Text Size

Stardrive

Tag » hologram universe
Yes, and I have solved it
 
See slides 25 & 31 of lecture 8 of mike Towler's Cambridge Bohm lectures
 
Pilot Q BIT field is mental in sense of David Chalmers
 
Feedback back-reaction IT hidden variable matter to Pilot Field excites qualia excitations in Pilot 
 
This back-reaction is missing in orthodox QM and that is why no-cloning et al
 
Back-reaction induces Valentini's signal nonlocality with non-random post quantum strings like what I am writing right now.
 
It's same idea Einstein used to go from special relativity to general relativity.
 
Simple.
 
Post quantum gravity = Conscious Universe
 
Post Quantum Wheeler Dewitt Pilot Wave Function of Universe QBIT with back reaction from 3-geometry IT is Hawking's conscious mind of I.J. Good's GOD(D) retrocausal CTC software running on past and future horizon hologram plates (screens) in sense of dS/CFT RG flow from future post selection dS Omega UV fixed point to past Alpha IR fixed point at inflation phase transition. See Strominger's Harvard paper. CFT dilation on the horizon hologram screens maps to time evolution in bulk 3 geometry hologram image. Small entropy at IR Alpha Creation is explained as is Arrow of Time without fine tuning. Pretty picture.

Sent from my iPad

On Aug 27, 2014, at 2:24 PM, Menas Kafatos <mkafatos@gmail.com> wrote:

Or to put it another way, to by-pass the fundamental issue of conscious experience. To claim that the multiverse "solves" this problem is to go outside of science. Sure, the multiverse may indeed be a reality. But that should come out of fundamental physics AND be a falsifiable assertion, not to solve qualia, the hard problem or whether consciousness is the fundamental reality in the universe or not.
 

I disagree

When the events are complex and significant they are not statistical 
New rules apply Vallee's high strangeness 
When an alleged computer from the future tells me in 1953 of what will happen to me in 1973,which happens in fact and which is the cosmic trigger for the narrative in david kaisers MIT book etc that's a real time loop in a block universe in my opinion.
Remember CIA tape recording of my 1953 memory made in 1973 during SRI visit ties in with uri Geller narrative. 
The rules of the game are more like a homicide police investigation rather than statistical analysis of unitary S matrix measurements.
More is different
Emergence of new rules with increasing complexity uniqueness of historical events.

Sent from my iPad

On Apr 7, 2014, at 7:44 PM, Ruth Kastner <rekastner@hotmail.com> wrote:

Yes to clarify I don't rule out that there could be legitimate pre-cognitive experiences. The question is what can be inferred from those. Having well-documented cases of correct predictions does not automatically imply that the future consists of actualized specific events. 


From: beowulfr@interlog.com
To: iksnileiz@gmail.com

Subject: RE: From deadhead to think-outside-the-block head? DR. QUANTUM
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 21:35:31 -0400

Yes Z, but Ruth doesn’t seem to have a problem with discussing the implications of precognition as a possibly real phenomenon.  Like me she seems to be willing to discuss it, but not to go out on a limb and wholeheartedly agree with Jack.  So, we were discussing whether precognition would definitely favor Jack’s theory, or whether it could be explained in her theory as well.  She and I both seemed to make the point that viewing of future events doesn’t necessarily mean that someone is viewing the only possible future – there could be a number of possible futures.

 

Actually, on this point I remember reading some books by Lyall Watson back in the 1980s or early 1990s.  Watson had various of these sorts of psychic precognition examples listed.  I remember that he specifically claimed that aircraft, trains or other vehicles that are going to crash statistically have fewer people on them – that there is a rash of last-minute cancellations before the trip.  I don’t know how rigorous his statistics were and whether this is really true.  However, just assuming for a moment that it is, and that people do have an innate precognitive sense, what does Watson’s argument imply about the future?

 

As I remember Watson’s argument, he is not saying that people have a specific vision of dying in a fiery crash (although IIRC he claims that sometimes that does happen) but just that people get a bad feeling about the trip and come up with some excuse to cancel and do something else.  The precognition in his argument therefore happens at a sort of half-conscious level.

 

Either the people who last minute cancel are never going to die/are not “supposed” to die (whatever that means; maybe Jack’s future cosmological horizon quantum computer is post-determining that they live longer), and the precognition happens in order to actualize the future that is there all along.  Or, the cancellations are simply weird effects at a classical level, kind of like a Novikov self-consistency principle that would cause odd coincidences to happen to prevent you from changing history if you travelled to the past through a wormhole.

 

Alternatively, a future existed in which those people did die, and they precognitively sensed it, and so actualized a different future where they avoided death.  This would mean that the future is changeable through precognition, so multiple possible futures must exist.

 

From: Paul Zielinski [mailto:iksnileiz@gmail.com
Sent: April-07-14 9:08 PM
To: Robert Addinall

Subject: Re: From deadhead to think-outside-the-block head? DR. QUANTUM

 

Except that we were also talking about Ruth Kastner's alternative model for "retro-causality". Which
doesn't agree with Jack's.

Remember?

On 4/7/2014 5:39 PM, Robert Addinall wrote:

 

Anyway, this is exactly what I was saying the other day – for the purposes of this conversation accepting Jack’s concept of precognition as a proven reality is fine.

