On Feb 29, 2012, at 11:17 AM, art wagner wrote:

"(in certain models) it is transparent that the origin of the gravitational coupling constants has nothing to do with ideas like 'vacuum energy' or statements like 'energy gravitates', because energy itself is an emergent concept."  
http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1103.4841

Art please understand I have the only viable solution of this problem.
It needs retrocausality.
Seth Lloyd said on 2-27-12 he knew my result was mathematically sound.
I mean the de Sitter redshift of hc/Lp^4 ---> hc/Lp^2A
however Seth could not believe it was the future horizon, he thinks, like they all do that it's the past particle horizon.
That won't work. Our past horizon is not de Sitter.
One must stitch the past and future solutions together.
This is discussed in Tamara Davis's thesis.

Yes, emergence of the metric from the condensate I obviously agree with and have given a model for that. I need eight Goldstone phases in the post-inflation vacuum to get Einstein's GR field equations emergent in the Cartan form tetrad-spin connection formalism of Rovelli's Ch 2 of "Quantum Gravity."

Indeed, the entire classical world is emergent from different kinds of ground state condensates. That's P.W. Anderson's "More is different."