I suppose the 10^-17 cm inference from the raw data comes from only looking at the elastic scattering piece of the amplitude so that no real electron-positron pairs are created in that sub-sample?
On May 28, 2011, at 12:43 AM, email@example.com wrote: That doesn't sound right. The dressing virtual e/p pairs do not have a diameter of 10^-11 cm (the Compton wavelength). If they did, the charge distribution would show up in lepton-lepton scattering experiments. But they show no charge distribution down to about 10^-17 cm as I recall. Electrons are very much smaller than the Compton wavelength. I put in 10^-11cm only because momentum transfers in inelastic scattering > h/10^-11 cm excite real e+-e- pairs out of the virtual plasma cloud. Of course you are correct about the form-factor measurements at the 10^-17 cm scale. Therefore, a very careful look at how Imperial is interpreting their data is in order. I have not done so of course - major job for others. We also need to bear in mind how the Bohm interpretation would apply to the new data. Also remember if my picture of strong short range gravity applies there are severe space distortions so that a large extended Bohm hidden variable sphere of charge will "shrink" in a high energy scattering! e.g. dR = dr(1 - rs/r)^-1/2 whilst circumference C = 2pir hence ratio of C/R ---> 0 as r --> rs in a scattering. From: JACK SARFATTI To: "firstname.lastname@example.org woodward" Cc: Subject: Re: Electron is near perfect sphere? Good news for Bohmians from Imperial College, London? (Dr. Quantum) Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 23:39:30 -0700 From: JACK SARFATTI Date: May 27, 2011 11:39:30 PM PDT To: Subject: Re: Electron is near perfect sphere? Good news for Bohmians from Imperial College, London? (Dr. Quantum) PS the work at Imperial is trying to find an electric dipole moment of the electron viewed as a distortion in the virtual electron-positron-photon plasma ball of order h/mc ~ 10^-11 cm. On May 27, 2011, at 9:52 AM, JACK SARFATTI wrote: On May 26, 2011, at 11:34 PM, email@example.com wrote: Ah! At last. Yes, getting semi-classical electrons right is pivotal in exotic physics. . . . :-) Yes, however I need to fix my sloppy algebra yesterday done in haste, I think I switch sign conventions mid-way and it's not correct at the "stability" part, but the conclusion is. Basically, if you use convention force = - Grad potential + e^2/r has Grad = -e^2/r^2 and the force is +e^2/r^2 repulsive pointing away from r = 0. forgetting factors of m, c etc for now If we also use - / ^2 for the potential then its Grad is - 2/ so the force ~ + 2/
repulsive for / > 0 i.e. as in de Sitter metric g00 = 1 - / ^2 with a future event horizon at / ^2 = 1 in this static LNIF rep where we are at r = 0. this is also the interior of George Chapline's dark star that I independently thought of BTW attractive for / < 0 as in anti de Sitter metric without an event horizon. it's the anti de Sitter case that is the Poincare stress strong zero point energy induced gravity glue opposing the self-repulsion of the extended hollow shell of electric charge. v2 corrected! PS a simple classical model Old classical model The self-energy electrical potential energy of the extended electron of radius a is Vself = +xe^2/a > 0 x is a model-dependent dimensionless number of order unity This is obviously unstable. Add the virtual particle interior to the shell of charge e and rest mass m, this is a dimensionless effective potential per unit test mass energy We now have a quantum corrected semi-classical effective potential V(r) = Vself + VQM = +xe^2/mc^2r - / ^2 (note we can also consider a |/|^1/2 r term with a constant "force" as in the accelerating universe, but it has a vanishing 2nd derivative) the critical point is dV/dr = 0 -xe^2/mc^2r^2 - 2/ = 0 i.e. using the classical electron radius re = e^2/mc^2 -xre /r^2 - 2/ = 0 -xre - 2/a^3 = 0 2/ = -xre /a^3 a^3 = -xre /2/ check the stability d^2V/dr^2 = 2xre/a^3 + 2/ = -4/ + 2/ = -2/ stability requires / < 0, i.e. second derivative must be positive for stability in this function of a single real variable r we can also put in "spin" as a dimensionless centrifugal potential in the rotating frame ~ (J/mc^2)^2r^-2 etc.