 

On Mon, 7 Apr 2014, Ruth Kastner wrote:
 
Yes to clarify I don't rule out that there could be legitimate pre-cognitive experiences. The question is what can be inferred from those. Having
well-documented cases of correct predictions does not automatically imply that the future consists of actualized specific events.
_____________________________________________________________
 
 
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 1:18 PM, JACK SARFATTI <jacksarfatti@gmail.com> wrote:
Every really wealthy person I know well personally has an uncanny talent to make good decisions financially.
I am not talking only about stock market.
For example, the Marshall Naify had extraordinary powers akin to Uri Geller’s and Ingo Swann. I personally experienced “mental time travel” with him (shared telepathic experience) to past events (Ancient Egypt, Middle Ages). He saw the potential of cable TV early and was one of the creators of what led to Comcast.
I have also noticed other evidence in them of paranormal talent.
I am not saying this as a scientific fact - only a subjective observation - folklore.
I am not saying that 100% of the 1% are precognitive but that a significant fraction are.
Even successful criminals and evil leaders are.
 
On Apr 9, 2014, at 12:59 PM, CloudRider@aol.com wrote:
 
Question, for Jack, et al...
Is it possible... or have you considered (seriously, with respect)... that what's in play here is a form of human perception perhaps located somewhere on the autism spectrum, even higher-functioning than Asperger's?
 
I am not a brain neuroscientist. I do not know.
 
If such a condition were to allow "tuning" to different signals from what "typical" receivers (people, brains) are capable of picking up. Not to imply "disability" or abnormality, per se, but a "stretch" in what most people are able to perceive... or perceive and retain in consciousness. Also, Jack's signal had to have a 'sender,' who quite likely would know about the "tuning" aspect of human perception, in the 1950s quite new to us.
 
Exactly my point! HIGH STRANGENESS - REALITY OF THE UNCANNY THAT MANY STRAIGHT SCIENTISTS OUT OF FEAR SUPPRESS.
 
Vallee and Davis Physics of High Strangeness ... - skinwalker ranch
www.skinwalkerranch.org/images/Vallee-Davis-model.pdf‎
by JF Vallee - ‎Cited by 6 - ‎Related articles
Oct 24, 2003 - clarify the issues surrounding “high strangeness” observations by ... Jacques Vallée has a Ph.D. in computer science; Eric Davis holds a Ph.D.
You've visited this page 2 times. Last visit: 3/1/14
High Strangeness by Laura Knight-Jadczyk and Arkadiusz Jadczyk
www.cassiopaea.org/cass/high_strangeness.htm‎
The term "high strangeness" is attributed to Dr. J. Allen Hynek who addressed the ... French scientist, Jacques Vallee writes in a paper about High Strangeness:.
High strangeness - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_strangeness‎
Wikipedia
Within the domain of Ufology, high-strangeness is a term used to denote a ... It is perhaps of interest that Jacques Vallee, a close colleague of Hynek, has in a ...
 
 
This doesn't explain "contacts" by some kind of external source using conventional physical means (i.e., the telephone); could these have been an effort to "simulate extraordinary stimulation" by scientists studying such phenomena. I.e., if selected for programming, how to reach Jack (others?) without alarming them?
 
Well, the phone calls were real. Who made them is still a mystery.
 
Conversely, "extraordinary" ET or UT entities intending to contact and influence (this young scientist, retrocausally identified from the future) could have used the telephone because "supernatural" modalities of such "contact" might have triggered a psychotic break or other rejection reaction, by Jack's mother or any subsequently engaged psychiatrists brought in to "help" normalize their target, getting him locked away or chemically restrained, as quite obviously has happened to many other such "revelatees" over millennia?
 
That did not happen to me. But remember I was part of the USG superkids project out of Columbia University AFTER the phone calls throughout high-school with early admission into Ivy League Cornell with full scholarship for four years.
 
This project (also associated with Ayn Rand) was funded by born in Brooklyn (where I lived):
 
The Eugene McDermott Scholars Program - The University of Texas ...
www.utdallas.edu/mcdermott/‎
University of Texas at Dallas
Feb 25, 2014 - Established by Mrs. Eugene McDermott in support of her husband's dream, the McDermott Scholars program provides select UT Dallas ...
‎Application Information - ‎The McDermott Award - ‎Meet the Scholars - ‎Contact Us
Eugene McDermott Library - The University of Texas at Dallas
www.utdallas.edu/library/‎
University of Texas at Dallas
Online catalog, list of newly acquired titles, and general information for the lecture series and the McDermott and Callier Libraries.
‎Databases - ‎Library Hours - ‎Journals - ‎eBooks Collections
Eugene McDermott - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugene_McDermott‎
Wikipedia
Eugene McDermott (1899-1973) was a geophysicist and co-founder first of Geophysical Service and later of Texas Instruments. Born in Brooklyn, New York, on ...
‎Early career - ‎Geophysical Service - ‎Texas Instruments - ‎Philanthropy
You've visited this page 4 times. Last visit: 11/25/13
 
"IT" used the phone because that approach would not necessarily provoke a panicked response the way a "Biblical" manifestion of revelatory experience likely would have, i.e., "messianic" distortion or psychic break.
 
Either way, the net effect was to recontextualize Jack's personality and "genius," providing direction (both overt and subliminally, likely) and opening his mind to a stream of ongoing but more subtle signals later on.
 
Credulity, post-exposure, would be interesting to some scientists contemporaneous to the experience?
 
http://humanbeingsfirst.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/cacheof-summary-paper-the-invasion-from-mars-readings-in-social-psychology-1947-hadley-cantril.pdf
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hadley_Cantril
 
 
On Apr 9, 2014, at 12:08 PM, Paul Zielinski <iksnileiz@gmail.com> wrote:
 
So Jack is not going to be satisfied with retro-causal connections between mere possibilities.
 
For him the future is fully actualized and physically influences the present through CTCs in an
eternal block universe.
 
For him, that is what "precognition" means.
 
