re: 
http://www.specialoperationsmanual.com

 
On Jan 4, 2015, at 3:27 PM, Larry Lemke NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration wrote:
 
"For what it’s worth:
 
One of the criticisms of the SOM1-01 document is a purported anachronism namely, the mention on page 8 of the possible use of “downed satellites” as a deceptive cover explanation for preserving the security of a UFO recovery site.  The purported anachronism arises from the fact that on the date of original publication—April, 1954--there were no artificial satellites, downed or otherwise.  I remember noting this anachronism myself when I first saw a copy of the SOM1-01 document mailed to me by Hal Puthoff (in 1994 or 1995, as I recall).  
 
It wasn’t until a couple of days ago after visiting Ryan's website that I realized that the back side of the cover page of the document is actually a record of authorized modifications to the document.  That particular record is very blurry and difficult to read, but the Woods have produced a legible replica which shows that page 8 of the document was actually replaced on May 31, 1955.  In other words, the reference to “downed satellites” dates to May 31, 1955, NOT April, 1954.  
 
Is that important?  Maybe.  If you read back over the history of artificial satellites and how they played into the space race between the US and the USSR, the timeline is that by the fall of 1954 the US contingent of scientists attached to the organizing committee of the International Geophysical Year (IGY) had successfully lobbied the organizing committee to include words in the IGY planning documents approving of the use of “small satellite vehicles” for scientific investigation during the IGY.  This provided top cover for the scientists who wanted to use spacecraft for scientific exploration and those in the military-industrial complex who wanted to develop satellites for other purposes, and prompted high level considerations within the US national security apparatus about how the US should respond.  
 
In late 1954 through the spring of 1955 there was a flurry of activity behind the scenes in the US with committees trying to figure out if we could put a satellite in orbit by 1957, which organization should lead it, how much it would cost, etc., etc.   The Soviets were making non-specific press releases indicating that that they were clearly going through a similar process.   During the period 1954-1955 (from Wikipedia) “Nelson Rockefeller was appointed Special Assistant to the President for Foreign Affairs (sometimes referred to as Special Assistant to the President for Psychological Warfare). He was tasked with providing the President with advice and assistance in developing programs by which the various departments of the government could counter Soviet foreign policy challenges. As part of this responsibility he was named as the President's representative on the Operations Coordinating Board, a committee of the National Security Council… The OCB's purpose was to oversee coordinated execution of security policy and plans, including clandestine operations.”  In May of 1955, Rockefeller wrote:  “I am impressed..by the costly consequences of allowing the Russian initiative to outrun ours through an achievement that will symbolize scientific and technological advancement to people everywhere. The stake of prestige that is involved makes this a race that we cannot afford to lose."  
 
Although the first satellite would not be put into orbit until 1957, the decision to race the Soviet Union for the privilege of doing so was made in the US in late spring, 1955. On July 29, the White House announced that the US would launch one or more artificial satellites as its contribution to the International Geophysical Year.  The USSR followed with a similar announcement of its own six days later, and the race, as they say, was on.
 
However, according to [http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/SP-4202/chapter2.html] the decision to proceed with a satellite plan was made on May 26, 1955, by the National Security Council.  So when page 8 of the SOM1-01 was replaced on May 31, 1955, the US was already formally in the satellite business even though it would not be announced publicly for another couple of months."
 
On Jan 4, 2015, at 6:28 AM, Paul Murad <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.> wrote:
 
Ryan:
 
There are two problems here. They are that either the document is fake or the document has any disinformation.
 
ok
 
If disinformation is to be successful, it has to have some level of truth or honest information. 
 
ok
 
This is a necessity for establishing credibility for the entire document. Whenever we got any Soviet disinformation, the problem was to find those pieces that had legitimate information for credibility.  The same is to be true if this is real in this document. Regardless, some real information needs to be established.
 
Personally I feel the document is a fake because there is no clear identification of a government organization. Government types like to make sure people know about where things are going or from where. That involves highly classified documents so you can refer back any questions or what points may cause problems.  I might have missed this but with a quick scan, I did not see such information...
 
