Blog
On Mar 29, 2011, at 6:17 PM, JACK SARFATTI wrote:
When I combine Bohm's quantum potential with Cramer's and Aharonov's, the condition for non-unitary signal nonlocality is simply the failure of the destiny and history action phases S to match. It's trivial. This gives a (non-unitary) imaginary dissipative contribution to the quantum potential Q.
I am writing up the details. It's very simple. I will put it in the cosmology consciousness article.
Basically psi = Re^iS
The NR quantum potential is
Q ~ R^-1Del^2R
But what R should really be is
R = |psi(history)psi(destiny)| = {|psi(history)||psi(destiny)|e^i[S(history)-S(destiny)}^1/2
&S = S(history)-S(destiny)
R --> R* = {|psi(history)||psi(destiny)|}^1/2[cos&S/2 + isin&S/2]
in orthodox quantum theory with signal locality the imaginary part of R* vanishes.
From string theory's financial derivatives to ....? ;-)
They are known as "quants" because they do quantitative finance. Seduced by a vision of mathematical elegance underlying some of the messiest of human activities, they apply skills they once hoped to use to untangle string theory or the nervous system to making money.
Derman, Overbye noted, "fell in love with a corner of finance that dealt with stock options."
"Options theory is kind of deep in some way. It was very elegant; it had the quality of physics" Derman told him.
— JB
http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/derman10.1/derman10.1_index.html
"'There is a vast market for ever-faster fibre-optic cables to try to physically "get there faster"'but Dr Wissner-Gross said that the purely technological approach to gaining an advantage was reaching a limit.
Trades now travel at nearly 90% of the ultimate speed limit set by physics, the speed of light in the cables.
Competitive advantage
His first solution, published in 2010, considered the various latencies in global fibre-optic links and mapped out where the optimal points for financial transactions to originate - midway between two major financial hubs to maximise the chance of "buying low" in one place and 'selling high' in another."
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-12827752?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter
Bye, bye, orthodox quantum theory. Where there is a will there is a way. ;-)
Subquantum Information and Computation
Antony Valentini
(Submitted on 11 Mar 2002 (v1), last revised 12 Apr 2002 (this version, v2))
It is argued that immense physical resources - for nonlocal communication, espionage, and exponentially-fast computation - are hidden from us by quantum noise, and that this noise is not fundamental but merely a property of an equilibrium state in which the universe happens to be at the present time. It is suggested that 'non-quantum' or nonequilibrium matter might exist today in the form of relic particles from the early universe. We describe how such matter could be detected and put to practical use. Nonequilibrium matter could be used to send instantaneous signals, to violate the uncertainty principle, to distinguish non-orthogonal quantum states without disturbing them, to eavesdrop on quantum key distribution, and to outpace quantum computation (solving NP-complete problems in polynomial time).
http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0203049
A Richter 9 is 1000 x more energy released than Richter 7.
However, the swing amplitude is only 100x bigger. People get confused on the distinction.
(energy ratio) = (amplitude ratio)^3/2
amplitude ratio is 10^(difference of the Richter readings).
No quake at Richter 10 ever happened and it is alleged to be planet destroying. It's only about 32x more energy than the Japan quake.
Breaking News Alert
The New York Times
Mon, March 14, 2011 -- 8:00 PM ET
-----
"An explosion early Tuesday morning may have damaged the inner steel containment vessel of the No. 2 reactor at Japan's Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station, leading to the wide release of radioactive materials there ..."
It says "may have". However, it does not look good.
"After the Three Mile Island nuclear accident, the NRC detected radioactive iodine in local milk at levels of 20 picocuries/liter,[6] a dose much less than one would receive from ingesting a single banana. Thus a 12 fl oz glass of the slightly radioactive milk would have about 1/75th BED (banana equivalent dose)."
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/02/16/going-bananas-over-radiation/
I was just on the Michael Savage radio show 3-14-11 talking about this.
My main message to his millions of listeners across America and beyond was:
Keep calm and carry on! ;-)
A UC Berkeley nuclear engineer called after me and confirmed my position - not to worry too much about radiation hazards in our neck of the woods.
Of course things may change. He says that no containment breaches as yet.
I did not call the show. Michael's producer called me and asked me to come on it as a guest.