On 4/9/2014 11:51 AM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
I disagree
When the events are complex and significant they are not statistical
New rules apply Vallee's high strangeness
When an alleged computer from the future tells me in 1953 of what will happen to me in 1973,which happens in fact and which is the cosmic trigger for the narrative in david kaisers MIT book etc that's a real time loop in a block universe in my opinion.
Remember CIA tape recording of my 1953 memory made in 1973 during SRI visit ties in with uri Geller narrative.
The rules of the game are more like a homicide police investigation rather than statistical analysis of unitary S matrix measurements.
More is different
Emergence of new rules with increasing complexity uniqueness of historical events.
 
Sent from my iPad
 
On Apr 7, 2014, at 7:44 PM, Ruth Kastner <rekastner@hotmail.com> wrote:
 
Yes to clarify I don't rule out that there could be legitimate pre-cognitive experiences. The question is what can be inferred from those. Having well-documented cases of correct predictions does not automatically imply that the future consists of actualized specific events.
 
From: beowulfr@interlog.com
To: iksnileiz@gmail.com
 
Subject: RE: From deadhead to think-outside-the-block head? DR. QUANTUM
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 21:35:31 -0400
 
Yes Z, but Ruth doesn’t seem to have a problem with discussing the implications of precognition as a possibly real phenomenon. Like me she seems to be willing to discuss it, but not to go out on a limb and wholeheartedly agree with Jack. So, we were discussing whether precognition would definitely favor Jack’s theory, or whether it could be explained in her theory as well. She and I both seemed to make the point that viewing of future events doesn’t necessarily mean that someone is viewing the only possible future – there could be a number of possible futures.
 
 
Actually, on this point I remember reading some books by Lyall Watson back in the 1980s or early 1990s. Watson had various of these sorts of psychic precognition examples listed. I remember that he specifically claimed that aircraft, trains or other vehicles that are going to crash statistically have fewer people on them – that there is a rash of last-minute cancellations before the trip. I don’t know how rigorous his statistics were and whether this is really true. However, just assuming for a moment that it is, and that people do have an innate precognitive sense, what does Watson’s argument imply about the future?
 
 
As I remember Watson’s argument, he is not saying that people have a specific vision of dying in a fiery crash (although IIRC he claims that sometimes that does happen) but just that people get a bad feeling about the trip and come up with some excuse to cancel and do something else. The precognition in his argument therefore happens at a sort of half-conscious level.
 
 
Either the people who last minute cancel are never going to die/are not “supposed” to die (whatever that means; maybe Jack’s future cosmological horizon quantum computer is post-determining that they live longer), and the precognition happens in order to actualize the future that is there all along. Or, the cancellations are simply weird effects at a classical level, kind of like a Novikov self-consistency principle that would cause odd coincidences to happen to prevent you from changing history if you travelled to the past through a wormhole.
 
 
Alternatively, a future existed in which those people did die, and they precognitively sensed it, and so actualized a different future where they avoided death. This would mean that the future is changeable through precognition, so multiple possible futures must exist.
 
 
From: Paul Zielinski [mailto:iksnileiz@gmail.com]
Sent: April-07-14 9:08 PM
To: Robert Addinall
 
Subject: Re: From deadhead to think-outside-the-block head? DR. QUANTUM
 
 
Except that we were also talking about Ruth Kastner's alternative model for "retro-causality". Which
doesn't agree with Jack's.
 
Remember?
 
On 4/7/2014 5:39 PM, Robert Addinall wrote:
 
 
Anyway, this is exactly what I was saying the other day – for the purposes of this conversation accepting Jack’s concept of precognition as a proven reality is fine.
 
 
 

 

 

On Jan 8, 2014, at 2:29 PM, Ruth Kastner <rekastner@hotmail.com> wrote:


I'm enjoying Rob's analysis which I think is very helpful.
 
Agreed

Based on his comments it occurred to me that it might be useful to recall that Aristotle talked about four kinds of explanatory causes for any phenomenon: material, efficient, formal, and final. In these terms Jack is content with a formal cause (the symmetries) as an explanation,
 
See below
 
while Jim and Paul regard that as inadequate. Instead they seem to be looking for a material and/or efficient cause.
 
Are they? Let's review.
 
Four Causes refers to an influential principle in Aristotelian thought whereby causes of change or movement are categorized into four fundamental types of answer to the question "why?". Aristotle wrote that "we do not have knowledge of a thing until we have grasped its why, that is to say, its cause."[1][2] While there are cases where identifying a cause is difficult, or in which causes might merge, Aristotle was convinced that his four causes provided an analytical scheme of general applicability.[3]
Aristotle held that there were four kinds of causes:[2][4]
  • A change or movement's material cause is the aspect of the change or movement which is determined by the material which the moving or changing things are made of. For a table, that might be wood; for a statue, that might be bronze or marble.
 
I say the material cause is the "marble" of Einstein's geometrodynamical field molded by the "wood" of the stress-energy current densities of all the non-gravity fields.
 
Therefore, I invoke a material cause as well as symmetries.
 
  • A change or movement's formal cause is a change or movement caused by the arrangement, shape or appearance of the thing changing or moving. Aristotle says for example that the ratio 2:1, and number in general, is the cause of the octave.
  • A change or movement's efficient or moving cause refers to things apart from the thing being changed or moved, which interact so as to be an agency of the change or movement. For example, the efficient cause of a table is a carpenter, or a person working as one, and according to Aristotle the efficient cause of a boy is a father.
  • An event's final cause is the aim or purpose being served by it. That for the sake of which a thing is what it is. For a seed, it might be an adult plant. For a sailboat, it might be sailing. For a ball at the top of a ramp, it might be coming to rest at the bottom.
I am definitely into teleological final cause - Destiny in a Block HOLOGRAM Universe.
 
the future and past cosmological horizons encode the interior bulk
 
the horizons are the hologram plates (computers)
 
the interior bulk are the hologram images
 
  1. Seth Lloyd on The universe as quantum computer - H+ Magazine

    hplusmagazine.com/.../video-friday-brainfood-seth-lloyd-on-the-univers...
     
