subjects: High Energy Physics - Theory (hep-th); Mathematical Physics (math-ph); Quantum Physics (quant-ph)
11.
Dynamical symmetry breaking and the cosmological constant problem
Comments: 4 pages. Prepared for the proceedings of 34th International Conference on High Energy Physics (ICHEP 2008), Philadelphia, July 2008. Revised version contains minor changes to incorporate ICHEP08 modified slac.rtx style file
Subjects: High Energy Physics - Theory (hep-th)
12.
Localization Issues for Robertson-Walker Branes
Comments: 18 pages, revtex. Proceedings of "Cosmology and Elementary Particle Physics", Coral Gables Conference, December 2001, B. N. Kursunoglu, S. L. Mintz and A. Perlmutter (Eds.), American Institute of Physics, NY (2002)
Subjects: High Energy Physics - Theory (hep-th)
13.
Giving up the ghost
Comments: 8 pages, o figures; talk given by the first author at the 5th International Symposium on Quantum Theory and Symmetries (QTS5) held in Vallodolid, Spain, July 2007; published in a special issue of the Journal of Physics A, Ed. by M. Gadella, J. M. Izquierdo, S. Kuru, J. Negro, M. del Olmo
Journal-ref: J.Phys.A41:304018,2008
Subjects: High Energy Physics - Theory (hep-th)
14.
Exactly solvable PT-symmetric Hamiltonian having no Hermitian counterpart
Subjects: High Energy Physics - Theory (hep-th)
15.
Conformal Gravity Challenges String Theory
Comments: LaTex, 8 pages. Proceedings write-up of talk presented at PASCOS-07, Imperial College London, July 2007
Subjects: High Energy Physics - Theory (hep-th); General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc)
16.
No-ghost theorem for the fourth-order derivative Pais-Uhlenbeck oscillator model
Journal-ref: Phys.Rev.Lett.100:110402,2008
Subjects: High Energy Physics - Theory (hep-th); General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc); Quantum Physics (quant-ph)
17.
Solution to the ghost problem in fourth order derivative theories
Philip D. Mannheim (University of Connecticut)
Comments: 36 pages, revtex. Prepared for the proceedings of the 2006 Biennial Meeting of the International Association for Relativistic Dynamics Version 2 contains an expanded discussion of the path integral quantization of the Pais-Uhlenbeck fourth order oscillator theory
Journal-ref: Found.Phys.37:532-571,2007
Subjects: High Energy Physics - Theory (hep-th)
18.
Completeness of non-normalizable modes
Philip D. Mannheim, Ionel Simbotin (University of Connecticut)
Comments: 34 pages, 6 figures. Revtex
Journal-ref: J.Phys.A39:13783-13806,2006
Subjects: High Energy Physics - Theory (hep-th)
19.
Causality in the brane world
Philip D. Mannheim (University of Connecticut)
Comments: Latex, 5 pages. Prepared for the Proceedings of the 26th International Colloquium on Group Theoretical Methods in Physics, New York City, June 2006
Subjects: High Energy Physics - Theory (hep-th)
20.
Gauge Invariant Treatment of the Energy Carried by a Gravitational Wave
Philip D. Mannheim (University of Connecticut)
Comments: 13 pages, revtex4. Final version. To appear in Phys. Rev. D
Journal-ref: Phys.Rev. D74 (2006) 024019
Subjects: General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc); Astrophysics (astro-ph); High Energy Physics - Theory (hep-th)
21.
Dirac Quantization of the Pais-Uhlenbeck Fourth Order Oscillator
Philip D. Mannheim (University of Connecticut), Aharon Davidson (Ben Gurion University)
Comments: RevTeX4, 20 pages. Final version, to appear in Phys. Rev. A
Journal-ref: Phys.Rev. A71 (2005) 042110
Subjects: High Energy Physics - Theory (hep-th); General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc)
22.
Delta function singularities in the Weyl tensor at the brane
Philip D. Mannheim (University of Connecticut)
Journal-ref: Phys.Rev. D64 (2001) 068501
Subjects: High Energy Physics - Theory (hep-th)
23.
Constraints on $AdS_5$ Embeddings
Philip D. Mannheim (U. Connecticut and MIT)
Comments: RevTeX, 9 pages (updated version v2, conclusions unchanged after extension to the non-static case)
Journal-ref: Phys.Rev. D64 (2001) 065008
Subjects: High Energy Physics - Theory (hep-th)
24.
Dynamical Localization of Gravity
Aharon Davidson (Ben Gurion), Philip D. Mannheim (U. Connecticut and MIT)
Comments: RevTeX, 9 pages. (updated version v2 with references to prior work, conclusions unchanged)
Subjects: High Energy Physics - Theory (hep-th)
25.
Constraints on Brane-Localized Gravity
Philip D. Mannheim (U. Connecticut and MIT)
Comments: RevTeX, 15 pages (updated version v2, conclusions unchanged)
Journal-ref: Phys.Rev. D63 (2001) 024018
Subjects: High Energy Physics - Theory (hep-th)
Oct 29

