Text Size

Stardrive

Tag » quantum computers

Einstein was writing all this before modern quantum theory. Today we know that the Aether is the quantum vacuum filled with virtual particles that are off mass-shell i.e. E^2 =/= (pc)^2 + (mc^2)^2 Also contact forces are caused by off-mass shell virtual photons in the non-radiative near field including longitudinal polarizations absent in real photons on the mass shell (light cone). Action at a distance is in the Wheeler-Feynman classical sense confined to the photon mass shell (aka light cone) but including advanced back from the future destiny waves generalized to "confirmation" quantum de Broglie waves by John Cramer in his TI. This is in addition to the more familiar retarded history waves. de Broglie waves are faster than light in phase quantum information when m =/= 0 though slower than light in energy transport. nonlocal EPR correlations are explained by retrocausal advanced confirmation destiny waves in the Feynman zig zag (term coined by O Costa de Beauregard). On Jun 22, 2014, at 8:09 PM, Paul Zielinski wrote: And he said almost the same things in 1924: http://www.oe.eclipse.co.uk/nom/aether.htm On 6/22/2014 7:46 PM, art wagner wrote: The Einstein Ether (1920): http://www.bonus.manualsforall.com/Educational/Albert-Einstein/Albert Einstein - Ether And The Theory Of Relativity.PDF

Some new additions to my Stargate book

Stargate 
Making Star Trek Real
Jack Sarfatti
Internet Science Education Project
Foreword

“The future, and the future alone, is the home of explanation.”
Henry Dwight Sedgwick 

“Sarfatti's Cave is the name I'll give to the Caffe Trieste in San Francisco, where Jack Sarfatti, Ph.D. in physics, writes his poetry, evokes his mystical, miracle-working ancestors, and has conducted a several-decade-long seminar on the nature of reality … to a rapt succession of espresso scholars. ... It's Jack Sarfatti against the world, and he is indomitable. …One of his soaring theories is that things which have not happened yet can cause events in the present.” Gold, Herbert. Bohemia: Where Art, Angst, Love & Strong Coffee Meet. 

There is now a significant body of results on quantum interactions with closed timelike curves (CTCs) in the quantum information literature, … As a consequence, there is a prima facie argument exploiting entanglement that CTC interactions would enable superluminal and, indeed, effectively instantaneous signaling. …. Using the consistency condition, we show that there is a procedure that allows Alice to signal to Bob in the past via relayed superluminal communications between spacelike-separated Alice and Clio, and spacelike-separated Clio and Bob. This opens the door to time travel paradoxes in the classical domain … offering a possible window on what we might expect in a future theory of quantum gravity. Quantum interactions with closed timelike curves and superluminal signaling, Jeffrey Bub and Allen Stairs, PHYSICAL REVIEW A 89, 022311 (2014)

‘In this case, Bob possesses the unknown state even before Alice implements the teleportation. Causality is not violated because Bob cannot foresee Alice’s measurement result, which is completely random. But, if we could pick out only the proper result, the resulting “projective” teleportation would allow us to travel along spacelike intervals, to escape from black holes, or to travel in time.” Seth Lloyd et-al 

This is a series of blog essays about teleological destiny, quick time travel to colonize Earthlike exoplanets through stargates, and the possibility that we are three-dimensional hologram images in a virtual reality programmed by a cosmological conscious super-intelligence that is alive and well on our future two-dimensional dark energy edge of space that we can ever hope to see with light signals. My speculative hypothesis-conjecture of this book is that our idea of time and cause and effect is profoundly wrong. In particular the “unproven theorem paradox” of time travel is not a paradox at all.
“The “unproved theorem” paradox points out that if there are CTCs, then it might be possible to take a published proof of a theorem into the past and present it to someone, who then uses it to produce the very manuscript that leads to the theorem’s publication Bub & Stairs op-cit 

Evidence on “brain presponse” (Libet, Radin, Bierman, Bem) suggests that our consciousness and creativity are such meme self-creating strange loops. The universe does only not emerge out of the past, but is also pulled toward the future for a purpose. This idea is not new in philosophy, but has reappeared in physics starting with the work of John Archibald Wheeler and Richard Feynman in the 1940s. This back-from-the-future effect is needed to understand the nature of both dark matter and dark energy that is most of the stuff in our accelerating universe and most importantly to understand our own consciousness and how to reach the stars and beyond.
 