    Dec 27, 2013 - A recent paper from Dr. Lloyd discusses limits to digital computation as we now employ it, but he further shows that the universe itself is a sort of ...
 
  1. Our universe is a hologram, and we're floating inside of it, suggests ...

    www.extremetech.com › Extreme
    Dec 16, 2013 - If we're living within a hologram and made to think it's just our.... I'm sure the religious nuts of the world would love to have this theory proved.
     
  2. "Our Holographic Universe" --Will It Prove to Be the Greatest Theory ...

    www.dailygalaxy.com/.../our-holographic-universe-it-could-prove-to-be...
     
    Dec 14, 2013 - Re 'vk', just preceding this comment: perhaps one might be able to move in the 3rd dimension of a hologram if one was part of a virtual world...
  3. Physics breakthrough: Is the universe a giant hologram? — RT News

    rt.com/news/space-evidence-universe-hologram-195/
     
    Dec 13, 2013 - In physics, the 'holographic principle' is a property described in string theory. ... This produced a world without gravity laws. However, it did not ...
  4. Holographic principle - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holographic_principle
     
    For the book by Michael Talbot, see The Holographic Universe. .... because the world-sheet theory of string theory was just such a holographic description.
    You've visited this page 5 times. Last visit: 2/13/13
 
 
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_causes
 

I think this points up how important it is to be aware  there is a meta-question involved here concerning what constitutes an adequate explanation and that this is probably what most of the disagreement is really about. Is there a 'right answer' to this? I doubt it, but it's probably good to have as many of the 'causes' addressed as possible (except perhaps for 'final cause' which invokes notions of design and takes us farther away from modern science as usually understood).
 
Here I strongly disagree.
 


Ruth
 
On Jan 8, 2014, at 1:41 AM, Robert Addinall <beowulfr@interlog.com> wrote:

Jim,
 
I anticipated that part of your criticism might be that Jack is accepting things as primitives that aren't - that circles around the sun are nice and symmetrical but that circles being an observed fact doesn't explain why they are there. Sounds like you intend to do a detailed note or two here - so thanks, this should be more interesting than rehashing the fictitious forces argument as it stood (although I realize that this discussion will likely at some point lead right back into it).
 
One thing I'm curious about is where does the inertial reaction force fit into, align with or contradict Jack's gauge invariance math? I can make a verbal argument of sorts about how such a force would relate to the conservation law (along the lines that it is what causes an opposite and equal reaction), but I don't know where to try to plug it into the sort of detailed discussion going on here.
 
Also, I'd like to add Happy New Year to everyone here who uses the standard western calender!
 
 
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Rogers network.
From: jfwoodward@juno.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2014 3:24 AM
To: beowulfr@inte
Subject: RE: About to watch Downton Abbey new series - but before I forget a me
mory about Sylvan Schweber at Brandeis
 

Rob,

Paul will tell you, I expect, that Jack's "explanations" in terms of transformation invariance and Noether's theorem and the like aren't really explanations at all. And I agree. Saying that a conservation law is the physical cause of mass and inertia is really just silly. It's like saying that the Sun and Moon are circular because circles have the most perfect symmetry. Sounds profound. And says nothing about the physics of gravitational accretion and energy minimization.

To characterize my position as in some sense a theory that is independent of general relativity and so dismissable without doing violence to general relativity is also wrong. I assert that general relativity and the standard procedures of field theory, with the WMAP results, accounts for inertia and inertial forces without ANY further theoretical assumptions. Those determined to believe that the quantum vacuum has something to do with inertia are, understandably, not please with this as it renders their speculations irrelevant. But physics is about what's right, not what makes us feel warm and fuzzy.

I had planned on addressing this tonight. But it is late; and I have an early trip into LA in the morning. And I want those who are not professional physicists on the list to be able to follow the main points of the argument. That means providing some historical context, for this stuff is hard enough to follow when you know the context. Without the context, it's all a bunch of symbol salad for most. So I'll tackle this maybe tomorrow. And do it in as many digestible pieces as seems warranted. Jack can then tell everyone it's a bunch of word salad. And Paul can correct my errors. :-)

Best,

Jim
____________________________________________________________
 
On Jan 8, 2014, at 1:18 AM, Robert Addinall <beowulfr@interlog.com> wrote:

 

One point I should add: when I talk about the causally connected universe from the point of view of Jim's phi=c^2 gravity, I talk about the future cosmological horizon (where the event horizon and hubble sphere coincide) because we've been assuming that Wheeler-Feynman advanced radiation-reaction is the mechanism for some of this stuff. Basically an effect propagates (ie. radiates) through spacetime in the "forward" time direction and interacts with other matter in our future, which then sends a reaction wave back through spacetime in the "backwards" direction.
 
There would be a different (more complete) definition if you were talking about the causally connected universe extending into our past.
 
However, I didn't get into such details (which have been argued over before) because I wanted to stay with relatively simple analogies that I wouldn't get terribly wrong ;)
 
Rob

 

 
On Jan 7, 2014, at 7:34 PM, Robert Addinall <beowulfr@interlog.com> wrote:

There is actually potentially a really interesting discussion here.  We have Jack’s theory that particles with mass exhibit inertial resistance to being pushed off geodesic because action-reaction arises purely locally based on gauge invariance and gauge transformation – a local theory.  And, we have the opposite, a distance approach – Jim’s argument that the origin of inertia is to be found in the gravitational interaction of all matter in the causally connected universe.  Both claim to be consistent with GR, but are at opposite ends of a spectrum.
 
