Pin It

UFOs, flyby anomaly, wormhole near Earth?

Like ·  · 
  • Jack Sarfatti On Dec 28, 2014, at 1:13 PM, Robert Addinall wrote:

    "My current guess is the same as that of the 50s AF generals; probably a small percentage of reports are caused by interstellar vessels." 

    I replied: They would have to come through a wormhole, perhaps the one that may be causing the flyby gravity anomaly in vicinity of Earth's orbit, but not any other planet as far as we know.  My own high strangeness 1952 contact claimed to be a conscious AI on a spacecraft from the future - hence my physics in

    How the Hippies Saved Physics by David Kaiser
    “How the Hippies Saved Physics gives us an unconventional view of some unconventional people engaged early in the fundamentals of quantum theory.

    "The rest would have mundane explanations and I'm also willing to entertain other explanations; perhaps a handful are some sort of "interdimensional" clouds of energy/organisms that occasionally show up. Some reports seem to indicate rather odd, amorphous shapes and lights, but others, such as those cited in the RAND report, do seem to clearly indicate mechanical craft.

    I would consider "killer" proof to be recovery and verification of a physical artifact in the public domain:

    1. A spacecraft or substantial component of a spacecraft (ie. large piece of wreckage with enough intact components and structure to indicate that it could not have come from any other type of aircraft).

    2. An EBE (extraterrestrial biological entity). At least a more or less complete body that could not be mistaken for anything else. Preferably a living being who can talk to reporters, academics, government officials etc on camera.

    3. Keep in mind the possibility that a mechanical artifact might also be a self aware AI that could talk to us. So, #3 is a combination of #1 and #2.

    Now if we prove that we can generate and contain negative mass or negative energy density and go ahead to build a working warp drive or wormhole generator, such a human made artifact would be highly suggestive - you would probably be justified in making the leap of saying that UFOs are mechanical craft driven by this type of technology and so the AFC explanation is correct. However, in the absence of a physical artifact or being, either mechanical or biological, I feel that we must simply treat the AFC explanation for the small percentage of reports unexplainable by mundane reasons as a good one, but we can't be certain.

    Given that FTL travel also necessarily implies possible time travel, some of the craft may be ours from our future light cone, or from civilizations that have become connected with us in some way in our future light cone. I treat this as a subset of the AFC hypothesis. Aliens need not be totally alien. How such back from the future interactions might play out we do not yet know - whether there is some chronological protection mechanism law of physics that makes consistent closed timelike curves (CTCs) or whether they are actually changing their past/our present."