I read the Einstein/Oppenheim meeting and are you implying it was a fake?  If you look at it, this looks like a precursor for what this country has performed with respect to treating UFOs and so on.  Einstein carries significant weight. If it is a fake, then it was well done! This information is similar to what Col. Corso said regarding early UFO activities so there is some correlations. The question is to find out the truth from the lies.
 
It would be interesting if there was any mention of UFOs in the Einstein papers. I doubt it. Same for John Archibald Wheeler’s papers because he switched to gravity research around 1952 at the peak of the flying saucer craze and he had top security clearance.
 
Regarding typographic comments, this does not fly for several reasons. Secretaries may have had errors in documents or if critical, the author could have made mistakes.  Remember we did not have WORD or files of documents to the point that people published whatever they could get out of the typewriter.
 
Finally, the issue about alien communications.  Appearently SETI does not work because aliens may not use electromagnetic communications moving at the speed of light.  If they go supposedly faster than the speed of light, the messages would be months or years after the events. The only possibilities is a torsion field as predicted by the Russians or gravity waves considering recent findings from Podkletnov... Oh, I forgot, it was all disinformation.  So is the Kosyrev star experiment or that jets leave a black hole where this is not particles from an accretion disk but from the black hole itself because of evaporation…
 
Gravity waves also move at c.
 
Now to go back to other more meaningful activities...
 
Paul Murad
Morningstar Applied Physics, LLC
www.morningstarap.com
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
 
 
 
From: Ryan Wood <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
To: 'Robert Addinall' <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>; 'JACK SARFATTI' <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>; 'IFPA GROUP-EUROPE' <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
 
Sent: Saturday, January 3, 2015 9:45 PM
Subject: RE: Majestic-12 Group Special Operations Manual -- REAL
 
If you think it might be disinformation of some sort, see my 10 page paper on this entire issue on majesticdocuments.com http://www.majesticdocuments.com/pdf/psywar.pdf
 
Or excerpted under authentication at www.specialoperationsmanual.com
 
WHY disinformation? Who are we trying to deceive? For what purpose? Scare the Russians in ’54?   If it were disinformation it is so good that the KGB would have decided to assign more assets to penetrate, Wright Patt, Area-51, Kirtland AFB, those people etc.  
 
After all the KGB ripped off the bomb secrets with ease.  Any logical military / political decision team would AVOID attracting attention to this matter.  So the notion of disinformation utterly FAILS.
 
We know SOM1-01 was printed with a hot lead printing press of the era according to author of the 1958 US Government Printing Office Style Manual. My father (Dr. Bob Wood) and I interviewed him in his home in Virginia, more than a decade ago. His read was that SOM1-01 is authentic because of the raised Z in the typography. The use of “screw driver” as two words and the capitalization of “First Aid” which is now first aid. Even the arrogance of the phrase “Central Intelligence” rather than Central Intelligence Agency suggested to him that the CIA involved. 
 
I can go on, but that’s not the point. Disinformation is not at all probable. Far more likely that it’s all real.  
 
Cheers Ryan
 
Ryan S. Wood
Author
Majic Eyes Only – Earth’s Encounters With Extraterrestrial Technology
www.majiceyesonly.com 
14004 Quail Ridge Drive
Broomfield, CO 80020
720-887-8171 (ph)
 
 
 
 
 
From: Robert Addinall [mailto:This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2015 8:33 PM
To: Ryan Wood; 'JACK SARFATTI'; 'IFPA GROUP-EUROPE'
 
Subject: Re: Majestic-12 Group Special Operations Manual - Website - BOGUS
 
I gave a couple of specific reactions, but as I said none of them positively confirm or deny on their own. Sometimes a manual will use superlatives repeatedly or spend a lot of time on vague generalities about the purpose of an organization which the people reading it should already know (for example, "very highest security" will not often appear since "highest security" already imparts the gravity of the situation in the context). Overall, Col. Alexander and others of us have a fair bit of experience with NATO nation military documents, so you get a sense of whether something smells off or not. Any determined disinformation attempt would do a decent job of forging a control page and initials/signatures of people who should have been there at the time, so again it's very difficult ‎to confirm or reject based on that.
 