If we agree that spacetime curvature around sources and off-geodesic acceleration are frame invariant objective realities, then we all agree that objects in free fall will “fall” towards the COM of the Earth and that objects “hovering” in the Earth’s gravity field on the surface of the Earth due to electrical contact forces always weigh the same on a scale.  So, then the question of whether there is a real Newtonian gravity force comes down to whether a force is needed to explain why objects remain on inertial trajectories until pushed off them by electrical contact forces (ie. an “origin of inertia”) or whether the gauge invariance idea is sufficient.
 
So in terms of Jack’s gauge invariance discussion – is it wrong?  If so, why?  Is it not wrong but incomplete?  If so, why?  Then we can compare its strengths and weaknesses to the strengths and weaknesses of Jim’s argument.
 
Again, Jack’s argument (highlighted in red):
 
I actually have not seen it in any textbooks, which treat the gauge transformations purely as formal manipulations with no direct physical meaning
 
Again because the basic idea is so simple and beautiful that it's amazing that not even Feynman noticed it 
In the case of Maxwell's electromagnetic field the argument goes like this
 
The Canonical momentum of a test charge is
 
P = mv + eA
 
P is gauge invariant under U1 internal symmetry gauge transformations
 
mv -> mv + hgradS
 
eA-> eA - hgradS
 
S = quantum phase of test particle of inertia m and electric charge e
 
mv is charge's kinetic momentum
 
eA is the electromagnetic field momentum sitting smack on the center of mass of the charge
 
This is as local a contact force as one can imagine
 
hgradS is the momentum exchange of a virtual longitudinal near Field photon
 
Therefore newton's third law of action with equal and opposite reaction is trivially automatically obeyed locally between field and charged particle
 
dP/dt = 0
 
Canonical momentum is conserved in time when there were only virtual photon exchanges between particle and field forming a closed system
 
Of course A depends on faraway sources via the greens function propagator integrals with the source distributions
 
Implies
 
mdv/dt = - edA/dt = eE
 
E = electric real force field
 
When we do this in special relativity we get more terms 
 
I know how to extend the same kind of argument to the gravity field
 
  1. It seems to me that Bohmian beables are obviously required.
    1) fact is that we live in a classical macroscopic world where the fundamental observable is Maxwell's local classical electromagnetic field tensor F
    obeying in Cartan form notation
    F = dA
    dF = 0
    d*F = *J
    * = Hodge dual
    All our information about other fermion matter fields comes indirectly via F and also A if you include the Bohm-Aharonov quantum effect.
    Therefore, the basic classical observable is the F electromagnetic field.
    As Basil Hiley explains this beable F is an infinite-dimensional field configuration on a spacelike or lightlike surface in which each spacetime event is a "dimension". It has a super Q and photons are not localized like massive fermions are. If, instead of the continuum, we use a voxelated 3D + 1 world crystal lattice (Kleinert) then the hologram principle tells us that the lattice spacing is not the Planck length Lp, but rather it is L where
    L^3 = Lp^2A^1/2
    A = area - entropy of the horizon screen Seth pixelated computer
    The number of BITs in J. A. Wheeler's
    IT FROM BIT
    is N = A/4Lp^2 = A^3/2/L^3 ~ 10^52/10^-70 ~ 10^122 in our actual causal diamond pictured here
    Showing Apast and A future with 3D volumes of both retarded history and advanced destiny influence on the 3D lightlike slices. I think Susskind's student Raphael Buosso at UC Berkeley has worked this all out mathematically though perhaps not with the advanced Wheeler-Feynman -Cramer-Aharonov effect?
    Note the change in Heisenberg's uncertainty principle which according to Susskind et-al is
    &x ~ h/&p + Lp^2&p/h
    However, I think it may really be
    &x ~ h/&p + L^2&p/h
    Note that
    Lp = 10^-35 meters
    A^1/2 = 10^26 meters
    L^3 ~ 10^-7010^26 = 10^-44 meters^3
    L ~ 10^-15 meter ~ 1 fermi ~ 1 Gev
    for the voxel unit cell of the hologram image world crystal lattice
    Hawking's black body radiation is a horizon surface effect
    T ~ A^-1/2
    I predict a second high temperature horizon thickness Hawking radiation of temperature
    T' ~ (LcA^1/2)^-1/2
    (LcA^1/2) is the proper length quantum thickness of the Horizon as a "stretched membrane" (Kip Thorne)
    Therefore, the stretched membrane is a very efficient Carnot limited heat engine with
    (Work outpu/Heat input ) < 1 - (Lc/A^1'2)^1/2 ---> 0 as A^1/2 ---> Lp (Planck black hole)
    Lc is the formal UV cutoff
    Now there may be a spectrum of such cutoff's. Sinziana Paduroiu's astrophysicist colleagues in Paris suggest that Susskind's cut off of Lp corresponds to Hawking gravity wave black body radiation.
    Note that for precision cosmology (LpA^1/2)^1/2 ~ (10^-3510^26)^1/2 ~ (10^-9)^1/2 ~ 10^-3 meters ~ 10^11 Hz corresponding to the observed dark energy density. However, it is easily shown that this must come from our future horizon as a retro-causal back-from-the-future "destiny" (Aharonov) effect.
    Search Results
    Back From the Future | DiscoverMagazine.com
    discovermagazine.com/2010/apr/01-back-from-the-future
    Aug 26, 2010 – A series of quantum experiments shows that measurements performed in the future can influence the present. Does that mean the universe has ...
    On Jun 26, 2013, at 12:18 PM, Ruth Kastner <rekastner@hotmail.com> wrote:
    Thanks Jack, I'll look at these. But to the extent that you have to adduce a Bohmian picture to support your claim, I can't buy it, because I don't think the 'beable' approach is correct. I don't agree that there are 'beables'. RK
    Back From the Future | DiscoverMagazine.com
    discovermagazine.com
    A series of quantum experiments shows that measurements performed in the future can influence the present. Does that mean the universe has a destiny—and the laws of physics pull us inexorably toward our prewritten fate?