http://redstarfilms.blogspot.com/2011/05/hal-puthoff-on-remote-viewing-and.html Much is still classified. This is a very important video. Further info is in MIT Physics Professor David Kaiser's book "How The Hippies Saved Physics." Note that my paper allegedly vetted by Roger Penrose explains the physical basis for remote viewing, i.e., signal nonlocality. http://journalofcosmology.com/SarfattiConsciousness.pdf
Susskind writes in
SU-ITP-93-15 June 1993 hep-th/9306069 The Stretched Horizon and Black Hole Complementarity Leonard Susskind, L´arus Thorlacius,† and John Uglum
"We argue that a phenomenological description of black holes, based on the idea of a “stretched horizon,' which can absorb, thermalize, and re-emit information, is consistent with these postulates."
Note word "absorb." In the case of our future event horizon the re-emission must be Wheeler-Feynman advanced waves in the sense of the Cramer transaction.
Note in this case there is an "infinite" blueshift at the future event horizon absorber for the retarded wave that redshifts back to the emitter frequency in the advanced wave in a self-consistent time loop.
"Although we shall not introduce specific postulates about observers who fall through the global event horizon, there is a widespread belief which we fully share. The belief is based on the equivalence principle and the fact that the global event horizon of a very massive black hole does not have large curvature, energy density, pressure, or any other invariant signal of its presence. For this reason, it seems certain that a freely falling observer experiences nothing out of the ordinary when crossing the horizon."
This belief becomes questionable if there is an actual plasma at the horizon induced by the interaction of photons on null geodesics with the virtual particles stuck to the horizon. Same would apply to massive particles on timelike geodesics. The existence of a real plasma would be locally frame invariant. A similar issue arises in George Chapline's dark star model that looks like a black hole to the exterior observers.
Subject: Re: Electron is near perfect sphere? Good news for Bohmians from Imperial College, London? (Dr. Quantum)On May 26, 2011, at 11:34 PM, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:Ah! At last. Yes, getting semi-classical electrons right is pivotal in exotic physics. . . . :-)Yes, however I need to fix my sloppy algebra yesterday done in haste, I think I switch sign conventions mid-way and it's not correct at the "stability" part, but the conclusion is.
Basically, if you use convention force = - Grad potential+ e^2/r has Grad = -e^2/r^2 and the force is +e^2/r^2 repulsive pointing away from r = 0.forgetting factors of m, c etc for nowIf we also use - /
^2 for the potentialthen its Grad is - 2/
so the force ~ + 2/
repulsive for / > 0 i.e. as in de Sitter metric g00 = 1 - /
^2 with a future event horizon at /
^2 = 1 in this static LNIF rep where we are at r = 0.this is also the interior of George Chapline's dark star that I independently thought of BTWattractive for / < 0 as in anti de Sitter metric without an event horizon.it's the anti de Sitter case that is the Poincare stress strong zero point energy induced gravity glue opposing the self-repulsion of the extended hollow shell of electric charge.v2 corrected!PS a simple classical modelOld classical modelThe self-energy electrical potential energy of the extended electron of radius a isVself = +xe^2/a > 0x is a model-dependent dimensionless number of order unityThis is obviously unstable.Add the virtual particle interior to the shell of charge e and rest mass m, this is a dimensionless effective potential per unit test mass energyWe now have a quantum corrected semi-classical effective potentialV(r) = Vself + VQM = +xe^2/mc^2r - /
^2(note we can also consider a |/|^1/2 r term with a constant "force" as in the accelerating universe, but it has a vanishing 2nd derivative)the critical point isdV/dr = 0-xe^2/mc^2r^2 - 2/
= 0i.e. using the classical electron radiusre = e^2/mc^2-xre /r^2 - 2/
= 0-xre - 2/a^3 = 02/ = -xre /a^3a^3 = -xre /2/check the stabilityd^2V/dr^2 = 2xre/a^3 + 2/ = -4/ + 2/ = -2/stability requires / < 0, i.e. second derivative must be positive for stability in this function of a single real variable rwe can also put in "spin" as a dimensionless centrifugal potential in the rotating frame ~ (J/mc^2)^2r^-2 etc.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxima_and_minimaPlease note: message attachedFrom: JACK SARFATTI <email@example.com>To: Jonathan Post <firstname.lastname@example.org>Cc:
Subject: Re: Electron is near perfect sphere? Good news for Bohmians from Imperial College, London?Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 17:15:35 -0700From: JACK SARFATTI <email@example.com>Date: May 26, 2011 5:15:35 PM PDTTo: Jonathan Post <firstname.lastname@example.org>Cc: david kaiser <dikaiser@MIT.EDU>, "email@example.com woodward" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Hal Puthoff <Puthoff@aol.com>, Saul-Paul Sirag <email@example.com>, Creon Levit <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Bernard J Carr <b.j.Carr@qmul.ac.uk>, Basil Hiley <email@example.com>, Sharon Weinberger <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Gary Bekkum <email@example.com>, Sinziana Paduroiu <firstname.lastname@example.org>Subject: Re: Electron is near perfect sphere? Good news for Bohmians from Imperial College, London?On May 26, 2011, at 3:47 PM, JACK SARFATTI wrote:No that is no longer true once quantum gravity effects are included. I talk about it in my Journal of Cosmology article that Penrose allegedly vetted. Sure what you say was the case CLASSICALLY that's the famous problem that I claim I have solved.Virtual fermion-antifermion pairs gravitate strongly enough on the Compton scale to counter-act the self-repulsion of the classical shell of electric charge.Of course virtual bosons will anti-gravitate so in order for this scheme to work the density of virtual fermion pairs must exceed the density of the virtual bosons.My model is similar to George Chapline's dark star on the macro-scale. He has repulsive dark energy (virtual bosons dominate) interior to the event horizon. In contrast, I have attractive dark matter (virtual fermion-antifermion pairs dominate) interior to the classical shell of charge.On May 26, 2011, at 2:34 PM, Jonathan Post wrote:I've published a refereed paper about why spherical shells or spherical cloud electrons don't work, as was well known early in the 20th century. To be blunt:(1) each negative part repels each other negative part, and they explode;well known - that's the classical Abraham-Lorentz-Poincare stress problem.(2) when you use classical electromagnetism to see what happens when the shell or cloud is accelerated by a force, you get a differential equation that forces you to "pre-accelerate" the electron before t=0 just to be able to get displacement, velocity, and acceleration to agree with F=mA. That is, you get a mess that required a third derivative of displacement with respect to time. More terms just make things worse.Yes of course, this is well known from Dirac e.g. Hoyle-Narlikar papers.(3) It is a dirty little secret that vexed Schrodinger, Dirac, Einstein et al,. -- there is no workable semiclassical theory of the electron.There is now.Then Feynman invented QED and, as I say, the problem vanished. But the electrons must be true points. Zero radius.Not any more. That's the conventional wisdom that is wrong.
The single most interesting feature of attempts to replace dark matter with a modification of gravity is Milgrom’s discovery that in a wide variety of galaxies, there’s a unique place where ordinary gravity plus ordinary matter stops working: when the acceleration due to gravity (as Newton would have calculated it) drops below a fixed value a0 ≈ 10−10 m/s2. This is the basis of MOND, but the pattern itself is arguably more interesting than any current attempt to account for it. Very possibly it can be explained by the complicated dynamics of baryons and dark matter in galaxies — but in any event it should be explained somehow.
The existence of this feature gives a strong motivation for testing gravity in the regime of very tiny accelerations. Note that this isn’t even a statement that makes sense in general relativity; particles move on geodesics, and the “acceleration due to gravity” is always exactly zero. So implicitly we’re imagining some global inertial frame with respect to which such acceleration can be measured. That’s a job for a future theory to make sense of; for the moment we’re forgetting that we know GR and thinking like Newton would have.
So now Hernandez, Jimenez, and Allen have tried to test gravity in this weak-acceleration regime — and they claim it fails!
