Ok, remember my (index of refraction)^

4G/c^4 conjecture I will be giving at the

DARPA meeting

http:// http://stardrive.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=4985:darpanasa-starship-orlando-meeting-in-new-york-times&Itemid=82
was partly motivated by our discussions of the limits of your PV model is that

renormalization of the couplings must be scalar invariant under all the relevant symmetries of the dynamical action, this includes local frame transformations to and among accelerating non-inertial frames - even if the symmetry is spontaneously broken inside the material (

e.g. continuous

T3 is spontaneously broken to a discrete crystal lattice group in the ground state of a material even though the basic dynamics is still

T3 invariant when one includes all relevant degrees of freedom - see

P.W. Anderson "More is Different.").

Just this morning I realized that it may be possible to get a nonlinear exponential amplification of the coupling of near field electromagnetic stress-energy current densities to the

geometrodynamic tetrads and spin connection for really low power warp drive.

i.e. ok contracting the full Einstein tensor gravity field equations to their invariant scalar

part-knonlinearT)[(index)^

4GNewton/c^

4Tuu(Einstein Warp Field) = local frame scalar invariant

geometrodynamic warp field current

densitiesuu(Electromagnetic Field) = local frame scalar invariant applied electromagnetic propulsion stress-energy field current densities inside the

metamaterialPuthoff@aol.com wrote:

permittivity and permeability, velocity of light, etc., are in complete accordance with my exploration of the

polarizable vacuum approach as a first-order model for the scalar part of

GR (Found. Phys. paper attached).

P.M. Central Daylight Time,

sarfatti@pacbell.net writes:

DARPA Orlando meeting in new York times today.

wagner <

wagnerart@hotmail.com> wrote:

http://xxx.lanl.gov/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1106/1106.3996v1.pdf