The thin sheet of reality of the hologram universe is the brane of Hawking's Mind of God. ;-)
Destiny

1) S-Matrix?


S-Matrix is an input-output black box model for scattering of simple beams of non-interacting particles (ensembles) on similar ensembles of targets (true each target can be a complex system like a crystal or fluid with quasiparticles and collective mode excited states of the ground state).

The inputs and outputs are external lines corresponding to poles of the Feynman propagators in the complex energy plane. In other words they are real particles on-mass-shell. If massless bosons in the classical limit they are radiative far fields of only two transverse polarization if spin 1 (EM) or spin 2 (gravity).

Virtual particles are inside the black box (internal lines of the Feynman diagrams).

However, for cosmology and the hologram universe - for horizons the S-Matrix is incomplete. Sure you can use it for collapsing matter increasing the area-entropy of the horizon (black hole) or matter flowing out of the causal diamond in the case of our observer-dependent future cosmological event horizon.

However, the stable state is completely off-mass-shell, i.e. coherent Glauber states of off-mass-shell virtual bosons like the EM near fields of electrical power engineering of our grid and our every day electrical machines and home appliances. PG & E mainly deals with near fields. High energy physicists seem to draw a blank on near fields. The most important parts of the universe are near fields.

Thus the two most important toy model SSS metrics in Einstein's GR are

g00 = 1 - rs/r  etc. black hole


g0'0' = 1 - r'^2/A

with horizons g00 = 0 and g0'0' = 0

Quantum mechanically speaking these metrics are made out of Glauber coherent states of off-mass-shell gravitons of zero frequency and a continuous spectrum of wave vectors.

GRAVITY WAVES PLAY NO ROLE in this static limit.

Yes, they do when excited states of the pixeled stretched membrane (Kip Thorne) with scrambled BITs for distant observers is included, i.e. Hawking radiation. But that is treated in perturbation theory around the above static solutions.

Now I do remember that the S-Matrix can be extended to treat bound states so maybe that is the way out of the dilemma?

2) 't Hooft's naive rejection of Aharonov's destiny post-selection &Wheeler-Feynman Cramer's transactions, CTCs in quantum computing, and invoking the Red Herring of the Grandfather paradox - see the World Science Festival 2011 video with 't Hooft, Susskind, Verlinde, Buosso - moderated by Hockenberry of PBS.

 't Hooft toward the end does begin to notice Godzilla in the room. He is mistaken when he says there is no evidence for back-from-the-future retro-causal (e.g., Cramer handshake transactions, dark energy itself, Libet - Radin - Bierman - Bem brain EEG presponse, Aharonov destiny post-selection, Valentini signal nonlocality effects). However 't Hooft is correct to note a tension between the hologram idea and retarded causality. The future light cone of the observer where it intersects its future horizon is responsible for datk energy and most of the hologram voxel imaging.

It's curious that Lenny thinks it's a c-BIT per pixel. Why is it not a SPINOR q-BIT per pixel?

    •  
      A Thin Sheet of Reality: The Universe as a Hologram (Full): http://t.co/SzJY7HrgON via @youtube
       
      A Thin Sheet of Reality: The Universe as a Hologram (Full)
      youtu.be
      2011 World Science Festival panel discussion on the holographic principle. http://worldsciencefestival.com/videos/a_thin_sheet_of_reality_the_universe_as_a_h...

 

    • A Thin Sheet of Reality: The Universe as a Hologram (Full): http://t.co/SzJY7HrgON via @youtube
      A Thin Sheet of Reality: The Universe as a Hologram (Full)
      youtu.be
      2011 World Science Festival panel discussion on the holographic principle. http://worldsciencefestival.com/videos/a_thin_sheet_of_reality_the_universe_as_a_h...
    • BBC Horizon 2005: 5/7 The Hawking Paradox: http://t.co/CpDJtlN1Nn via @youtube
      BBC Horizon 2005: 5/7 The Hawking Paradox
      youtu.be
      According to Susskind, if Hawking's ideas were correct then it would infect all physics; there would no longer be any direct link between cause and effect. P...
  1. UFOS AND STAR GATE WORMHOLES
    Like · · Share
    • Jack Sarfatti Begin forwarded message:

      From: JACK SARFATTI <adastra1@me.com>
      Subject: Re: Curved Traversable Wormholes
      Date: June 22, 2013 9:07:21 AM PDT
      ...See More
      humansarefree.com
      L'expérience avec le tube de cuivre et l'aimant permanent s'explique grâce à un ...See More
    • Edgar Diem When comes the first official revelation to the world? You should know Jack
    • Jonathan Vos Post .
      Cool horizons for entangled black holes
      Juan Maldacena, Leonard Susskind
      (Submitted on 3 Jun 2013)
      General relativity contains solutions in which two distant black holes are connected through the interior via a wormhole, or Einstein-Rosen bridge. The
      se solutions can be interpreted as maximally entangled states of two black holes that form a complex EPR pair. We suggest that similar bridges might be present for more general entangled states.
      In the case of entangled black holes one can formulate versions of the AMPS(S) paradoxes and resolve them. This suggests possible resolutions of the firewall paradoxes for more general situations.
      Comments: 48 pages, 23 figures
      Subjects: High Energy Physics - Theory (hep-th)
      Cite as: arXiv:1306.0533 [hep-th]
      (or arXiv:1306.0533v1 [hep-th] for this version)
      Submission history
      From: Juan Maldacena [view email]
      [v1] Mon, 3 Jun 2013 18:56:30 GMT (303kb,D)


The question Lenny should have asked in that lecture is whether we are 3D images whose information is scrambled all over our past and future 2D horizons relative to observers outside them in the multiverse?