## Conformal Gravity Challenge to Dark Energy & Dark Matter Theories

Posted by: JackSarfatti |
Tagged in: Untagged

On Oct 28, 2011, at 12:35 PM, art wagner wrote:

Looks pretty good -   http://xxx.lanl.gov/find/hep-th/1/au:+Mannheim_P/0/1/0/all/0/1

OK, it does look important having read more of the paper. Definitely needs to be considered. Be interested to see what the Top Guns in GR think about it - if they read it.

"With the conformal theory being a consistent and renormalizable quantum theory at the microscopic
level, then just as with electrodynamics, one is assured that its macroscopic classical
predictions are reliable and not destroyed by quantum corrections. Consequently, application of the
theory to macroscopic astrophysical phenomena allows one to test the theory. Early work in this
direction was provided in [8] where the theory was used to successfully fit the rotation curves of a
set of 11 spiral galaxies, with the mass to light ratios (M/L) of the luminous optical disks of each of
the galaxies being the only free parameters, and with no dark matter being required. More recently
a systematic, broad-based study [9, 10, 11] of rotation curves extended the fitting to a total of 133
galaxies (a varied sample consisting of high surface brightness, low surface brightness, and dwarf
galaxies), and again acceptable fitting was obtained with the mass to light ratios of the galactic
optical disks being the only free parameters, and again with no dark matter being required. The
success of conformal gravity in fitting no less than 133 galactic rotation curves with just one free
parameter per galaxy is very encouraging for the theory. And with its not needing to invoke dark
matter, the very success of the fitting calls into question the validity of dark matter theory, where
in addition to the optical disk mass to light ratios, one typically needs two free parameters for each
galactic dark matter halo, and a thus additional 266 free parameters for the 133 galaxy sample.
For cosmological applications, conformal gravity has been found capable of providing a natural
explanation for the accelerating Universe supernovae data [12, 1]. Specifically, in the conformal
theory the background Robertson-Walker (RW) cosmology is found to naturally be an accelerating
one at all redshifts, so that unlike the situation that occurs in the standard cosmology, in the
conformal case there is no need to fine-tune the theory so as to force the Universe to transition from
deceleration to acceleration at a late redshift of order one. The conformal theory thus naturally
addresses the dark energy problem that challenges the standard cosmological theory."

Oct 29

## Weird Desk Memo from Thorn Alley ;-)

Posted by: JackSarfatti |
Tagged in: Untagged

Begin forwarded message:

From: Thorn Alley <thornalley2002@yahoo.co.uk>
Subject: Sarfatti's V6 DARPA-NASA Star Ship paper & GARgantuan GENEtics F0RD
Date: October 28, 2011 4:20:03 PM PDT
To: Brian Greene <greene@phys.columbia.edu>, JACK SARFATTI <sarfatti@pacbell.net>, Paul Murad <ufoguypaul@yahoo.com>,

V6 DARPA-NASA Star Ship paper
http://tinyurl.com/SarfattiV6

I look forward to the day when a
parallel timeline produces an artificial
intelligence derived from a JACK SARFATTI
duplicate event horizon stationed in a low
planetary orbit housed in a superluminal
propellantless communications vehicle that
manages to thread a tunnel across relevent
temporal bifurcations expediting a link to
a circa 1950's Earth timeline where a call
is placed to Flatbush New York to a young
Jack Sarfatti whose mind is subsequently
blown and the rest is high strangeness
negative entropy whoopee math history!

<> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
<> A Physicist Explains Why Parallel Universes
<> May Exist:  [...]     "But there's a more
<> confounding aspect of quantum theory that
<>   After decades of closely studying quantum
<> mechanics, and after having accumulated a
<> wealth of data confirming its probabilistic
<> predictions, no one has been able to explain
<> why only one of the many possible outcomes
<> in any given situation actually happens.
<>   When we do experiments, when we examine
<> the world, we all agree that we encounter
<> a single definite reality. Yet, more than
<> a century after the quantum revolution
<> began, there is no consensus among the
<> world's physicists as to how this basic
<> fact is compatible with the theory's
<> mathematical expression." [...]
<>
<> Excerpted from 'The Hidden Reality'
<>  by Brian Greene
<>   Copyright 2011 by Brian Greene.
<>    http://www.iscap.columbia.edu

-----0rigami Massage-----
| From: JACK SARFATTI <sarfatti@pacbell.net>
| Subject: CIA, Reagan Admin & Entanglement
|          Signaling 1980's & David Kaiser's
|          book Hippies Saved Physics
| Date: Oct 27, 2011 12:10 PM

On Oct 27, 2011, at 11:46 AM, Paul Murad wrote:

Jack:

Is your entanglement signaling EM or what?

NO! Not necessarily. We can use EM waves,
but need not do so. Any matter field will do.

The math is in my V6 DARPA-NASA Star Ship paper
at the end.

Entanglement signaling uses the macro-quantum
coherent stiff Bohm quantum potential that pilots
the classical EM field for example - not the
classical EM field itself.

Also we can use massive particles, e.g. entangled
quantum dot qubits stored in a solid substrate
on board the starship as the receiver states
entangled with some non-orthogonal Bose-Einstein
condensate sender states back at the Pentagon,
Langley whatever. David Kaiser describes this in
his book "How the Hippies Save Physics" in my
memoranda for CIA & Reagan Admin back in late
1970's and early 1980's - I did not have a scheme
that would work back then - but I think I do now.
CIA Chief of Station Harold Chipman was setting
up a think tank for me at USF in mid-80's, but he
was murdered (radiation poisoning by KGB - or so
he thought as he lay dying - payback for his Urals
bio-weapons black op that went awry killing many
Russians earlier).

And are you entangling without EM?  I bet it is....

This is the point... We need to look at different
types of communications...
Paul...

From: JACK SARFATTI <sarfatti@pacbell.net>
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 2:14 PM
Subject: Re: Moon Square and Pyramid-
Solar System Anomalies

Advanced ETs, IF they exist, do not use
retarded EM waves. They use entanglement
signaling as in V6 final version of my
DARPA Star Ship paper. (unless someone can
point out an error in my recent argument)

-=[[-END-]]=-
***********************************************

In a recent PBS interview, promoting
his upcoming 4-Part NOVA special,
Brian Greene said he did not think the
'faster than light neutrinos' results
will ultimately prove to be accurate.
He also said he doesn't 'believe' in
articulated an interest in exploring
their possibility, citing that many
things we now accept as fact, like
Black Holes, etc., were once
considered farfetched except in
mathematical hypothesis. -- eMpTy
http://home.netcom.com/~mthorn/stargate.htm

============================================

- 'OPERA' - 'Oscillation Project with
Emulsion-tRacking Apparatus'
http://operaweb.lngs.infn.it/

The OPERA experiment has been designed
to perform the most straightforward test of
the phenomenon of neutrino oscillations.
This experiment exploits the CNGS high-intensity
and high-energy beam of muon neutrinos produced
at the CERN SPS in Geneva pointing towards the
LNGS underground laboratory at Gran Sasso,
730 km away in central Italy. OPERA is located
in the Hall C of LNGS and it is aimed at
detecting for the first time the appearance of
tau-neutrinos from the transmutation (oscillation)
of muon-neutrinos during their 3 millisecond
travel from Geneva to Gran Sasso. In OPERA,
tau-leptons resulting from the interaction of
tau-neutrinos will be observed in "bricks" of
photographic emulsion films interleaved with
of such bricks for a total mass of 1300 tons and
is complemented by electronic detectors (trackers
and spectrometers) and ancillary infrastructure.
Its construction has been completed in spring 2008
and the experiment is currently in data taking.
http://operaweb.lngs.infn.it/

23 Sep 2011 -- CERN

OPERA experiment invites
scrutiny of unexpected results
http://www.cern.ch/

Neutrino beams from CERN in Switzerland
are sent over 700km through the Earth's crust
to the laboratory in Italy.