Jack Sarfatti
6 minutes ago via Twitter
  •  
    http://t.co/1Su7kSJkJk
    Phys. Rev. A 89, 022311 (2014) - Quantum interactions with closed timelike curves and...
    journals.aps.org
    There is now a significant body of results on quantum interactions with closed timelike curves (CTCs) in the quantum information literature, for both the Deutsch model of CTC interactions (D-CTCs) and the projective model (P-CTCs). As a consequence, there is a prima facie argument exploiting entangl…
     
     
     
  • Jack Sarfatti "There is now a significant body of results on quantum interactions with closed timelike curves (CTCs) in the quantum information literature, for both the Deutsch model of CTC interactions (D-CTCs) and the projective model (P-CTCs). As a consequence, there is a prima facie argument exploiting entanglement that CTC interactions would enable superluminal and, indeed, effectively instantaneous signaling. In cases of spacelike separation between the sender of a signal and the receiver, whether a receiver measures the local part of an entangled state or a disentangled state to access the signal can depend on the reference frame. We propose a consistency condition that gives priority to either an entangled perspective or a disentangled perspective in spacelike-separated scenarios. For D-CTC interactions, the consistency condition gives priority to frames of reference in which the state is disentangled, while for P-CTC interactions the condition selects the entangled state. Using the consistency condition, we show that there is a procedure that allows Alice to signal to Bob in the past via relayed superluminal communications between spacelike-separated Alice and Clio, and spacelike-separated Clio and Bob. This opens the door to time travel paradoxes in the classical domain. Ralph [T. C. Ralph, arXiv:1107.4675 [quant-ph].] first pointed this out for P-CTCs, but we show that Ralph's procedure for a “radio to the past” is flawed. Since both D-CTCs and P-CTCs allow classical information to be sent around a spacetime loop, it follows from a result by Aaronson and Watrous [S. Aaronson and J. Watrous, Proc. R. Soc. A 465, 631 (2009)] for CTC-enhanced classical computation that a quantum computer with access to P-CTCs would have the power of PSPACE, equivalent to a D-CTC-enhanced quantum computer."
  • Jack Sarfatti This is high octane fuel for my starship warp engine with Q continuum telepathic psychokinetic mind-control. 