Leonard Susskind on The World As Hologram http://t.co/iGIdSw91es


Leonard Susskind on The World As Hologram
lnkd.in
Leonard Susskind of the Stanford Institute for Theoretical Physics discusses the indestructability of information and the nature of black holes in a lecture ...



Jack Sarfatti 1 minute ago

Lenny is a very clear and good teacher. We worked together at Cornell with Johnny Glogower in the early 1960's on the problem of time and coherent phase of oscillators in quantum theory. The lecture is excellent and clearly explains important cutting edge ideas. I do have a number of comments below.

·

Jack Sarfatti 1 second ago

1) alleged first law of physics (technically unitarity of the S-Matrix) that the total number of bits is conserved. Is this really consistent with the second law of thermodynamics that the entropy of a closed system generally increases? Is it consistent with the evolution of complexity of matter including life and knowledge as the universe expands? The universe was very small at the moment of inflation followed by the hot big bang. Are all the bits we see today already hidden in the big bang?

· in reply to Jack Sarfatti (Show the comment)

Jack Sarfatti 1 second ago

With the emergence of new order as in spontaneous symmetry breaking of the vacuum for virtual particles and the ground states of real many-particle complex systems - is the S-Matrix fundamentally non-unitary? At least the question needs to be asked and made conscious. Lenny's description of horizon thermodynamics & complementarity is excellent - how Alice's bits get scrambled all over the black hole horizon as seen by Bob far away from her. Bob's light will burn up her if he tries to look etc.

· in reply to Jack Sarfatti (Show the comment)

Jack Sarfatti 1 second ago

We are outside black holes, but we are inside our cosmological horizons. Lenny only talks about our observer-dependent past particle horizon. That's half the story. Tamara Davis shows that we also have a future event horizon and that the Hubble sphere where expansion rate is c is different from both horizons. Wheeler-Feynman-Hoyle-Narlikar­-Cramer-Aharonov all show that the future absorptions of light are loops in time with the past emissions.

· in reply to Jack Sarfatti (Show the comment)

Jack Sarfatti 1 second ago

Dark energy accelerating our universe may be advanced back-from-the-future Hawking radiation emissions from our future de Sitter horizon of energy density hc/Lp^4 that is gravitationally redshifted down to hc/Lp^2A where A is the area of our future horizon at its intersection with our future light cone. The competing cosmological blue shift is tiny at z = 1/2 compared to the advanced gravity redshift of z ~ A^1/4/Lp^1/2 ~ 10^30.5



Jack Sarfatti

11 hours ago via Twitter
Professor Dr. Sir Roger Penrose on new clues to the basics of conscious ... http://t.co/ZJGqgTJUr7


Professor Dr. Sir Roger Penrose on new clues to the basics of conscious mentality
lnkd.in
Professor Dr. Sir Roger Penrose is Emeritus Rouse Ball Professor of Mathematics at the University of Oxford and has received numerous prizes and awards, amon...
Like · · @JackSarfatti on Twitter · Share

Jack Sarfatti

11 hours ago via Twitter
The something new that Roger is aware of is brain presponse - most recently "Feeling the (@YouTube http://t.co/dp9jwpzxWs)


Sir Roger Penrose — The quantum nature of consciousness
youtu.be
Sir Roger Penrose. Quantum Consciousness Theorist — Co-creator of the Orch OR model of the quantum nature of consciousness and memory. http://GF2045.com/spea...
Like · · @JackSarfatti on Twitter · Share

Jack Sarfatti

11 hours ago via Twitter
Boeing brings 787 Dreamliners, ScanEagle UAS to Paris Air Show http://t.co/MqML5nKdO2


Boeing brings 787 Dreamliners, ScanEagle UAS to Paris Air Show
lnkd.in
bPARIS, 17 June 2013. bThe Boeing Company is featuring a pair of superefficient 787 Dreamliner commercial airliners and the Boeing ScanEagle unmanned aircraft system (UAS) at the Paris Air Show. img src=content/dam/etc/medialib/platform-7/avionics-intelligence/articles/news/2010/07/50244.res One 787…
Like · · @JackSarfatti on Twitter · Share

Jack Sarfatti

11 hours ago via Twitter
Buzz Aldrin signs copies of his book at Paris Air Show http://t.co/sMgkMtmYe1


Buzz Aldrin signs copies of his book at Paris Air Show
lnkd.in
bPARIS, 17 June 2013.bnbsp;American astronaut Buzz Aldrin--who walked on the moon 21 July 1969 as part of Apollo 11,nbsp;the first manned lunar landing in history--is signing copies of his book,nbsp;iMission to Mars: My Vision for Space Explorationi, at Paris Air Show today. img src=content/dam/avi/…
Like · · @JackSarfatti on Twitter · Share

