On Sep 23, 2016, at 11:23 AM, Brian Josephson <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. > wrote: "A question has been raised in this discussion as to whether the approach I am advocating ('The Revolution') makes predictions that are different from QM. The answer was given back in 1988 in a paper by Dipankar Home, Michael Conrad and myself, at http://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~bdj10/papers/urbino.html
I have no objection to the view in this paper only that it is qualitative and does not go far enough. Stapp and others have proposed that reality involves a fundamental life process, or creative process. Yes, and that fundamental creative process is the post-quantum "two-way' (Bohm and Hiley) "action-reaction" (Rod Sutherland) "adaptive feed-back-control loop" (Sarfatti) between mental Bohm quantum bit advanced destiny and retarded history pilot waves on the one hand, and their shared classical material beables on the other hand. The classical material beables previously mis-named "hidden variables" are completely missing in the conventional quantum theory including its extension to relativity. For example, in Sutherland's post-quantum relativistic Dirac theory, the post-quantum Dirac equation with the be able source is equation (1.4). Conventional relativistic Dirac theory has the RHS equal to zero corresponding to the de Broglie guidance constraint and the preservation of the Born probability rule in the linear unitary time evolution. The beables are hidden in this limit only because of the de Broglie guidance condition. In contrast, in the post-quantum regime, the time evolution is non-linear and non-unitary with violation or "bias" (Stapp) of the Born probability rule, and, therefore, locally real retrocausal "zig-zag" (O. Costa de Beauregard) entanglement messaging between Alice and Bob (no matter what their space-time separation) or even between Alice herself between two difference events on her timeline (i.e. temporal auto-entanglement messaging).