http://physics.aps.org/browse/subjectarea/quantum-info

Close

  1. PhysOrg.com - Science, Research, Technology, Physics, Nanotech, Space News
    Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Computation
    • Jack Sarfatti Together this is a self-organizing creative feedback loop in time including retro-causal entanglement signal nonlocality in strong violation of orthodox quantum theory.
    • Jack Sarfatti Orthodox quantum theory breaks down for living matter in the same way that special relativity breaks down globally when there are real non-zero gravity (space-time curvature) fields present.
    • Jack Sarfatti Things impossible in the smaller theory are possible in the larger theory that contains the former as a limiting case when some set of control parameters vanish.
    • Jack Sarfatti This is new wine in new bottles.
    • Jack Sarfatti 2.1 of the dissertation is a bit disappointing - too vague & may have some errors like what is allegedly experienced inside the black hole, e.g., time is dilated and size contracted to the outside observer not to inside observer.
    • Jack Sarfatti Moving on "Ideal concurrency due to superposition must be valid for quantum states, otherwise placing a detector after one of the slits in the twin-slit experiment could not retroactively create the self-consistent effect of the single photon passing o...See More
    • Jack Sarfatti "Quantum-encoded states directly address both primary computation resources (i.e. space and time) by allowing an unlimited locality metric, thus eliminating the need for the sequential integration of partial results. Quantum systems are always self-con...See More
    • Jack Sarfatti 2.3.1 is not intelligible to me
    • Jack Sarfatti Moving on "Two major classes of quantum algorithm exist. The first class is the implementation of traditional classical algorithms using quantum implementations of reversible logic gates to be discussed later, such as Fredkin and Toffoli gates [24]. Quantum Finite State Automata (QFSA) also fall into this category. These algorithms may be useful for implementing traditional logic when the nanoelectronics scaling limit is reached; they only use classical states and offer no computation gain due to superposition or entanglement."
    • Jack Sarfatti I will only quote what I find intelligible.
    • Jack Sarfatti "The second class of quantum algorithm outperforms its classical counterpart by using superposition and entangled states. Shor’s factoring algorithm [34] (which uses the Quantum Fourier Transform (QFT)) and Grover’s quantum search algorithm [14] are the primary known algorithms in this class. A very useful outcome of the present research would be to create programming tools to aid in designing both classes of algorithms."
    • Jack Sarfatti My Cornell professor Wolfgang Rindler was also on this guy's committee in Dallas, Texas. But Rindler is very old and obviously did not read the dissertation line by line or he would have made cuts in the obscure badly written parts.
    • Jack Sarfatti Rindler and Roger Penrose did important work on spinors in gravity back in the 60's & 70's.
    • Jack Sarfatti "The second class of quantum algorithm outperforms its classical counterpart by using superposition and entangled states. Shor’s factoring algorithm [34] (which uses the Quantum Fourier Transform (QFT)) and Grover’s quantum search algorithm [14] are the primary known algorithms in this class. A very useful outcome of the present research would be to create programming tools to aid in designing both classes of algorithms."
    • Jack Sarfatti Homework Problem Set 1: find out details on QFT & Grover's algorithm.
    • Jack Sarfatti "A physical implementation of the currently largest (seven qubit) quantum computer was reported by the Los Alamos National Labs (LANL) in March 2000 [18], only 18 months after the first three qubit machine was reported (using Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) and customized molecules). Early in 2002, IBM announced Shor’s algorithm factored the number 15 into factors three and five, running on a seven qubit NMR quantum computer. Nanodots
      (single 3D-confined quantum states) and nanomolecules (4-5 coupled nanodots) are the long term hope for quantum computers because they represent the continuation of contemporary semiconductor-based scaling methodology into the quantum computing domain."
    • Jack Sarfatti See also Kitaev on anyonic topological quantum computing with string theory braiding implemented in fractional quantum Hall effect? Still a dream.
    • Jack Sarfatti Hameroff's protein dimers wrapped around the micro-tubules are our "quantum nano dots".
    • Jack Sarfatti "Quantum computation follows an algorithm or recipe of operations, starting with initializing the qubits to known states. At the end of evolving the system state using a programmed sequence of operators, the final evolved state must be measured to produce the answer, which has the side effect of destroying the coherent information represented in the evolved state. This measurement process is called a projection, because the high dimensional states are reduced to a single classical bit vector result inside the measurement apparatus. Anywhere during this process, noise can also modify the system state, acting like an unwanted operator or measurement. For these reasons, redundancy of state with error correction techniques has been successfully applied to the evolution of quantum states. Designing quantum computers and algorithms is still in its infancy, but significant
      engineering progress has been made over the last ten years."
    • Jack Sarfatti Aharonov's weak measurements with back-from-the-future post-selection are a new dimension to the above narrative based only on Von Neuman's strong projection operator measurements. Weak measurements are not irreversible. Strong measurements are. Combining both in clever ways as Aephraim Steinberg has done in Toronto gives new precision techniques useful to the coming quantum computer technology. CIA & Lockheed already using primitive D-Wave quantum chips like Apple's first LISA.
  2. Places
    See All
    10 Recent Places

    Jack Sarfatti was at Lombards Street - Most Crooked Street and 9 other places.
    See All Stories
    • Jack Sarfatti "CHAPTER 2
      THE UNIVERSE IS A QUANTUM COMPUTER
      The universe is really a very large extended quantum simulation [12] whose outcome is the classical world view we experience around us. This fact is accepted because the inverse scenario is impossible, since classical computers cannot efficiently simulate quantum mechanical systems. Even empty space and black holes are filled by invisible, nonphysical quantum states (or zero-point energy), which represent a very high-dimensional quantum foam or ether that can only be observed as a small projection into our 4D spacetime."
    • Jack Sarfatti "This accepted understanding means that quantum states are protophysical [28], since they are more fundamental than classical entities such as space, time, energy, or matter. This idea agrees with the “big bang” theory of cosmic evolution in which quantum states existed before classical features appeared. Since primitive quantum states encode (or are) information, information is primitive and the start of the universe represents a quantum “bit bang” [23]."
    • Jack Sarfatti Yes, I have been saying this for years.
    • Jack Sarfatti These ideas are catching on.
    • Jack Sarfatti "Black holes are therefore bit buckets, due to the combined laws of thermodynamics, quantum mechanics, gravity, and information theory. The surface area of the black hole is known as its event horizon (or entropy, measured in bits), and represents the boundary between our physical 4D spacetime and the quantum dimensions inside (that form the singularity)."
    • ‎+ Brief History http://t.co/McSGFHBv
      lnkd.in
      I began work in the field of atomic astrophysics, and worked on the problem of di-electronic recombination in the solar corona. I then moved into cosmology, and the theory of black holes, especially their quantum and thermodynamic properties. During the 1970's and 1980's I helped develop the theory …