Tell Nick Pope to stop repeating himself with a confused bemused startled look on his face with Tucker Carlson and give my explanations some play in the media.
We have explained the phenomenon.
Why does he continue to keep the public in the dark?
It’s elementary physics.
Now it’s a matter of engineering the meta-materials with the desired electromagnetic susceptibility resonant response functions S(x) to external electromagnetic source tensors WEAK Tuv(x) that induce the desired Guv(x) output warp fields.
This is really simple stuff that even dummies like you should be able to understand.
It’s no more complicated than Ohm’s law
I = V/R
I = Output current
V = Input voltage
R = electric resistance (dissipative Joule heating)
Einstein’s 1916 gravity field eq modified in 2020 by me and Keith Wanser
Guv(x) warp field output analog to output current I
8piG/c^4 analog to 1/R
R analog to SPACE-TIME STIFFNESS = STRING TENSION FOR VACUUM VIRTUAL ELECTRON-POSITRON PAIRS DIRAC SEA
S(x)Tuv(x) source analog to input voltage V
Tuv(x) = EM input pump field in vacuum
S(x)Tuv(x) = RENORMALIZED PUMP-PHOTON/METAMATERIAL QUASI-PARTICLE/COLLECTIVE MODE STRESS-ENERGY TENSOR
S(x) and Tuv(x) both have dissipative inelastic scattering IMAGINARY PARTS/
THEREFORE, FOLLOWING RICHARD FEYNMAN’S CH 23, VOL 1 LECTURES IN PHYSICS
Guv(x) = 8pi(G/c^4)|S(x)||Tuv(x)|cos(s(x) + tuv(x))
tans(x) = Ims(x)/Res(x)
Switching sign of the cosine switches between attractive gravity red shift and repulsive gravity blue shift
LOW ENERGY OPERATION OF WARP DRIVE IS FOR METAMATERIAL RESONANCE |S(x)| >> 1.
Now anyone who cannot follow this math, is not competent at all to comment on UFOs, Tic Tacs et-al.
On Jan 16, 2021, at 11:58 AM, Tim Ventura wrote:
That's why I suggested the beer...
Same old same old lame stream rehashing by dimwits.
APEC Conference today - starting in 10 minutes.Ron Evans should be speaking on Greenglow, and Nick Pope on UAP's at 2pmHere's the Zoom conference link: https://zoom.us/j/6754514424Join, be mellow, bring your own beer.