I spoke about
http://theenergycollective.com/barrybrook/53461/fukushima-nuclear-accident-simple-and-accurate-explanation
and
http://www.orau.org/ptp/collection/accidents/ki.htm
"The energy release of an earthquake, which closely correlates to its destructive power, scales with the 3⁄2 power of the shaking amplitude. Thus, a difference in magnitude of 1.0 is equivalent to a factor of 31.6 ( = (101.0)(3 / 2)) in the energy released; a difference in magnitude of 2.0 is equivalent to a factor of 1000 ( = (102.0)(3 / 2) ) in the energy released.[2]"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richter_magnitude_scale
The formulas (1a & b) and their consequences below are my original discoveries today March 13, 2011 Pacific Time to which I and my estate retain all commercial/technology rights that may ensue.
On Mar 13, 2011, at 8:13 PM, JACK SARFATTI wrote:
Bottom line, for a thin spherical shell capacitor filled with appropriate meta-material of thickness d << Area A of concentric shells - the anomalous Newtonian g-force field just outside the outer electrically charged spherical shell should be of order of magnitude
g(anomalous repulsion) = c^2rs(applied EM field)/r^2
~ (index of refraction)^4G(-E^2d/c^2 (1a)
"(-" = negative meta-material permittivity
Therefore, without the "superconducting" index to the fourth power amplification we cannot hope to nullify g(Earth) ~ 10 meters/sec^2 with practical small amounts of applied electric field/voltage gradient between the inner and outer spherical shells filled with a properly designed meta-material.
Let V = voltage difference across the "plates" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capacitor
C = Q/V
+ & - Q = charges on the plates
C = capacitance
V ~ Ed
~ (index of refraction)^4G(-V^2/dc^2
~ (index of refraction)^4G(-Q^2/C^2dc^2
Also from Maxwell's equations
index of refraction ~ (permittivity)^1/2 - for fixed permeability.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permittivity
Therefore, the anomalous Newtonian gravity radial g-force field at the surface of the outer sphere is
~ (permittivity)^3(Newton's Gravity Constant)(Voltage Difference)^2/(distance between plates)(speed of light in vacuum)^2 (1b)
To get the right ELF resonance put a coil across the capacitor.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LC_circuit
PS, I got the idea to use meta-materials from the Project JASON meeting on HFGW I attended at General Atomics in La Jolla June 2008 I think it was.
JASON Defense Advisory Panel: Reports on Defense Science and ...
JASON typically performs most of its work during an annual summer study, and has conducted studies under contract to the Department of Defense (frequently ...
www.fas.org/irp/agency/dod/jason/
JASON (advisory group) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
JASON typically performs most of its work during an annual summer study. Its sponsors include the Department of Defense (frequently DARPA and the United ...
Activities - Membership - Recent history - Research
Up till then I did not know what a meta-material was, but a lot of Navy scientists at the meeting were excited about it. All the recent progress in meta-material like reverse Doppler sounding like the Vallee-Torme Fastwalker leads me to wonder if it's not the Phil Corso scenario? ;-)
On Mar 13, 2011, at 6:58 PM, jfwoodward@ ...wrote:
You've missed my point (perhaps intentionally).
No. I get a precise formula below in the spherical case that is easy to calculate to illustrate the essential concept. Flat plates harder to do instantly back of the envelope.
Yes, it may not be possible to produce large gravitational shifts of the sort you describe. But the EP requires that if you produce a change in the active (or passive) gravitational mass, you also produce a change in the inertial mass.
Yes, but I am totally against that approach for several reasons.
1) The only way to do that is with the Higgs field. Lenny Susskind discusses why that is not practical and even if you did it it would be catastrophic in my opinion because of the delicate balances e/m et-al.
2) Warp drive is geodesic, i.e. the inertial mass of the ship drops out of the equation (to first approximation i.e. center of mass of an extended object)
It may be small, but since you can produce effectively artificial gravity fields by accelerating the changed mass with external forces with decades of "gs", that small change in mass can have detectable results.
Again I say it's not relevant for the zero g-force propellantless propulsion I am after, and even dangerous if, by chance, you succeeded say with your Mach idea device.
Our Final Hour - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Sir Martin Rees, Our Final Hour: A Scientist's Warning: How Terror, Error, and Environmental Disaster Threaten Humankind's Future In This Century—On Earth ...