Star Gate Back From The Future The Second Quantum and Relativity Revolutions From radioactivity to retroactivity. Jack Sarfatti A memoir and essays by and about the strange adventures of a radical conservative theatrical physicist trapped in our destiny matrix holographic virtual reality multiverse of time loops and space twists. Including a new paper by Fred Alan Wolf American Book Award Author Taking The Quantum Leap
Foreword 6 Jackie at Cornell in the late 1950’s by David Green 10 Slim Virgin’s History “Jack Sarfatti” 19 Background 20 Education 20 Academic career 21 Research, ideas, and reception 21 Fundamental Physics Group 21 Research into Uri Geller 23 Physics-Consciousness Research Group 25 Publication and research outside academia 26 DARPA/NASA 100 Year Star Ship Study 30 Man on a Pendulum by Colin Bennett 31 The Book 38 Escape from Destiny’s Matrix 43 Back From the Future 44 Marinetti’s Futurist Manifesto Resurrected in Post-Modern Physics 47 The Divine Invasion: Did Wheeler’s IT Come From The Future BIT? 50 The Once and Future Hologram Mind of GOD 52 Is it the secret meaning of the Free Mason Symbol? 52 The Destiny of the Universe 56 Decoding The Cipher of Genesis 57 How the Hippies Saved Physics 59 Weird Science by Alex Burns, 21C (1996) 63 Master of the Vortex 64 Encounters with VALIS 69 Into the Pandemonium 73 SDI: Rust In Peace 76 Victory at Sea 80 Strange Loops and God-Phones 80 ‘Who is Number One?’ 82 Unlocking the ‘Destiny Matrix’ 84 Quantum Physics and the ‘Meanings of Life’ 87 The Non-Lethal Warfare Imperative 89 Parallel Universes In Collision 93 The Beatnik Physicist by Tony Gantner, 2011 94 Sarfatti’s Spark by Rina Shelly Orid, 2011 102 Stephen Hawking’s Grand Design or Grand Illusion? 104 Tony Gantner continued 105 Intelligent Design, Good, Bad or Bogus? 108 Flying Saucer Physics: Covert Black Ops, Zero Point Energy, Anti-Gravity? 110 Paul Hill’s book on Flying Saucers (early 1950’s) 110 Foreword to Report on UFOs by Edward J. Ruppelt, 1955 113 October Sky 1953 - Merlin’s Super Kids 124 The Mists of Avalon 133 Photo of Glastonbury by Hank Harrison 134 Rina Shelly Orid Lost in The Mist 134 The Michelangelo Code 139 Bob Toben, Fred Alan Wolf Space-Time & Beyond 141 Jean Cocteau, French Surrealism meets Italian Futurism 144 Brendan O’Regan, CIA’s SRI Remote Viewing 145 Dr. Kardec, Baphomet and The Knights Templar 147 Solomon ha-Zarfati AKA Rashi de Troyes (1040-1105) 154 Cabalist Carlo Suares 156 (Balthazar of Durrell’s “The Alexandria Quartet”) 156 The Woman and The Child 160 Psi Wars! Uri Geller, Dennis Bardens, Her Majesty’s Secret Service 161 “Dr. Sarfatti, may I take you to dinner?” 162 Does the World Hang Perilously on Stretched G-Strings? 164 Enigma of the point particle 166 Vibrating Strings and Branes in 11 Dimensions? 168 Afternoon of The Magicians 172 My World Line: The Tibetan Connection 172 The Cradle Will Rock: Tea With Benito Mussolini’s Mentor Margherita Sarfatti 175 The Pope’s Jew 177 The Occult Third Reich 179 Hitler’s 1923 suicide attempt foiled at last moment! 182 Ciao! Manhattan 186 Alleged Jewish Sarfatti Ancestory of Queen Victoria According to Martin Dunn-Sarfatti 191 Post-Inflation Emergent Hologram Gravity 198 IT FROM BIT 199 CIA's not so 'fair game' of spies, lies, and fMRIs? by Gary S. Bekkum 212 Herbert Gold’s Bohemia 230 John Updike allegedly got into the act 231 Causality-Violating Quantum Action-at-a-Distance Lecture at SFSU 235 Making Star Trek Real 238 ISSO Research in the Physics of Consciousness 242 Henry Stapp’s Bohr-Heisenberg idealistic model of presponse 245 Jack Sarfatti’s Bohmian realistic model of presponse 245 Space-time approach to non-relativistic quantum mechanics 246 Reviews of Modern Physics, Vol. 20, p. 267 (1948), Feynman 246 The Cat’s Cradle Principle: Collision of History with Destiny 249 Epilogue Back From the Future 257 Physics Today: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly 259 Nobel Physics Laureate Brian Josephson’s “How To Run A Conference.” 264 Jack Sarfatti and the Shadows on the Wall by Alan Waite 267 GroupThink and the Myth of the Cave 268 Science and the Cost of Discipleship 269 Sarfatti and The Cave 275 Jack Sarfatti and the Breaking of Chains 283 Valentini Towler Conference Controversy: Shadows on the Wall 292 Science, Integrity and Mythos 303 Transcript of the Interview 309 Physics Notes 356 Intelligent Design? 366 From Eternity Back to Here-Now 368 Holographic Universe Conjecture 372 Consciousness in the Universe 380 A brief history of my contributions to acausality in quantum physics by Fred Alan Wolf 381 Have Scientists Finally Discovered Evidence for Psychic Phenomena? 381 Retrocausality and Signal Nonlocality in Consciousness & Cosmology 405 Emergent M-Matrix Gravity 433 End Notes 445
Flying Saucers Over the White House
A Biography of Edward J. Ruppelt,
a Man the Government Didn't Want You to Know
“Do aliens exist?”
