Begin forwarded message:
Subject: Re: Boyd BushmanFrom: JACK SARFATTI <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. >Date: October 27, 2014 at 8:07:57 PM PDT
It's the "core story" again. It won't go away.
On Oct 27, 2014, at 6:43 PM,This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. n wrote:
Paul,I believe that for a time Boyd Bushman was also a member of this e-mail list, though he might never have submitted any comments to it.Of course, many contributors have more than a hunch that space drives without mass expulsion are possible because we suspect that they show up in our skies.Exactly my point at NASA-DARPA 100 YSS which met with shuddering from Marc Millis and Eric Davis and a few others (Olum and Cramer?). Only Doug Trumbull has the cajones to back me up on this even though Davis is a well-known UFO investigator from Robert Bigelow’s Skinwalker Ranch NIDS days.Rogue physicist Dr. Jack Sarfatti crashes the UFO topic into DARPA’s 100 Year Starship Symposium. Are there any clues left smoldering in the debris field?
Nonetheless, it is disturbing to hear a specific account of how they might be operated, by whom or where they might come from.Bushman admits he is not a theorist which accounts for some of the seemingly wrong language he used about the physics. However, he obviously believes what he is saying. What interested me most was his saying that 19 military were lost in one battle with a saucer. Also the photos of the aliens - of course these days all of that can be easily fabricated. So, to be Devil’s Advocate some one in the IC went to a lot of trouble to fool Bushman if what he believes has no truth. This has happened before.
These stories continue to drip out of centers such as Area 51, but it is very difficult to verify these stories based on the very nature of these institutions. I do note that about 15 or 20 years ago, one of the staff in President Eisenhower's security council ( Phillip Corso) published a book late in life making similar claims. And subsequently it was suggested that the reason Colonel Corso wrote the sensational book was to allay his or family medical expenses.So what would have motivated someone in Bushman's position?And of a more sundry nature:Why would aliens call their home world Quintonia?Was it supposed to be 68 light years away or 68,000?Can you imagine lending an alien a camera to take pictures of a flight back?What did the surface of the world look like?Does this change anyone's plans for the week?In a message dated 10/27/2014 1:44:56 P.M. Central Daylight Time,This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. writes:Duncan:
“Or for that matter of a permanent magnet that "emits pulses"?”
Please note the below Bushman patent FIG-3 and the associated patent text that goes with it as appended below it for it has at least a partial answer to your magnetic pulse question.
As to whether Boyd was an LM Senior Scientist, I can vouch for him on that topic for I met Bushman at LM/Fort Worth at their Light-Speed facility in 2000 and I think 2001 and he was given that title at his introductions by his LM boss, Jim Peoples. And yes, that is the same Jim R. Peoples who is currently on Woodward’s MET e-mail distribution. Woodward can also vouch for Boyd’s employer for Jim W. was also at the same LM/Fort Worth set of meetings.
“Referring now to FIG. 3, a coil 80 comprised of a conducting material, such as copper, is depicted disposed around single unopposed magnet 10. An electric power source, such as an AC generator 85 supplies an alternating current to coil 80 at a variety of frequencies. The strength of the magnetic beam 5 varies according to the frequency of the alternating current through coil 80 due to the magnetic field created by coil 80. Thus, a magnetic pulse beam is generated according to the frequency of the current passing through coil 80. When the frequency of the AC current is high, such as ten to the fifteenth power hertz, the magnetic pulse emitted simulates the effect of a destructive electromagnetic pulse. In alternative embodiments, coils can be disposed around each magnet or around the magnet assembly as a whole to create a magnetic field and pulse according to the frequency of a current applied to the coil.”
BTW, Boyd had his own pet theory of everything (ToE) that postulated there were 8 fundamental forces not just 4 with magnetism being one of the eight…Clearly Boyd did not understand theoretical physics well. However, neither did Edison and Tesla. Because his theories are crackpot not even wrong no doubt, we cannot because of that dismiss his “data” claims based on our superior knowledge of theory. I suspect that Boyd was a puppet on someone’s string.
Best,
Paul March
Principal Engineer
NASA/JSC/Eagleworks Lab
Houston, TX 77058
Ph: 281-483-
“ Basic research is what I'm doing when I don't know what I'm doing. ”
-- Wernher von Braun
From: Duncan Cumming [This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. ]
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 12:18 PM
To: j
Subject: Boyd Bushman
So, Jack, given your physics background, what do you think of a "beam of magnetic field", or of such a beam constituting a "magnetic monopole”?I looked at one of Boyd's patents, US5,929,372. It describes a simple arrangement of four permanent magnets, and he saysIt also says that the assignee of the patent is Lockheed Martin, but I cant find any evidence that he actually worked for Lockheed Martin. When one files a patent, one can, of course, nominate any assignee that one wishes.
"This beam is a magnetic monopole which emits pulses, levitates, degausses, stops electronics and separates materials."nonsense of course
Or for that matter of a permanent magnet that "emits pulses”?seems silly - I have not actually read anything he has written.
Duncan
The Boyd Bushman Area 51 Mystery
- Details
- Category: Weird Desk Archive (2014)
©
2024 - 2020
Internet Science Education Project