The OPERA experiment, which observes a
neutrino beam from CERN 730 km away at
Italy's INFN Gran Sasso Laboratory, will
present new results in a seminar at
CERN today.

The OPERA result is based on the observation
of over 15000 neutrino events measured at
Gran Sasso, and appears to indicate that the
neutrinos travel at a velocity 20 parts per
million above the speed of light, nature's
cosmic speed limit. Given the potential
far-reaching consequences of such a result,
independent measurements are needed before
the effect can either be refuted or firmly
established. This is why the OPERA
collaboration has decided to open the
http://www.cern.ch/

============================================

Measurement of the neutrino velocity
with the OPERA detector in the CNGS beam
(Submitted on 22 Sep 2011)
http://arxiv.org/abs/1109.4897

Abstract: The OPERA neutrino experiment at
the underground Gran Sasso Laboratory has
measured the velocity of neutrinos from
the CERN CNGS beam over a baseline of about
730 km with much higher accuracy than
previous studies conducted with accelerator
neutrinos. The measurement is based on
high-statistics data taken by OPERA in the
years 2009, 2010 and 2011. Dedicated upgrades
of the CNGS timing system and of the OPERA
detector, as well as a high precision geodesy
campaign for the measurement of the neutrino
baseline, allowed reaching comparable
systematic and statistical accuracies.
An early arrival time of CNGS muon neutrinos
with respect to the one computed assuming the
speed of light in vacuum of (60.7 \pm 6.9
(stat.) \pm 7.4 (sys.)) ns was measured.
This anomaly corresponds to a relative
difference of the muon neutrino velocity
with respect to the speed of light
(v-c)/c = (2.48 \pm 0.28 (stat.) \pm 0.30
(sys.)) \times 10-5.
Subjects:  High Energy Physics -
Experiment (hep-ex)
Cite as:  arXiv:1109.4897v1 [hep-ex]
Submission history
| From: Pasquale Migliozzi Dr.
[v1] Thu, 22 Sep 2011 17:59:33 GMT (4763kb)
http://arxiv.org/abs/1109.4897

============================================

-----0rigami Massage-----
| From: Gary G Ford <ggford@shaw.ca>
| To: Millennium <amaterasu@fastmail.com.au>
|
| Subject: Re: 28|0ct|2OII Fwd: Completed Story
|          Re: Sirius Shift, Sirius (Parallax) Disclosure! !!
| Date: Oct 28, 2011 9:58 AM

Greetings Millennium!  Thank you for the insight,
that an alternate method of local star parallax
calculation may give different, and hopefully more
correct, distances to nearby stars!  Not being
an Astronomer of any kind, except a once youthful
star gazer of now damaged eyesight and other problems
of accelerated age, I find now that I have been,
despite my natural inclinations when confronted
intellectual leavings of cloistered, in effect
closed, professional priesthoods, allowing myself
to be deceived over my decades since childhood!

Critical Information Held Back - Secrets of More
Direct and Accurate Understanding - purposeful
half truths ... these are the veneer of secretive
science and all other closely held true knowledge.

Physics - Physicists? - Yes, perhaps we should
not be over critical of these often unfortunate
life-long struggling inductees, who well labored
hard to learn and understand, thus even to
memorize and come to deeply believe all of the
intricate details required to connect deceptively
simplistic seeming steps, outlined by masters of
their subjects, details which less honest and
lazier acolytes would merely feign to have
produced and understood, and of course, as always,
as ultimate conditioning requirement of any cult,
to Believe Without Any Doubts, those Purposely
Left Incomplete Doctrinal Points which they had
mastered, so acquiring, over long progression of
their hard fought education and slow rise
in career, in the Medievally
Formulated, Elite and
Pretentious Fields
OF PHYSICS!

May Vested Interests on High,
Bellow in Pain, that Their
SECRETS are being
LET OUT NOW!

GGF, COSMOS CHILD
"Let Us Sail Upon The Cosmic Seas
And Move Around Too Far In Time!"
http://pw1.netcom.com/~mthorn/divinepr.htm

On 28/10/2011 9:03 AM, Millennium wrote:
thanks for the discussion,
here is the original article, with the
illustrations, which are perhaps 99 percent
of the 'Awakening' ...

Sirius Shift, Sirius (Parallax) Disclosure!
by Millennium Twain on Monday, 24 October
2011 at 13:03

So what is Stellar Parallax, Annual Parallax?