Humanity's fate and ... - Reviews - Further reading - See also
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Our_Final_Hour
PIXELSURGEON | Reviews | Books | Our Final Hour: A Scientist's Warning
In the first of a trilogy of reviews for Pixelsurgeon, Brian Reindel looks at the scientific basis for the end of Mankind. His first review is of a book ...
www.pixelsurgeon.com/reviews/review.php?id=626
Our Final Hour: A Scientist's Warning | kurzweilai
Jul 14, 2010 ... Amazon | Nano-machines stand poised to revolutionize technology and medicine, but what happens if these minuscule beasties break their leash ...
www.kurzweilai.net/our-final-hour-a-scientists-warning
Review of "Just Six Numbers"
Nov 20, 2006 ... Just Six Numbers: the deep forces that shape the universe, by Martin Rees. ISBN 0-75381-022-0. The laws of nature seem to have too many ...
www.mccaughan.org.uk/g/books/rees.html -
Just Six Numbers Review
Just Six Numbers Sir Martin Rees The Astronomer Royal speculates about the ... ( extract from Simon Singh's review, Daily Telegraph, 7 January 1999) ...
www.simonsingh.net/Just_Six_Numbers_Review.html - Cached - Similar
Book Review: The Constants of Nature and Just Six Numbers, Volume ...
by BE Blank - 2004 - Cited by 1 - Related articles
NOTICES OF THE AMS. VOLUME 51, NUMBER 10. Book Review. The Constants of Nature and. Just Six Numbers. Reviewed by Brian E. Blank. The Constants of Nature ...
www.ams.org/notices/200410/rev-blank.pdf - Similar
So, instead of the concentric sphere geometry you mention, how about something as simple as a disk capacitor with parallel plates, say a few centimeters in diameter? Maybe a multiplate design if you want to increase the strength of the E field in the gap between the plates. Describe the stuff you want to put between the plates to produce the exotic matter you claim should be possible. I'll build it and give it a try.
No exotic matter is involved here. Meta-materials. This is not a one-man job. Large numbers of scientists in different fields would be needed to pull this off. Lots of new physics needed here. The data Jacques Vallee put into the novel Fastwalker suggest meta-material to me.
On Mar 13, 2011, at 3:51 PM, JACK SARFATTI wrote:
Bottom line, for a thin spherical shell capacitor filled with appropriate meta-material of thickness d << Area A of concentric shells - the anomalous Newtonian g-force field just outside the outer electrically charged spherical shell should be of order of magnitude
g(anomalous repulsion) = c^2rs(applied EM field)/r^2
~ (index of refraction)^4G(-E^2d/c^2
"(-" = negative meta-material permittivity
Therefore, without the "superconducting" index to the fourth power amplification we cannot hope to nullify g(Earth) ~ 10 meters/sec^2 with practical small amounts of applied electric field E (voltage gradient) between the inner and outer spherical shells filled with a properly designed meta-material.
Bottom line, for a thin spherical shell capacitor filled with appropriate meta-material of thickness d << Area A of concentric shells - the anomalous Newtonian g-force field just outside the outer electrically charged spherical shell should be of order of magnitude
g(anomalous repulsion) = c^2rs(applied EM field)/r^2
r ~ A^1/2
~ (index of refraction)^4G(-E^2d/c^2
(- = negative permittivity
Therefore, without the index to the fourth power amplification we cannot hope to nullify g(Earth) ~ 10 meters/sec^2 with practical small amounts of applied electric field/voltage gradient between the inner and outer spherical shells filled with a properly designed meta-material.
On Mar 12, 2011, at 10:17 PM, jfwoodward wrote:
Well, certainly the metamaterial is worth testing. And producing as much exoticity as possible makes sense. But reducing c (as in a superconductor) I don't think will matter much.
I disagree. If we cannot greatly reduce "c" via a Bose-Einstein condensate and/or http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slow_light enormous increase of index of refraction I don't think there is a chance it will work. Could be wrong of course - and it may not work because my basic Ansatz may not be true - empirical issue, but these are desperate times and we should try everything not obviously not even wrong.
You are thinking that by reducing c, m (= E/c^2) will be increased I'll bet.
My idea is motivated by Sakharov 1967 that gravity is an emergent macroscopic IR effective c-number field from the electro-weak-strong forces and sources as a substrate as VIRTUAL quanta inside the physical vacuum.
My idea is motivated by
Bose–Einstein condensate - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - 3 visits - 1:36pm
Bose first sent a paper to Einstein on the quantum statistics of light ..... from Bose condensates confined to one dimension, and the slowing of light ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bose–Einstein_condensate - Cached - Similar
?