Jack Sarfatti

11 hours ago via Twitter
Sir Roger Penrose, Aeons before the Big Bang (Copernicus Center Lecture ... http://t.co/EmvRPBcjnS


Sir Roger Penrose, Aeons before the Big Bang (Copernicus Center Lecture 2010)
lnkd.in
The second Copernicus Center Lecture was delivered by Professor Roger Penrose, a famous physicist and philosopher of science. Professor Penrose titled his sp...
Like · · @JackSarfatti on Twitter · Share

Jack Sarfatti

11 hours ago via Twitter
Closer To Truth asks Roger Penrose: What Things Really Exist? http://t.co/c9WNOKAS5C


Closer To Truth asks Roger Penrose: What Things Really Exist?
lnkd.in
For more videos and information, visit http://www.closertotruth.com What things really exist? Our host Robert Lawrence Kuhn poses the question to Roger Penro...
Like · · @JackSarfatti on Twitter · Share
This post is now hidden from your timeline.
It will still appear in search, news feed and other places on Facebook. Delete

Jack Sarfatti

11 hours ago via Twitter
Roger Penrose on Twistors and Quantum Non-Locality http://t.co/m0Y2pOmlQ6


Roger Penrose on Twistors and Quantum Non-Locality
lnkd.in
Emeritus Professor of Mathematics at University of Oxford, Sir Roger Penrose, discusses Twistors and Quantum Non-Locality.
Like · · @JackSarfatti on Twitter · Share

Jack Sarfatti

11 hours ago via Twitter
Leonard Susskind on The World As Hologram http://t.co/iGIdSw91es



On Dec 29, 2012, at 2:20 PM, Paul Murad <ufoguypaul@yahoo.com> wrote:

 
This is a very pessimistic perspective.
 
Man by itself is incapable of developing morality and ethics except with God. You mention
death, well if there is a hell, the believe that they exist without god or absence that we can
assume means love for that matter may indeed make hell a very empty disparate place.
 
The crutch that exists may not be fully a religious point but rather a historical view that is part
of mankind's culture. These things happened, are real and they occurred. Regarding your view about
different religious causing problems, I would have to agree but I do not see any contradiction
in believing in God and the possibility of reincarnation...
 
To mention Jung-Pauli is child-play... Scientists are only rarely right and on metaphysical subjects,
we do not have the physical evidence to judge truth or falsehood with a clearly defined scientific
investigation.
 
Paul
Paul M,
1) Rupert Sheldrake's morphogenetic field data is direct evidence for the Jung-Pauli information field.

2) The Central Intelligence Agency Stanford Research Institute Remote Viewing data is evidence for the Jung-Pauli information field.

3) Reincarnation data is evidence for the Jung-Pauli information field.

on all of the above see in particular Russell Targ's several new books as well as Hal Puthoff's on-line report.

4) There is a solid theoretical physics basis for it

a) David Bohm's Implicate Order = world hologram screen software on both our past and future cosmic horizons - the Alpha Point past particle horizon and the Omega Point future event horizon shown in my modification of Tamara Davis's PhD fig 1.1c



For details see http://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~mdt26/pilot_waves.html (note also Lecture 8)

The work of MIT physicist Seth Lloyd shows that these two cosmological horizons are computers.

I think they are conscious computers i.e. Hawking's Mind of God - literally

See also the papers of Antony Valentini on signal nonlocality

e.g.
Subquantum Information and Computation
Antony Valentini
(Submitted on 11 Mar 2002 (v1), last revised 12 Apr 2002 (this version, v2))
It is argued that immense physical resources - for nonlocal communication, espionage, and exponentially-fast computation - are hidden from us by quantum noise, and that this noise is not fundamental but merely a property of an equilibrium state in which the universe happens to be at the present time. It is suggested that 'non-quantum' or nonequilibrium matter might exist today in the form of relic particles from the early universe. We describe how such matter could be detected and put to practical use. Nonequilibrium matter could be used to send instantaneous signals, to violate the uncertainty principle, to distinguish non-orthogonal quantum states without disturbing them, to eavesdrop on quantum key distribution, and to outpace quantum computation (solving NP-complete problems in polynomial time).
Comments:    10 pages, Latex, no figures. To appear in 'Proceedings of the Second Winter Institute on Foundations of Quantum Theory and Quantum Optics: Quantum Information Processing', ed. R. Ghosh (Indian Academy of Science, Bangalore, 2002). Second version: shortened at editor's request; extra material on outpacing quantum computation (solving NP-complete problems in polynomial time)
Subjects:    Quantum Physics (quant-ph)
Journal reference:    Pramana - J. Phys. 59 (2002) 269-277
DOI:    10.1007/s12043-002-0117-1
Report number:    Imperial/TP/1-02/15
Cite as:    arXiv:quant-ph/0203049
     (or arXiv:quant-ph/0203049v2 for this version)

Also see the 46 minute raw video of me and Dan Smith discussing this. I look like a frumpy shlepper in it, but the content is good.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=A56hT_51v7I 

Tong's key point in December's 2012 Scientific American is that chiral fermions needed for the weak force cannot be computed in lattice gauge theory.
This seems an odd claim unless Wilzcek's QCD for strong gluon-quark force is not at all able to deal with the weak force?
So that would mean the quarks in QCD are not chiral?
Will some expert please pipe in on this?

A Computable Universe" is now available in Kindle edition:

    http://www.amazon.com/dp/B009WG4C34

Also, coming next week, Nassim Nicholas Taleb's "Antifragile":
    http://www.amazon.com/dp/1400067820

See also

    http://www.fourmilab.ch/fourmilog/archives/2011-02/001290.html

    http://www.fourmilab.ch/fourmilog/archives/2009-01/001103.html