How does it relate to Stellar Distance, the distance
of Alpha Centauri and Sirius in particular?

What is the difference between a distance of
a mere Lightyear, and that of a Parsec?

How does the Covert Institution of Astrophysics
ACTUALLY determine Stellar Distance from Parallax?

And how does that compare to the fluff, disinfo,
they tell the public?

Why does Aerospace & Astrophysics defraud the public?

[...]

antecedents: $IRIUS DI$?LO\$URE, Alpha ...

...  ~~

Millennium Twain

all our institutions are covert, and all are
'tongue-in-cheek' when you are brought up in
them. you will notice the scientific parallax
formula was created with a 'Gauge', factor,
which gives Parsecs (Parallax Seconds!) as
an answer when ArcSeconds are used for the
astrometric measurement angle. my (approximate)
derivation for the Covert Error Factor as of
this month was 2.5, a convergence from the
factor of 2-4 that we have been discussing
the last few years -- thus yielding 1.7
lightyears distance for Alpha Centauri
(with a co-helical trajectory period of
52,000 years) and, again, 3.4 lightyears
for the distance of Sirius (with a co-helical
trajectory period of 104,000 years).

however, if we take the convenience, and
the humour, of 'Father', of 'Big Brother',
of our Corporate-Peer-Society into account;
I strongly suspect that an exact conversion
factor of 3.26 would be the 'Covert Fudge
Factor of Choice'. (1 Parsec = 3.26163626
light years -- which is to say that the
'Parsec' star distance figures used in
all the publications of the Covert
Astronomical and Astrophysical institutions
are only meant to be read as Parsecs by the
slaves, the cattle, the consumers, the public.
the Aero/Astro institution, and their
managers, would all read them, know them,
however as Lightyears!)

--
amaterasu@fastmail.com.au
--
http://www.fastmail.fm - mmm... Fastmail...

-=[[ High Precision Parallax Collecting Satellite

--
http://pw1.netcom.com/~mthorn/divinepr.htm

-----END 0F 0R1GAM1 MA55AG3S-----

Hey, Maestro-Mahatma F0RD!
mathemagickal utterance regarding
the SPITTING of White Hole's
informational content into a parallel
inflating reverse singularity where
mistakes are illusions due to the
SLITTING and RECONNECTING of
TIMELINES inflating entire realms
of cross pollinating MindGland Memes,
WHERE THERE ARE NO MISTAKES, only
trans-temporally retrieved memories;
and Lo, I beheld a WORLD where Jim
Morrison sang for The Rolling Stones,
and Mick Jagger sang for The Doors,
only Morrison's group was actually
called The Rolling Tulips, whose
lead guitarist was none other than
Tiny Tim, and Miss Vicky was the
President of The United States!
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGGGGGHHHHHHH!!!!!!!

-=[[-END-]]=-

V6 DARPA-NASA Star Ship paper
http://tinyurl.com/SarfattiV6

Oct 27

## SETI with entanglement signaling not EM Waves

Posted by: JackSarfatti |
Tagged in: Untagged

On Oct 27, 2011, at 11:46 AM, Paul Murad wrote:

Jack:

Is your entanglement signaling EM or what?

NO! Not necessarily. We can use EM waves, but need not do so. Any matter field will do.

The math is in my V6 DARPA-NASA Star Ship paper at the end.

Entanglement signaling uses the macro-quantum coherent stiff Bohm quantum potential that pilots the classical EM field for example - not the classical EM field itself.

Also we can use massive particles, e.g. entangled quantum dot qubits stored in a solid substrate on board the starship as the receiver states entangled with some non-orthogonal Bose-Einstein condensate sender states back at the Pentagon, Langley whatever. David Kaiser describes this in his book "How the Hippies Save Physics" in my memoranda for CIA & Reagan Admin back in late 1970's and early 1980's - I did not have a scheme that would work back then - but I think I do now.
And are you entangling without EM?  I bet it is....
This is the point... We need to look at different types of communications...
Paul...

From: JACK SARFATTI To: JACK SARFATTI Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 2:14 PM
Subject: Re: Moon Square and Pyramid-Solar System Anomalies
Advanced ETs, IF they exist, do not use retarded EM waves. They use entanglement signaling as in V6 final version of my DARPA Star Ship paper. (unless someone can point out an error in my recent argument)