Physicists Slow Speed of Light
Feb 18, 1999 ... "However, slowing light can certainly help our understanding of the bizarre state of matter of a Bose-Einstein condensate," Hau points out. ...
www.news.harvard.edu/gazette/1999/02.18/light.html - Cached - Similar
[PDF] Ultra-slow, stopped, and compressed light in Bose-Einstein condensates
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat
by Z Dutton - 2002 - Cited by 6 - Related articles
ultra-slow light in Bose-Einstein condensates quite generally. It is first ...
www.physics.harvard.edu/Thesespdfs/dutton.pdf - Similar
Show more results from harvard.edu
Harvard Physicist Plays Magician With the Speed of Light
Oct 23, 2007... is a 0.1-mm lump of atoms called a Bose-Einstein condensate, ... Her first trick was slowing a pulse of light to a crawl — 15 mph as it ...
www.wired.com/science/discoveries/magazine/.../st_alphageek - Cached - Similar
Ultraslow Light & Bose-Einstein Condensates
by C Slowe - 2005 - Cited by 9 - Related articles
ULTRA-SLOW LIGHT & BOSE-EINSTEIN CONDENSATES. Figure 2. (a) Direct observation of the slowing and spatial compression of a light pulse in ...
www.opticsinfobase.org/viewmedia.cfm?uri=OPN-16-5-30&seq=0
Slow light and the phase of a Bose-Einstein condensate
by P Öhberg - 2002
Slow light and the phase of a Bose-Einstein condensate. P Öhberg Physical Review A 66:22, 21603, American Physical Society, 8/2002.
link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.66.021603
and Einstein's field equation that I conjecture is, in a material,
Guv(gravity) + [8pi(index of refraction)^4G/c^4]Tuv(applied EM field) = 0
But I don't think that changing c by an index of refraction makes any difference as c in m = E/c^2 is the vacuum speed of light (not whatever it may be in some material medium). As I said, reducing c can increase the energy density (as the stuff traveling at c gets stacked up if you will as it passes into the refracting medium), but it cannot change the total energy (which is compressed into a smaller volume in the refracting medium but not changed in total amount).
But let's say I'm wrong about the c issue. Thinking in terms of non-transparent media, you don't need a superconductor. Think in terms of materials with very large dielectric constants. 10^3 is easy. That's the k of ferroelectric materials. And I've heard that ks of 10^6 are possible. It's not 10^10. But it should be more than enough for the purpose. . . .
Update on
On Mar 12, 2011, at 5:13 PM, JACK SARFATTI wrote:
The capacitor has to have negative permittivity at DC or at least at ELF range.
But that's not good enough to measure anomalous repulsive gravity if the effective index of refraction is normal ~ 1
The important thing we want to measure is (index of refraction)^4G/c(vacuum)^4
to test my conjecture
Guv + [(index of refraction)^4G/c(vacuum)^4(E.D)] = 0
inside a material despite apparent breaking of general covariance
D = (permittivity)E
The effective induced radius of curvature R is
1/R^2 ~ (index of refraction)^4G/c(vacuum)^4(E.D)
comparing to an idealized spherical mass equivalent
rs/r^3 = 1/R^2 ~ curvature estimate for Guv in Einstein's equation in the meta-material spherical shell region where Tuv =/= 0
rs/r^3 ~ [(index of refraction)^4G/c(vacuum)^4](E.D)
What is rs here?
We need to take the total EM field SOURCE energy in the "capacitor" on the RHS, divide by c^2 etc.
From that we compute r self-consistently.
E.D = (-E^2
(- = electrical permittivity that we want negative in an ELF band in a spherical thin shell capacitor filled with a meta-material of volume V that is also superconducting at high Tc.
The total non-radiative near field ELF electric field mass-energy M (neglect magnetic part in first approximation)
M = (-E^2V/c^2
Therefore, assuming a spherically symmetric shell "capacitor" of thickness d and area A, V = Ad with E ~ constant inside the thin shell
d << A^1/2 (neglecting 4pi etc for now)
rs = 2GM/c^2 = (index of refraction)^4G(-E^2Ad/c^4
and
r ~ A^1/2
so in vacuum just outside the shell of the spherical capacitor
g(anomalous) = c^2rs/r^2 ~ (index of refraction)^4G(-E^2d/c^2
The effective static LNIF anomalous g-force is then c^2rs/r^2 to compare with local Earth g of 10meters/sec^2
Unless we can get (index of refraction) way up to ~ 10^10 in the relevant frequency band I doubt we will be able to measure anything.
Clearly, this theoretical issue needs to be more carefully studied first - this is only off the cuff back of envelope sort of hand waving.