Text Size

Stardrive

Tag » multiverse

Subject: Particle fever a fork in the road the movie

 

Don't miss it I just saw it

If the Higgs mass was 115 GeV it would be strong evidence for super symmetry connecting fermions to bosons
And that case there is still room for an intelligent designer acting back from the future dark energy DeSitter cosmic horizon programming a virtual hologram universe simulation

10^120 ~ 1/ / qubits

IT From BIT
+
BIT From IT
=
Entanglement Signal Nonlocality

If the Higgs mass was 140 GeV it would be strong evidence for Tegmark's multi-verse levels one and two in that case the mass of the electron etc. is a random coincidence in the cosmic landscape of string theory

In fact the Higgs mass is 125 GeV smack in the middle pretty much

Therefore God is subtle but not malicious as Einstein said

I do predict they will never find a dark matter particle however because dark matter is made from virtual particles inside the quantum vacuum in my opinion

Sent from my iPad

Frank is talking about Tegmark Everett Deutsch Level 3.

Do not confuse that with the string theory predictions that are only for Tegmark Level 2.

Frank's BASIC result is well-known it's in Ch 11 of Murray Gell-Mann's THE QUARK AND THE JAGUAR and in one of Henry Stapp's formulation of Bell's theorem that

1) Born probability rule P = |Psi|^2

2) Counter-Factual Definiteness

3) No-faster-than-light influence of any kind

are incompatible, i.e. not all of them can be true without logical contradiction.

Gell Mann & Tiple assume 1) & 3) are true & 2) is false at it is in Everett's Level 3 multiverse

Stapp et-al assume both 1) & 2) are true. Therefore 3) is false.

However, even the Pundits FUBAR on this point because the precision cosmology evidence that may be explainable by string theory is completely irrelevant dealing only with Tegmark Level 2.

There is widespread confusion & sloppy thinking on the meanings of the single term "multiverse" even by experts who should know better.

The post-quantum theory first professed by yours truly & Josephson (w Pallikari) independently in parallel and now backed up by Antony Valentini's work denies 1) for living matter. 1) still works for dead matter.

However, Valentini shows that if 1) is false then 3) is also false. They are not independent.

Of course, all three may be false without contradiction.




Gary that is not quite correct. What you say is only for Level 1 on a SINGLE INFLATION BUBBLE!
LOOK CAREFULLY AT MAD MAX'S PICTURE
you missed Level 2

Both Levels 1 & 2 are Bohmian "not" hidden variables of Wheeler's IT
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Broglie–Bohm_theory
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qm-bohm/
Max's Level 3 is the de Broglie pilot wave (super quantum potential for EM fields etc.)
http://iopscience.iop.org/0305-4470/37/49/011/

However, the number of material IT worlds at Levels 1 & 2 may be finite as you say.


http://space.mit.edu/home/tegmark/crazy.html

On Sep 6, 2012, at 9:59 AM, Gary S Bekkum <garysbekkum@gmail.com> wrote:

It is a misconception there are an infinite number of what we call worlds. There is a very large but finite set of emergent classical worlds limited by the expansion of space and the finite speed of light.

Gary S. Bekkum
STARpod.US
STARstream Research
VM (763) 439-0719