I actually just finished writing another message about why I suspect that a lot of disinformation is out there about UFOs and will send it momentarily.
 
Incidentally I don't have any problem with you selling reproductions of MJ 12 documents; there is a market for it, and it's also valuable to see what disinformation is out there and to see if there are common threads or bits of good info that can be teased out.
 
 
 
From: Ryan Wood
Sent: Friday, January 2, 2015 9:47 PM
To: 'JACK SARFATTI'; 'IFPA GROUP-EUROPE'
 
Subject: RE: Majestic-12 Group Special Operations Manual - Website - BOGUS?
 
If you think it’s a “fabrication and doesn’t ring true” then those comments are useless, it’s just speculation on your part.  
 
This is 1954 Top secret stuff…Why do even think you have a perspective on what would be true or not.
 
So now, I’ll give you some investigated facts. 
 
So the change control page has initials of JRT and EWL in it where those document control / MJ-12 control officers changed pages from ‘54 to ‘57. 
 
We know the manual came from Kirtland AFB UNIT KB-88, so I checked the phone book exhaustively for the JRT’s and EWL’s in 1955 and sure enough lt. JR Totten (JRT) and Col Edward Levine (EWL) both lived on base on Perimeter road.  Furthermore, our private detectives interviewed EWL’s family and they confirmed his “special” military service.
 
I could go on, but I think it’s just a waste of time.  Please give me specific reasons why you think it’s a fake.
 
Cheers Ryan
 
Ryan S. Wood
Author
Majic Eyes Only – Earth’s Encounters With Extraterrestrial Technology
www.majiceyesonly.com 
14004 Quail Ridge Drive
Broomfield, CO 80020
720-887-8171 (ph)
 
 
From: JACK SARFATTI [mailto:This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2015 3:41 PM
To: IFPA GROUP-EUROPE; This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
 
Subject: Re: Majestic-12 Group Special Operations Manual - Website - BOGUS?
 
Right, but why is Ryan pushing this? Who really wrote it?
 
 
On Jan 2, 2015, at 1:30 PM, Robert Addinall wrote:
 
Yes it just doesn't ring true.
 
Of course it depends on the writers and editors, but military manuals from NATO countries usually avoid use of superlatives like "very." The writing doesn't ring true.
 
Also, a lot of the content is actually somewhat vague, dressed up a bit to appear specific. Again, this can be a problem with real manuals, but it's a warning sign.
 
We also know, generally, that the MJ-12 conspiracy stuff is smack in the middle ‎of all the disinformation that floats around on this topic.
 
Taking all the clues together it just smells like a fabrication.
 
Certain accurate details may have been inserted in it, which is common with disinformation, but overall it's still misdirection.
 
On Jan 2, 2015, at 1:12 PM, IFPA GROUP-EUROPE <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.> wrote:
 
Yes Jack, I concur ......
Pure disinformation... 
This is BS for mass UFO distraction from the real things.
T
 
 
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 9:44 PM, JACK SARFATTI <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.> wrote:
Colonel John Alexander thinks the manual is bogus.
 
On Jan 2, 2015, at 10:08 AM, IFPA GROUP-EUROPE <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.> wrote:
 
Jack et al ..
Here are links to PDF of the "Manual"
PART 1
 
https://thetruthbehindthescenes.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/5014360-som101-extraterrestrial-entities-and-technology-recovery-and-disposal-april-1954-part-1.pdf
PART 2
 
https://thetruthbehindthescenes.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/5014354-som101-extraterrestrial-entities-and-technology-recovery-and-disposal-april-1954-part-2.pdf
 
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 6:59 PM, JACK SARFATTI <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.> wrote:
comments on this?