Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
Our government is spending many millions of dollars investigating UFOs (or UAPs). There are certain paradoxes concerning these phenomena, and it seems that there are more inconsistencies all the time. This is leading to chaos, confusion, and further distrust of institutions. The government, to paraphrase President Reagan, is not the solution. It seems to be the problem.
The most noticeable paradox is that UFOs, with their supposed advanced technology, should have better stealth than do our supposedly, relatively primitive aircraft, such as the B-2 bomber — but they don’t. UFOs, if they wish not to be seen, should never be detected at all — or, if they do not care whether they are seen, should be observed very frequently, and under conditions conducive to accurate, detailed photography. Either one or the other of these should be likely, but neither is the case.
What is least likely is the halfway measure — that is, they only sometimes get seen, but never under conditions that would provide convincing proof of their existence, such as for example as we have with photographs of eagles or hummingbirds. Instead, all we get are fuzzy, grainy pictures that never persuade reasonable skeptics.
It has long been stated by such skeptics that they would be persuaded of the existence of nonhuman advanced technology if they could see it firsthand, and analyze it, to show that it could not have been created with our present abilities. Proof would consist of actual specimens of such technology or actual specimens of alien creatures themselves, with demonstrably different biology than anything that could have evolved on Earth.
To date, nothing of the sort has been presented for public examination.
To read more, click here