It's one of the big questions of our lifetimes and was already answered in the 1950s by Edward J. Ruppelt, when he stated:
"We found out that UFOs frequently visited Washington. …fifty targets had been tracked from 8:00PM till midnight."
Edward J. Ruppelt was not just an ordinary citizen. He was a U.S. Army Air Force officer and the first person connected with the U.S. government to seriously research the subject of extraterrestrial life. The U.S. government
appointed him to lead “Project Blue Book” in the early 1950s, which was the official U.S. Air Force investigation into the UFO phenomenon.
British author and UFO researcher Colin Bennett wrote Flying Saucers Over the White House, a unique biography about Ruppelt, which is for the first time being released in the U.S.by Cosimo Books.
In this biography, Bennett not only describes Ruppelt’s life as a military man and UFO investigator, but examines his UFO findings, the military industrial complex surrounding his research and the subsequent alleged military cover-up of his conclusions.
This biography is indispensable reading for UFO fans, anyone interested in the fascinating life of Edward J. Ruppelt, and citizens who want to understand how governments can initiate investigations but suppress the implications when the results are unfavorable. Now sixty years since Ruppelt’s research, as we are still left wondering whether aliens exist, Bennett has given those interested in UFOs an opportunity to discover ufology through the eyes of the man who started it all.
The work of Colin Bennett, including Flying Saucers over the White House, has received wide praise from various corners: “While Ruppelt and his world belong to the past, the demons of Bennett’s [Flying Saucers Over the White House] are still with us—as you are about to discover.” —from the Introduction, by Nick Pope, UFO Desk Office, UK Ministry of Defence, 1991–1994
“Colin Bennett's purpose in writing the book is to present Edward Ruppelt's information to a newer, more open generation--to let it decide what it wants to believe. ……… This is a must read for anyone interested in the origins of UFOs, or in the reaction of the government toward what has become a respectable area of study.” —Todd Rutherford, “Publishing Guru,” 2011
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
COLIN BENNETT has written several books, including The Entertainment Bomb, Looking for Orthon, and Politics of the Imagination, which won the Anomalist Award for Best Biography in 2002. Bennett also wrote an introduction to Ruppelt’s book The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects (reissued 2011 from Cosimo Classics). After leaving school to become a professional musician, Bennett returned to college to study English at University of Oxford, Balliol College. He wrote several plays that were performed in London before reinventing himself as an electronics engineer
and founding a consulting agency. Bennett currently resides in London where he continues to write and discover new interests.
FLYING SAUCERS OVER THE WHITE HOUSE:
The Inside Story of Captain Edward J. Ruppelt and his Official
U.S. Airforce Investigation
with Introduction by Nick Pope
Cosimo Books, December 2010
Paperback, 172 pages, $16.95 / £12.99
Always available at online bookstores. Visit www.cosimobooks.com
Ph: (212) 989-3616 Fax: (212) 989-3662
Flying Saucers US: http://www.amazon.com/Flying-Saucers-over-White-House/dp/161640454X/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1304344187&sr=1-2
Flying Saucers UK: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Flying-Saucers-Over-White-House/dp/161640454X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1304344221&sr=8-1
Ruppelt Book: http://www.amazon.com/Report-Unidentified-Flying-Objects-Original/dp/1616404949/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1304344077&sr=8-4